The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 195 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines when it comes to ease of use and guest experience — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Tapendium shines in ease of use and customer support .
Side-by-side ratings based on 195 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 1 |
After analyzing 195 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Tapendium users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | #12 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | #7 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | #9 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | #7 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and Tapendium for your in-room hotel tablets hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, budget, and operational goals. Crave offers a highly customizable, feature-rich platform with extensive integrations and a broad global presence, making it suitable for hotels aiming to elevate guest engagement and operational efficiency. Tapendium, in contrast, provides a straightforward, low-cost digital compendium with basic features, ideal for hotels seeking affordable guest information and upsell capabilities. Which solution aligns better with your priorities?
Both products aim to enhance the guest experience through digital in-room solutions, but Crave’s offerings are more comprehensive. Crave is built for hotels that want to provide a polished, interactive, and customizable guest interface, with robust features like room service, local recommendations, and multi-language support, all backed by a high rating of 4.6/5 from 147 reviews. Tapendium, with a 4/5 rating from a single review, focuses on delivering essential hotel info and upselling without extensive customization or integrations.
Crave’s platform is designed to streamline operations and offer multiple monetization avenues, making it more suitable for larger or luxury hotels seeking to differentiate themselves. Tapendium excels as a cost-effective, simple-to-manage solution, especially for properties that prioritize basic information sharing and incremental revenue through upsell features. Do you need a fully customizable experience, or can your hotel operate effectively with a straightforward digital compendium?
If your hotel needs a feature-rich, highly customizable platform with extensive integration options, go with Crave. Its suite of 28 shared features plus 27 unique to Crave enables tailored guest interactions, digital payments, and operational tools like request management and contactless ordering. Crave’s platform is well-suited for hotels that want to elevate guest engagement, improve upselling, and streamline operations, especially given its strong market presence (22 countries) and high review scores.
If your hotel requires a simple, low-cost solution focused on basic in-room info, guest services, and incremental revenue, Tapendium is the better choice. Its core features cover essential guest information, surveys, and upsell opportunities, with a straightforward management interface. Tapendium’s lower cost (with no clear pricing info but implied affordability) and ease of use make it ideal for smaller hotels or those new to digital amenities.
In summary, choose Crave if you need depth, customization, and extensive integrations; pick Tapendium if affordability and simplicity are your priorities.
Crave’s platform scores 4.5/5 for ease of use based on detailed reviews, with many users praising its intuitive interface and seamless guest navigation. However, some critique the backend content management for being somewhat cumbersome, especially when making quick updates, and note that the hardware design could improve in aspects like sleep mode. Its onboarding process is rated 4.37/5, with most users reporting a smooth initial setup.
Tapendium scores a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its straightforward management system and simple deployment. Its minimalistic approach reduces the learning curve for staff and simplifies content updates, making it especially appealing for properties with limited IT resources.
Edge: Tapendium.
Crave’s platform boasts 28 shared features plus 27 exclusive, including hotel directory, multi-lingual support, digital menus, in-venue ordering, contactless payments, Google Pay, and POS integration—covering a comprehensive range of guest services and operational tools. Its extensive feature set enables hotels to create a tailored, interactive experience that can support revenue growth through upselling and personalized marketing.
Tapendium offers a core set of features, primarily focusing on guest information, surveys, and upsell prompts. It’s streamlined with fewer functionalities, lacking the advanced integrations and customization options of Crave.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s support team receives high praise, with a 4.6/5 rating and reviews highlighting responsiveness and helpfulness during onboarding and ongoing operations. Numerous users mention their satisfaction with support, describing it as diligent and proactive, which is essential when managing complex integrations and customizations.
Tapendium also scores a perfect 5/5 for support, but with only one recent review, its support reputation is less established. Still, its small team makes personalized assistance likely, though detailed feedback from users is limited.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s platform integrates with 17 verified partners, including prominent systems like Oracle Hospitality, Infor, and Amadeus, providing extensive options for PMS, POS, and other operational tools. Its broad integration ecosystem enables hoteliers to unify guest services with their existing tech stack seamlessly.
Tapendium has 9 verified partners, including RMS, Mews, and Shiji Group, but offers fewer integration options overall. Its limited ecosystem suits properties with simpler needs or those already aligned with these systems.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s robust review score of 4.6/5 from 147 reviews—most recent in the past 6 months—reflects strong satisfaction across diverse hotel segments, especially luxury and resort properties. Hoteliers value its extensive feature set, support, and ability to elevate guest experience, making it highly recommended with a 90% likelihood to recommend.
Tapendium’s single review rates it at 4/5, with positive feedback about cost savings and ease of management. However, the limited review base and recency make Crave’s ratings more reliable and indicative of broader user satisfaction.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing starts at $1,200 for the base hardware, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs. Its pricing model suggests a one-time hardware purchase plus potential customizations, making costs predictable for larger deployments.
Tapendium does not disclose specific pricing but emphasizes affordability, implying a lower-cost solution. Its model likely involves a simple license or subscription fee, suitable for smaller hotels or those seeking minimal upfront investment.
Not ideal if you need a quick, low-cost solution without extensive integrations or customization.
Not ideal if your hotel requires advanced features, complex integrations, or a highly personalized guest interface.
Crave Interactive offers a full-featured, customizable platform with a strong global presence, excellent support, and extensive integrations, making it suitable for hotels that want a premium guest experience and operational tools. Its high review score and broad feature set justify its investment for mid-to-large properties focused on revenue and service quality.
Tapendium provides a straightforward, low-cost solution for hotels that need essential digital guest information and upselling capabilities without complexity. Its simple management system and positive user feedback make it a good fit for budget-conscious hotels, smaller properties, or those just starting their digital transformation journey.
If your hotel values depth, customization, and extensive integration, Crave is the clear choice. However, if simplicity and cost are your primary concerns, Tapendium may meet your needs effectively.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Tapendium share 28 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 15 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Tapendium share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Tapendium offers 9. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Tapendium leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Tapendium: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Tapendium has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor