The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 194 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
Xotelier (Tablets) shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 194 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 0 |
After analyzing 194 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while Xotelier (Tablets) users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Xotelier (Tablets)
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Xotelier (Tablets)
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Xotelier (Tablets)
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Xotelier (Tablets)
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and Xotelier for your hotel’s in-room tablet solution hinges on your priorities around features, support, and proven success. Crave’s platform is well-established, boasting a high rating based on hundreds of recent reviews, whereas Xotelier’s offering appears limited in market presence and lacks review data. Both aim to elevate guest experience, but their capabilities and track records vary significantly.
Crave’s extensive features, user satisfaction, and regional reach make it the more reliable choice for hotels seeking comprehensive guest engagement tools. Xotelier’s narrower scope and absence of recent feedback suggest it’s less suited for hotels prioritizing proven, modern solutions.
Crave Interactive is designed to serve hotels that want a feature-rich, customizable guest engagement platform with proven support and extensive integrations — ideal for mid-range to luxury properties. Its robust feature set, including digital directories, multi-lingual support, in-room control, and upselling tools, addresses a wide range of guest needs, making it suitable for hotels aiming to enhance operational efficiency and guest satisfaction simultaneously.
Xotelier, on the other hand, appears targeted at smaller or budget-conscious establishments, or those seeking a simpler, more basic solution. The lack of available reviews and features limits confidence in its ability to support complex hotel operations or deliver advanced guest services. If your hotel needs a tested, highly-rated solution with proven results, Crave clearly leads; if minimal features suffice, Xotelier might be considered, but with caution.
Crave’s platform scores a 4.5 out of 5 for ease of use, backed by a 4.37/5 onboarding rating and positive guest feedback about navigation and functionality. Reviewers highlight its intuitive interface and straightforward content management, making staff adoption relatively smooth, though some mention content updates can be slow.
Xotelier’s usability is unverified due to a lack of reviews and user feedback, making it difficult to assess its learning curve or staff adoption experience. Its minimal presence and absence of recent reviews suggest it may not have the same user-centric focus as Crave.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave Interactive offers a comprehensive suite of 55 features, including digital menus, in-room controls, request management, multi-lingual support, contactless ordering, payment integrations, and guest messaging. These features cover the full spectrum of guest engagement, operational automation, and revenue opportunities.
Xotelier, by comparison, does not publicly list any specific features, and no unique functionalities are documented. Its limited feature set, combined with zero verified integrations or advanced tools, makes Crave the clear leader.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s support team receives a 4.6/5 rating from users, with reviews praising their responsiveness and support efficiency. Guests and staff alike find Crave’s onboarding process smooth, and ongoing support attentive, which is crucial for maintaining complex systems.
Xotelier offers no available reviews or support ratings, leaving its support quality uncertain. The absence of recent customer feedback strongly favors Crave for hotel operators who prioritize reliable support.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including Oracle Hospitality, Amadeus, Google Pay, and POS systems, enabling a connected guest experience and operational automation. These integrations facilitate smoother workflows and richer guest interactions.
Xotelier lists no verified integrations, limiting its ability to work with existing hotel systems or expand functionalities. For hotels seeking a platform that can connect with their current tech stack, Crave offers a distinct advantage.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
With 147 reviews and recent feedback, Crave maintains an overall rating of 4.6/5 and a 92.76/100 on the HTScore, with a 90% likelihood of recommendation. Hotels across segments, especially independent and luxury properties, praise its functionality, support, and impact on guest satisfaction.
Xotelier has no reviews or ratings available, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or compare hotel segment preferences. The data indicates Crave’s platform is the more trusted choice among hoteliers.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing starts at $1,200, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs. This straightforward fee covers the software license, with no free trial offered.
Xotelier’s pricing details are unavailable, which complicates a direct comparison. Many hotels prefer transparent pricing to evaluate ROI clearly, and Crave’s known fee structure offers that clarity.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Crave Interactive is a well-established, feature-rich platform with a proven track record reflected in over 147 recent reviews and high ratings. Its extensive integrations, regional presence, and strong support make it suitable for mid-size to luxury hotels that want to enhance guest experience and operational efficiency.
Xotelier’s limited information, lack of reviews, and absence of documented features suggest it’s less suited for hotels that depend on reliability, advanced features, and proven support. It may appeal to very small establishments or those experimenting with basic solutions, but its long-term viability remains uncertain.
Choose Crave if you value a trusted, comprehensive platform with a demonstrable positive impact. Opt for Xotelier only if your needs are minimal, and you’re prepared to accept limited support and features.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Xotelier (Tablets)
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Xotelier (Tablets) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Xotelier (Tablets)
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Digital directory | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 43 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
Xotelier (Tablets)
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and Xotelier (Tablets) share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while Xotelier (Tablets) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. Xotelier (Tablets): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and Xotelier (Tablets) has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor