The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Criton stands out with exclusive features like Local Recommendations.
LIKE MAGIC shines in Ease of Use and Value for Money — especially for extended-stay properties (5.0/5), with exclusive features like Web-app.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 21 | 26 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Criton users most value its , while LIKE MAGIC users highlight operational efficiency and time savings, booking engine performance and usability, corporate/b2b feature gaps. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational efficiency and time savings
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking engine performance and usability
▾
|
|
|
+
Corporate/B2B feature gaps
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one guest journey platform
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization and branding limitations
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Guest Apps vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 14 reviews | #10 10 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #18 4 reviews | #14 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #18 2 reviews | #17 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #27 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #15 7 reviews | #18 8 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #13 10 reviews | #33 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #16 3 reviews | #19 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #9 4 reviews | #4 13 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #10 2 reviews | #30 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #12 18 reviews | #10 24 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #19 0 reviews | — |
Criton and LIKE MAGIC both address digital guest engagement but diverge sharply in focus and operational impact. Criton centers on flexible branded mobile apps that digitize guest information and support contactless services, fitting properties prioritizing brand control and guest content customization. LIKE MAGIC emphasizes automating the entire guest journey through a lightweight web-app with seamless integrations, excelling in operational efficiency at small to medium hotels.
Both platforms replace printed materials and manual guest communication, reducing front desk workload and enhancing upsell opportunities. Criton’s strength lies in content management and guest information delivery, while LIKE MAGIC drives revenue and staff productivity by automating check-in, messaging, and booking processes at scale.
If your hotel is an independent boutique or luxury property seeking a fully branded guest app with comprehensive content control, Criton’s 21 reviews averaging 4.6/5 overall, with high ratings especially from boutique hotels (4.9/5 across seven reviews), recommend it. Criton’s local recommendations feature supports guest engagement with curated experiences, though its slower integration rollout may affect properties needing rapid deployment.
If you operate an extended stay, serviced apartment, or city center hotel in Europe focused on automating guest workflows and reducing staff training time, LIKE MAGIC’s higher overall rating of 5/5 across 26 reviews and dominant presence in extended stay segments (33% user base, 5/5 rating from 13 reviews) make it the stronger choice. LIKE MAGIC’s web-app eliminates app installs, streamlining guest access, and its case studies demonstrate operational cost cuts, including an 80% staffing reduction at a 168-room property.
For limited service or budget hotels, LIKE MAGIC holds a slight edge with 4.9/5 from 4 reviews versus Criton’s 4.6/5 from 5. Data for vacation rentals and hostels is minimal, so decisions there are less supported.
LIKE MAGIC leads ease of use with a perfect 5/5 rating in both ease of use and onboarding, compared to Criton’s 4.5/5 and 4.4/5 respectively, based on 10+ reviews for both. Reviewers praise LIKE MAGIC’s intuitive interface and rapid staff training, with one noting staff onboarding takes just 1.5 days. The web-app format avoids app store hassles, reducing guest friction.
Criton users find the app user-friendly but note a need for more template options and greater interface customization to better reflect brand identity. While the content management system allows easy updates, some reviewers cite delays in feature rollouts and teething issues during implementation.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Criton and LIKE MAGIC each have one unique feature not available in the other. Criton offers local recommendations integrated within the app, enabling hotels to provide curated experiences that enhance guest engagement and potential upsell revenue. This feature is valuable for hotels focusing on personalized guest journeys.
LIKE MAGIC includes a web-app feature that eliminates the need for guests to download a native app, simplifying access and increasing adoption rates. This also reduces barriers for guests less comfortable with downloading apps, boosting engagement and enabling seamless updates without app store approvals.
Both products share nine core features including mobile check-in, messaging, upsell options, and analytics. The lack of mobile check-in and digital key integrations in Criton reviews suggests slower rollout compared to LIKE MAGIC’s automated check-in workflow praised by users.
Edge: Even.
LIKE MAGIC holds a slight advantage in customer support ratings (4.8/5 onboarding and 4.8/5 support) compared to Criton’s combined 4.4-4.6/5 scores. LIKE MAGIC reviewers highlight responsive, solution-oriented teams and availability during urgent cases, though some request phone support for emergencies.
Criton receives consistent praise for quick issue resolution and a friendly support team. Several reviewers emphasize the vendor’s commitment to innovation and helpfulness, but some note longer wait times for integration of desired features, indicating a slower development cadence.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
Criton offers 15 verified integrations, exceeding LIKE MAGIC’s 11 by roughly 36%, including key PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, Maestro PMS, and access control systems like Vingcard. Unique Criton integrations with Benbria and SHR Group enhance guest messaging and booking capabilities for properties with existing vendor ecosystems.
LIKE MAGIC integrates with several modern platforms like apaleo, SALTO Systems, Adyen, Triptease, and TrustYou, focusing on streamlined payment, access, and reputation management for European properties.
Both share Oracle Hospitality and Mews. Hotels requiring deep PMS and key system integration, especially in multi-vendor environments, benefit from Criton’s broader integration network. Properties prioritizing streamlined end-to-end digital workflows with newer tech stacks may find LIKE MAGIC’s integrations sufficient.
Edge: Criton.
LIKE MAGIC leads with a 5/5 overall rating from 26 reviews compared to Criton’s 4.6/5 from 21 reviews. Both have zero reviews in the last 6 months, so recent performance may be less visible. LIKE MAGIC’s 99% likelihood to recommend surpasses Criton’s 92%.
Segment ratings show LIKE MAGIC holds perfect or near-perfect marks in extended stays (5.0/5 from 13 reviews) and city center hotels (4.9/5 from 11), while Criton scores highest among boutique hotels (4.9/5) and city center hotels (5.0/5). Resorts rate Criton lower (4.2/5) versus LIKE MAGIC’s 5/5 but the latter has only 1 resort review.
LIKE MAGIC’s rating advantage is robust across multiple hotel types and review volume.
Edge: LIKE MAGIC.
LIKE MAGIC publishes a base price of $700 with no trial or freemium available. This transparent pricing suits hotels budgeting for turnkey digital guest journey platforms with predictable costs.
Criton does not publicly disclose pricing, nor offer trials or freemium. Prospective buyers must contact sales for quotes, which may delay evaluation and comparison.
The lack of publicly available pricing for Criton limits direct cost comparisons, though both products do not charge per room or require implementation fees.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Criton and LIKE MAGIC both improve guest engagement but differ fundamentally in approach. Criton excels as a branded mobile app platform with extensive PMS integrations and local recommendations, ideal for boutique and luxury hotels seeking strong guest content control. LIKE MAGIC offers a web-app that automates the complete guest journey, streamlining operations and reducing staff workload, making it the best fit for extended stay, serviced apartments, and city center hotels focused on operational efficiency.
Choose Criton if you need deeper integration with established PMS and key systems, want to provide branded, content-rich guest apps, and prioritize personalized local recommendations. Choose LIKE MAGIC if you value ease of use, faster onboarding, a no-install guest experience, and proven operational cost savings supported by case studies showing dramatic staff reductions.
The data supports LIKE MAGIC as the higher-rated, more user-friendly platform with stronger customer support and value perception. Criton remains a compelling choice for hotels that prioritize brand control and integration breadth over rapid automation.
Hotel Guest Apps pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $700/mo |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Communication & Messaging
|
|
|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| App download | ||
| Web-app | ||
|
▾
Content Management
|
|
|
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Guest Profiles | ||
| Local Recommendations | ||
| Web-app | ||
|
▾
Upselling
|
|
|
| Payments | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
|
▾
Request Management
|
|
|
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering | ||
| Mobile Checkout | ||
| Mobile Checkin |
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Like Magic allowed us to operate with just six staff members, without compromising guest experience. The platform is easy to use, fun to work with, and has revolutionized how we ru..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"LIKE MAGIC isn't just a tool for us, it's the backbone of our overall guest experience. If I ever worked somewhere else, I'd bring it with me."
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users say LikeMagic reduces manual work and saves significant time through integrations and automated workflows. The platform is described as helping... Users say LikeMagic reduces manual work and saves significant time through integrations and automated workflows. The platform is described as helping staff focus more on guests by cutting down on repetitive tasks and implementation overhead.
Reviewers like the fast, easy-to-use booking engine and describe it as clear and straightforward for guests and staff. Some also want more capabilitie... Reviewers like the fast, easy-to-use booking engine and describe it as clear and straightforward for guests and staff. Some also want more capabilities and flexibility beyond the current booking experience.
One review says the platform is better suited to B2B needs, but still lacks more advanced corporate functionality. Desired capabilities include bookin... One review says the platform is better suited to B2B needs, but still lacks more advanced corporate functionality. Desired capabilities include booking changes, availability calendars, and features tailored to corporate clients, TMCs, and partners.
Where hoteliers push back
Some reviewers raise concerns about missing or reduced customization options, especially around backoffice branding and guest portal UX. These gaps ma... Some reviewers raise concerns about missing or reduced customization options, especially around backoffice branding and guest portal UX. These gaps matter for hotels that want the app to closely match their brand and service style.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Criton and LIKE MAGIC share many core Hotel Guest Apps features, but each has unique capabilities. Criton offers 15 verified integration partners, while LIKE MAGIC offers 11. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. LIKE MAGIC leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.5/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Criton: No. LIKE MAGIC: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Guest Apps vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Criton has an HT Score of 0 and LIKE MAGIC has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property