The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
dihotel shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, dihotel users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| dihotel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s efficiency, guest satisfaction, and revenue growth. Both dihotel by dihotel and RoomRaccoon PMS aim to streamline operations, but they serve distinctly different hotel segments and offer varying levels of functionality. Your decision hinges on your hotel’s size, complexity, and specific needs.
While dihotel presents itself as a comprehensive PMS, it currently lacks the reviews, recent user feedback, and active integrations that could validate its effectiveness. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, benefits from a large, recent review base and a proven track record with small to mid-sized hotels. Is your hotel ready for a system with extensive features and active support, or does your team need a more straightforward, scalable solution?
Dihotel positions itself as an all-in-one PMS that promises to manage reservations, housekeeping, billing, and more, targeting hotels seeking operational cohesion. However, it has no current reviews, a very limited online presence, and no verified integrations, making its reliability uncertain.
RoomRaccoon is a cloud-based, multi-feature platform with 169 reviews and an impressive 4.88 out of 5 overall rating in the last six months. It offers a broad suite of tools—channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and guest CRM—validated by recent feedback from numerous hoteliers. Do you prioritize a platform with proven user satisfaction and active development?
If your hotel is a small to mid-sized independent property, RoomRaccoon’s extensive set of features, recent positive reviews, and strong support make it the clearer choice. It’s particularly well-suited if you want automation, direct booking enhancements, and revenue optimization without complex implementation.
Conversely, dihotel may appeal if your hotel operates on a large scale or requires a highly customized, enterprise-level PMS. Yet without recent reviews or verified integrations, it’s difficult to assess whether it can meet your operational demands effectively. For most hotels seeking proven results, RoomRaccoon’s recent feedback and active user base speak volumes.
RoomRaccoon’s user experience is highly rated at 4.74/5, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, simple onboarding, and easy staff adoption. Many users note that new team members learn the system quickly, reducing training time and operational disruption.
Dihotel, with a 0/5 rating, provides no available data on usability, onboarding, or user satisfaction. Its lack of reviews and absence of user feedback make it impossible to gauge how easily your team could adopt or operate it. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 51 features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, payment processing, guest CRM, automated night audits, and mobile app support. These features are well-integrated and tailored for hospitality, providing a comprehensive operational toolkit.
Dihotel claims to be a full PMS but offers no specific features or modules publicly available. Without concrete data, it’s impossible to compare feature depth or quality. Clearly, RoomRaccoon leads in feature set. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support and onboarding ratings are 4.61/5 and 4.53/5, respectively, with reviews highlighting quick response times and helpful staff. Many hoteliers appreciate the ongoing support, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting.
Dihotel has no available reviews or support ratings, making it impossible to assess the quality of its customer service. Given the importance of reliable support in PMS selection, RoomRaccoon’s proven service edge is clear. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon boasts 88 verified partners, including popular booking channels, revenue management, EPoS, and payment solutions, enhancing operational flexibility. Many integrations are real-time, which is vital for maintaining accurate availability and rates.
Dihotel offers no verified integrations or partner data, limiting its potential for seamless connectivity. For hotels requiring a connected tech stack, RoomRaccoon’s extensive partner network provides a significant advantage. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s recent reviews show a high satisfaction rate, with an overall rating of 4.88/5 and a likelihood to recommend of 94%. Hoteliers praise its ease of use, automation, and revenue success, especially in small to boutique properties.
Dihotel has no reviews or recent feedback, preventing any comparative rating. Without user validation, the proven satisfaction of RoomRaccoon makes it the better-rated option for most hotels. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Dihotel’s pricing is not publicly available, suggesting it might operate on a bespoke or enterprise model. This lack of transparency makes it difficult for your team to evaluate value upfront.
RoomRaccoon charges $1,000 per month with no implementation or setup fees. Its transparent pricing model aligns with its extensive feature set and active support. For budget-conscious small hotels, this clarity adds value. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core difference: RoomRaccoon offers an active, well-reviewed, feature-rich platform tailored for small to mid-sized hotels, while dihotel remains relatively untested with no recent user feedback or verified integrations.
When to choose RoomRaccoon: If your hotel needs a proven, easy-to-use, cloud-based PMS with integrated booking, channel management, revenue tools, and excellent support, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its recent reviews validate its effectiveness and user satisfaction.
When to choose dihotel: Only consider dihotel if you require a highly customized, enterprise-level system, and are prepared to handle potentially higher costs and risks due to lack of recent validation. For most hotels, RoomRaccoon’s active and positive user base makes it the safer, smarter option.
Final recommendation: For small, independent, or boutique hotels seeking a reliable and feature-rich PMS, RoomRaccoon is the superior choice. Its recent reviews, extensive integrations, and high customer satisfaction levels cement its position as the preferred platform—no contest in today’s market.
This comprehensive comparison aims to guide your decision, focusing on real user data, recent feedback, and functional differences. Your hotel’s success depends on choosing a system that fits your size, needs, and growth plans—RoomRaccoon currently offers the most evidence of delivering those results.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| dihotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, dihotel and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. dihotel and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. dihotel offers 0 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
dihotel: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. dihotel has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor