The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
dihotel shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, dihotel users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| dihotel |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can significantly impact your hotel's operations, guest experience, and revenue. Both dihotel by dihotel and Stayntouch by Stayntouch aim to streamline daily tasks, but they serve different needs and market segments. While dihotel offers a basic, less-reviewed solution, Stayntouch stands out with over 317 recent reviews and a high customer satisfaction score.
The critical question is: which platform aligns better with your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and future growth plans? Let’s compare these two PMS options to help you decide.
Dihotel is a relatively undisclosed player with no recent reviews or active user base, making its performance and support less transparent. Stayntouch, however, boasts a 4.56-star rating from over 317 reviews, with 26 reviews in the last six months, demonstrating ongoing customer engagement and recent product updates.
Both products aim to manage reservations, housekeeping, billing, and reporting, but their market presence diverges sharply. Stayntouch’s extensive review history and global presence make it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven support and feature-rich solutions. Given the current data, is your hotel willing to risk the uncertainty of a lesser-known platform?
If your hotel needs a scalable, multi-property PMS with extensive third-party integrations, go with Stayntouch. Its platform caters to mid-sized to large hotels, boutique properties, and chains, providing customizable modules like revenue management, group bookings, and contactless check-in.
If your hotel is small, operates with straightforward needs, and prefers a less costly, less reviewed option, dihotel might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or clear feature set, it’s harder to justify over Stayntouch, especially considering your hotel’s need for reliable support and ongoing product development.
Stayntouch scores a 4.7/5 for ease of use, with high marks for its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and mobile accessibility. Reviewers praise its user-friendly screens and seamless staff adoption, noting training is straightforward and fast.
In contrast, dihotel records a 0/5 rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews or feedback available. The lack of data on its onboarding or user satisfaction makes it difficult to assess, but the absence of community trust suggests potential usability issues.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 49 features, including revenue management, online check-in, guest profiles, integrated payment processing, digital registration, and mobile apps—features that are crucial for operational automation and guest convenience.
Dihotel provides no documented features, making it impossible to compare directly. The absence of detailed feature data indicates it likely lacks the comprehensive tools necessary for modern hotel management.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support is rated 4.68/5, with reviews highlighting its friendly support team, swift onboarding, and proactive customer service. Recent feedback emphasizes consistent upgrades and effective assistance.
Dihotel’s customer support is unreviewed, providing no concrete ratings or feedback. The lack of recent reviews or support data significantly undermines confidence in its support quality.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integrations, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and other hotel-specific tools. Its open API approach allows extensive third-party connectivity to enhance operational workflows.
Dihotel has no verified partners or integrations listed, limiting its potential for seamless connectivity. For hotels relying on multiple software solutions, Stayntouch’s ecosystem offers a clear advantage.
Edge: Stayntouch.
With over 317 recent reviews, Stayntouch maintains an average rating of 4.56/5, with many praising its intuitive interface, reliability, and customer support. Hotels across segments, especially boutique and branded hotels, rate it highly (4.9/5 and 4.93/5 respectively).
Dihotel’s lack of recent reviews and ratings makes it impossible to assess user satisfaction. The newness or obscurity of dihotel means it hasn't built a reputation comparable to Stayntouch.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Dihotel’s pricing is not publicly available, with no trial or subscription details disclosed, making it difficult to evaluate value. Stayntouch charges $800 monthly, without additional implementation fees, offering transparency and predictability.
If budget transparency and clear pricing are priorities, Stayntouch’s published rates and no extra fees provide a more straightforward investment.
The core difference lies in the depth of features, market presence, and user trust. Stayntouch is a well-established, feature-rich platform backed by extensive reviews, ongoing product development, and global support, making it the stronger choice for most hotels.
Choose dihotel only if your hotel operates on extremely limited needs, has minimal expectations for support, and is willing to accept the risks associated with a lesser-known provider lacking recent validation. For hotels looking to modernize their operations with confidence and scalability, Stayntouch delivers clear advantages.
If your priority is a reliable, well-supported PMS with proven integrations and a high user satisfaction record, Stayntouch is the safer, smarter choice. Conversely, if minimal investment and simplicity are your primary goals, dihotel’s unknown status and limited data make it a less appealing option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| dihotel |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, dihotel and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | dihotel |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. dihotel and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. dihotel offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
dihotel: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. dihotel has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor