The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 192 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
DJUBO shines in ease of use and ROI , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Cendyn shines when it comes to support team responsiveness — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Dynamic Pricing and Multi-property management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 192 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $700/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 20 | 172 |
After analyzing 192 verified reviews, DJUBO users most value its , while Cendyn users highlight support team responsiveness, booking engine ease of use, rate plan management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team Responsiveness
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Plan Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-Time Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Booking Notifications Delay
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 5 reviews | #2 28 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #16 0 reviews | #1 66 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 36 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #12 0 reviews | #1 33 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 reviews | #1 96 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 2 reviews | #1 67 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #13 0 reviews | #1 53 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 0 reviews | #1 13 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #13 0 reviews | #1 115 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #3 26 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 5 reviews | #1 9 reviews |
| Middle East | #11 0 reviews | #5 4 reviews |
Choosing the right hotel reservations software can be daunting, especially when comparing two industry leaders like DJUBO and Cendyn CRS. Both products aim to streamline your operations, improve revenue, and enhance guest experiences, but they differ significantly in features, integrations, and market focus. Your decision hinges on specific needs, hotel size, and strategic priorities.
While DJUBO offers an all-in-one platform with a strong presence in Asia-Pacific and a very recent surge in reviews, Cendyn CRS boasts extensive integrations and a broader international footprint, especially in North America. Which of these solutions aligns best with your hotel’s goals and existing systems?
DJUBO and Cendyn CRS both serve as central reservations systems, but they diverge in their core strengths. DJUBO is an integrated hospitality management platform that combines PMS, channel management, booking engine, POS, and revenue tools in one package. It’s favored for its ease of use, affordability, and a more modern interface, with a recent review count of 19 and an impressive 97% likelihood to recommend.
Cendyn CRS, by contrast, is a more traditional, feature-rich CRS with over 136 reviews, mostly recent, and a high overall rating of 4.47/5. It excels in connecting with over 1,000 distribution partners and offers advanced dynamic pricing, content management, and PMS connectivity. Which system offers the operational scope and reliability your hotel needs today?
The key question: Does your property benefit from a holistic platform that covers all core functions, or do you require a highly connected, flexible CRS with extensive partner integration?
If your hotel needs a straightforward, all-in-one management system—especially if you’re in Asia-Pacific, Africa, or North America—DJUBO is the better choice. It’s ideal for independent and boutique hotels seeking an affordable, easy-to-adopt platform with integrated POS, guest feedback, and revenue management tools. Its recent reviews highlight ease of use and responsive support, making it suitable for properties that prioritize operational simplicity.
Conversely, if your hotel relies heavily on extensive distribution, advanced dynamic pricing, or operates in North America and Europe, Cendyn CRS should be your focus. Its deeper integrations, over 1000 partners, and features like content management and geotargeted pricing cater to large, complex properties or chains that need sophisticated rate and inventory control.
In summary, opt for DJUBO if your hotel leans toward streamlined, all-in-one management, and choose Cendyn CRS if your priorities are connectivity, scalability, and advanced rate management.
DJUBO scores higher for ease of use, with a rating of 4.74/5 versus Cendyn’s 4.34/5. Recent reviews praise DJUBO’s intuitive interface, especially its mobile app, and its straightforward onboarding process. Hoteliers mention that DJUBO's modular structure makes it simple to adopt and operate, with support staff praised for responsiveness.
Cendyn CRS, while generally user-friendly, has some complaints about interface issues, particularly with connection delays and slow web portals. Users note that support can be inconsistent, which impacts the overall experience.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers a broader set of features—16 exclusive to it—including a channel manager, multi-currency, multilingual support, PMS, booking engine, POS, group booking, revenue management, and guest feedback tools. Its feature count totals 30, making it a versatile, all-in-one platform.
Cendyn, with 7 unique features such as dynamic pricing, content management, PMS connectivity, and geotargeted pricing, focuses more on rate flexibility and distribution. Its feature set is tailored for larger properties needing sophisticated rate and inventory controls.
Ultimately, DJUBO’s richer feature set provides more operational tools out-of-the-box, giving it the edge for hotels wanting comprehensive management.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support ratings (4.61/5) are slightly higher than Cendyn’s (4.54/5), and recent reviews highlight its proactive, responsive team. Hoteliers praise DJUBO’s post-sale support for being timely and helpful, especially during onboarding.
Cendyn’s support is also well-rated, but some reviews mention delays in issue resolution and inconsistent responsiveness. Users have expressed frustration with support responsiveness and interface glitches, impacting daily operations.
Edge: DJUBO.
Cendyn boasts over 116 verified partners, including major global distribution channels like Tripadvisor, Siteminder, and many property management systems. Its ecosystem is extensive, supporting large-scale, multi-channel distribution needs.
DJUBO has only 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, but it covers core functionalities well enough for smaller hotels. Its limited integrations may be a drawback for hotels with complex distribution requirements.
Edge: Cendyn CRS.
DJUBO’s recent reviews, primarily from small to mid-sized hotels, reflect a perfect 5/5 rating and a 97% recommendation rate, with hotel segments like independent properties rating it highly. Its ease of use and affordability resonate well with boutique and regional hotels.
Cendyn CRS, with more reviews, especially from luxury and chain hotels, maintains a solid 4.47/5 rating and 89% recommendation rate. Larger hotels value its advanced features, though some note interface issues.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly list pricing, but its model appears to be modular and potentially more affordable for small to mid-sized hotels. Its no-implementation fee and no-trial policy suggest transparency and flexibility.
Cendyn CRS charges a base price of $700/month, with no free tier or trial. Its cost is more suited for larger hotels or chains with a bigger budget for advanced capabilities.
In terms of overall value, DJUBO offers a more cost-effective entry point for smaller properties, while Cendyn’s investment suits larger, more complex operations.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive integrations, complex multi-property management, or advanced rate customization.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or in regions with limited Cendyn presence.
DJUBO offers a straightforward, integrated platform designed for small to mid-sized properties, emphasizing ease of use, affordability, and quick onboarding. Its recent review volume and high rating make it a trusted choice for independent hotels and resorts seeking simplicity.
Cendyn CRS provides a comprehensive, highly connected solution with extensive integrations and advanced rate management features. It’s best suited for large properties, chains, or hotels with complex distribution and revenue strategies seeking scalability.
If operational simplicity and recent positive feedback are your priorities, DJUBO is the clear choice. For extensive distribution, customization, and scalability, Cendyn CRS is more appropriate.
In conclusion, choose DJUBO for smaller, independent properties prioritizing ease and value. Opt for Cendyn CRS if your hotel operates at scale and needs deep connectivity and control.
This comparison should guide your decision, aligning your hotel’s specific operational needs with the strengths of each platform.
According to HTR's product database, Djubo (CRS) and Cendyn CRS share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Content management | ||
| Dynamic Pricing | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-property management | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| Point of Sale | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Pegasus CRS has ensured that our direct booking channels remain competitive at all times. We create and update all our rate plans first in the CRS and then we distribute these to o..."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The support team’s promptness and effectiveness are frequently praised. Users appreciate the quick response times and professional assistance in resol... The support team’s promptness and effectiveness are frequently praised. Users appreciate the quick response times and professional assistance in resolving issues, which enhances their overall experience with the system.
The booking engine by Pegasus is frequently mentioned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, both for hotel staff and guests. Users appreciate how... The booking engine by Pegasus is frequently mentioned for its simplicity and user-friendliness, both for hotel staff and guests. Users appreciate how easy it is to create rate plans, manage reservations, and navigate the system, which significantly streamlines the booking process.
Many reviews note the effectiveness of Pegasus in handling rate plan configuration, offering extensive customizability to suit different hotel needs.... Many reviews note the effectiveness of Pegasus in handling rate plan configuration, offering extensive customizability to suit different hotel needs. This includes deriving rates from existing plans and making bulk updates, which improves revenue management.
Where hoteliers push back
Some users feel that certain aspects of the booking engine and rate management features could benefit from greater customization. Suggestions include... Some users feel that certain aspects of the booking engine and rate management features could benefit from greater customization. Suggestions include more flexibility in layout design and the ability to integrate personalized modifications without extensive support intervention.
Some reviews highlight interface problems, particularly with integration systems like SiteMinder. Users mention the need for regular refreshes and occ... Some reviews highlight interface problems, particularly with integration systems like SiteMinder. Users mention the need for regular refreshes and occasional connectivity disruptions, which lead to inconsistencies in rate and inventory management.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Djubo (CRS) and Cendyn CRS share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Djubo (CRS) offers 3 verified integration partners, while Cendyn CRS offers 116. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Djubo (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Djubo (CRS): No. Cendyn CRS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. DJUBO has an HT Score of 0 and Cendyn has 88. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor