The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 76 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
DJUBO shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Guest Feedback Management.
Aven Hospitality shines when it comes to ease of use and user experience — especially for brand properties (4.5/5) , with exclusive features like Geotargeted pricing module and TMC Management.
Side-by-side ratings based on 76 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 20 | 56 |
After analyzing 76 verified reviews, DJUBO users most value its , while Aven Hospitality users highlight ease of use and user experience, connectivity and distribution reach, innovation and technology updates. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and User Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Connectivity and Distribution Reach
▾
|
|
|
+
Innovation and Technology Updates
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine Performance
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customer Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical Issues and Integration
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Reservations Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 5 reviews | #11 3 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #16 0 reviews | #6 26 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 15 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #12 0 reviews | #2 6 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #10 3 reviews | #7 20 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #11 2 reviews | #3 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #13 0 reviews | #3 20 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #10 0 reviews | #4 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #13 0 reviews | #2 34 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #6 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 5 reviews | #3 6 reviews |
| Middle East | #11 0 reviews | #2 4 reviews |
As you evaluate hotel reservations systems, your primary concern is finding a platform that enhances operational efficiency, boosts revenue, and offers reliable support. Both DJUBO and Aven Hospitality aim to streamline your reservation process, but their approaches differ significantly. DJUBO is an all-in-one platform combining PMS, channel management, booking engine, and more, while Aven Hospitality’s SynXis acts as a centralized reservation hub with extensive connectivity. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
DJUBO is a comprehensive cloud-based management system that integrates core hotel operations like PMS, channel management, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback into a single platform. It’s designed to reduce complexity and give your team real-time visibility across functions, making it ideal for independent hotels or multi-property groups seeking all-in-one management.
Aven Hospitality’s SynXis focuses primarily on reservation management and distribution, offering a highly connected platform with robust OTA integration and an advanced booking engine. It excels at managing multiple properties and optimizing direct bookings but does not bundle PMS or POS functionalities, making it better suited for hotels that prioritize distribution and reservation efficiency.
Where your hotel needs a unified platform that controls everything from front desk to back-office, DJUBO is the clear choice. Conversely, if your focus is on maximizing online distribution and reservation accuracy, SynXis is more tailored to those demands. Are you looking for a full management solution or a reservation-centric platform?
If your hotel needs a unified management system that covers reservations, POS, revenue, and guest feedback, DJUBO is the better fit. It’s especially suitable for independent properties or hotel groups that want operational control under a single roof, with its 19 features and high user ratings (5/5 overall, 97% likelihood to recommend).
If your hotel’s priority is connectivity to OTAs, a reliable booking engine, and scalable reservation management for multiple properties, go with Aven Hospitality’s SynXis. Its 50 reviews and 80.5 rating reflect strong user satisfaction (4.2/5 overall, 85% recommended), especially for hotels focused on distribution and direct bookings.
In summary, choose DJUBO if you need an all-in-one platform that manages every aspect of hotel operations. Opt for SynXis if reservation accuracy, OTA connectivity, and revenue optimization are your top priorities.
DJUBO’s UI scores a solid 4.74/5, with reviews highlighting its ease of use, especially its mobile app, which users find intuitive. Onboarding is rated 4.61/5, and customer support is highly rated at 4.61/5, with reviewers praising its responsiveness and helpfulness.
Aven Hospitality’s SynXis has a slightly lower ease of use score at 4.38/5, but reviews still commend its user-friendly interface and connectivity features. Onboarding is rated 4.08/5, and support is generally viewed as good, though some reviews mention delays and slow issue resolution.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO offers 17 features, including a channel manager, multi-currency, property management, booking engine, POS, revenue management, and guest feedback, covering comprehensive management needs. Its mobile app and revenue modules are standout tools not available in Aven Hospitality.
Aven Hospitality features three unique integrations: geotargeted pricing, TMC management, and content management, which are not found in DJUBO. While it focuses on reservation and distribution, it lacks the broader operational features DJUBO provides.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO’s support scores 4.61/5, with reviewers noting its prompt, knowledgeable, and proactive customer service. Users frequently mention post-sale support as a strong point, with some calling the support team “responsive and helpful.”
Aven Hospitality’s support scores 4.07/5, but reviews indicate some dissatisfaction with delays and lack of responsiveness. While some users appreciate the support for connectivity issues, others report slower resolutions and less proactive service.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO integrates with 3 verified partners, including Tripadvisor and Simplotel, offering essential connectivity for small to mid-sized hotels. Its limited integrations can be a constraint if you need extensive third-party system links.
Aven Hospitality boasts 80 verified partners, including major systems like Visual Matrix PMS, Profitroom, Koddi, and WebRezPro. Its broad integration ecosystem supports large-scale operations with diverse technology stacks.
Edge: Aven Hospitality.
DJUBO’s reviews are recent and overwhelmingly positive, with a 5/5 overall rating and 97% likelihood to recommend, especially among independent properties. Its high NPS score of 9.16/5 underscores strong user satisfaction.
Aven Hospitality’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.2/5 overall, with some criticism regarding customer support and system stability. It is favored by larger hotels and resorts but has fewer recent reviews for validation.
Edge: DJUBO.
DJUBO does not publicly disclose its pricing, but it offers a flexible, modular approach without implementation fees or freemium options. Its pricing is likely tailored based on modules selected and hotel size.
Aven Hospitality charges a base fee of $400/month, with no free tier or trial options. This fixed cost makes budgeting predictable but may be high for small hotels seeking only reservation management.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
DJUBO stands out as a comprehensive, all-in-one hotel management platform with high user ratings, a strong recent review base, and a broad feature set tailored for operational control. Its ease of use and customer support make it ideal for independent or multi-property hotels seeking to streamline their entire management process.
Aven Hospitality’s SynXis excels at reservation management and distribution, especially for hotels with complex distribution needs or large portfolios. Its extensive integrations and reliable connectivity make it suitable for properties that focus heavily on OTA reach and direct booking optimization.
If your hotel needs a full management system, DJUBO provides greater value and recent positive feedback. For reservation-centric operations with a focus on distribution, Aven Hospitality’s SynXis is a solid choice, though it comes with higher costs and fewer features outside reservations.
Note: Based on the more recent and numerous reviews, DJUBO is the stronger choice overall, especially for hotels seeking operational control and highly rated customer support.
Hotel Reservations Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $400/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Djubo (CRS) and SynXis Central Reservation System share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Content management | ||
| Geotargeted pricing module | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Point of Sale | ||
| Property Management System | ||
| TMC Management |
Showing top differences. 8 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigatio... Many users highlight SynXis CR's intuitive interface and ease of use for managing rates, reservations, and multiple properties. The seamless navigation and efficient design make it simple for hoteliers to perform complex tasks with minimal support. Users particularly appreciate the ability to make updates easily across multiple properties, which saves significant time.
Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel... Reviewers consistently praise SynXis for its superior connectivity to multiple OTAs and partners, which improves distribution reach and direct channel conversions. The platform offers high reliability and consistent performance for various distribution channels. The integration with PMS and RMS systems is seamless, allowing hoteliers to maintain data integrity across platforms.
Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to Syn... Sabre's commitment to continuous innovation is well-received by users, who appreciate the regular updates and new capabilities being introduced to SynXis. These updates reflect the company’s dedication to staying ahead of industry trends and addressing evolving customer needs.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem res... Customer support has a mixed reception; while some users find the support team helpful and responsive, others report significant delays in problem resolution and long wait times. Additionally, transitioning towards self-service support options has presented challenges for users needing quick and effective assistance.
While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customizati... While SynXis is recognized for its robust functionality, users express a need for quicker validation of enhancement requests and increased customization options, especially for unique property needs. The delay in implementing new features and the limited scope for customization are recurring themes in the reviews.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Djubo (CRS) and SynXis Central Reservation System share many core Hotel Reservations Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Djubo (CRS) offers 3 verified integration partners, while SynXis Central Reservation System offers 80. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Djubo (CRS) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Djubo (CRS): No. SynXis Central Reservation System: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Reservations Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. DJUBO has an HT Score of 0 and Aven Hospitality has 81. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor