The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 887 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Dormakaba Kaba Ltd shines .
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 887 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $900/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 887 |
After analyzing 887 verified reviews, Dormakaba Kaba Ltd users most value its , while Mews users highlight ease of use, automation and integrations, customizability and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Integrations
▾
|
|
|
+
Customizability and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing and Invoicing
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Multi-Property Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 329 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 397 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 45 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #3 49 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #1 483 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #5 220 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 170 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 130 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #8 106 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #1 660 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #10 17 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #28 8 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) can feel overwhelming, especially when comparing Dormakaba Ilc and Mews. While both aim to streamline operations, their core offerings diverge sharply. Dormakaba Ilc offers little to no recent user reviews or ratings, suggesting minimal market presence, whereas Mews boasts over 750 reviews, a high rating of 4.62/5, and an active customer base. Are you ready to focus on the more proven, user-rated platform?
Dormakaba Ilc presents as a virtually unreviewed system with no recent feedback or ratings, making it impossible to gauge its real-world performance or reliability. Mews, by contrast, benefits from over 750 reviews, including 98 in the past six months, showing active use and ongoing support. Mews’s high NPS score of 9.12/10 and a 93% likelihood to recommend underscore its reputation among users. Do you want to rely on a product with proven customer satisfaction?
If your hotel values a system with extensive user validation, ongoing updates, and a strong reputation, go with Mews. It’s trusted by diverse hotel types, from boutique hotels to large chains, and has a track record of increasing operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. If your hotel needs a modern, fully integrated PMS with a broad feature set, Mews is the clear choice. Dormakaba Ilc’s lack of recent reviews and minimal market presence make it a risky, unproven option; you should consider alternative solutions.
Mews earns a 4.7/5 ease of use rating, supported by positive reviews praising its intuitive, modern interface and straightforward onboarding. Conversely, Dormakaba Ilc has a zero-star rating in ease of use, with no recent feedback to suggest it’s user-friendly or easy to implement. Support is nonexistent for Dormakaba, while Mews’s customer support scores 4.27/5, with reviews highlighting helpful onboarding and ongoing assistance. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers a robust suite with 59 features, including multi-lingual and multi-currency support, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, integrated payments, and extensive reporting tools—many tailored to modern hotel needs. Dormakaba Ilc provides no detailed features or unique capabilities, suggesting a very limited or outdated offering. With a broad feature set and continual innovation, Mews clearly has the edge in functionality.
Mews’s support is rated 4.27/5, with recent reviews affirming helpful onboarding, rapid issue resolution, and excellent ongoing assistance. Dormakaba Ilc, with zero reviews and no support ratings, provides no evidence of customer support quality. Based on available data, Mews’s support is a significant advantage. Edge: Mews.
Mews integrates with over 336 verified partners, including channel managers, payment systems, and revenue tools, enabling a highly customizable ecosystem. Dormakaba Ilc, with only 1 verified partner, offers negligible integration options, limiting its adaptability. For hotels seeking a flexible, connected system, Mews’s extensive ecosystem makes it the obvious choice. Edge: Mews.
Mews’s overall rating of 4.62/5 stems from 758 reviews across a variety of hotel segments, with recent feedback highly positive. Dormakaba Ilc has no ratings or recent reviews, indicating little to no current user engagement. Hotels that prioritize proven satisfaction and peer validation should opt for Mews. Edge: Mews.
Dormakaba Ilc’s pricing information is unavailable, suggesting either a bespoke or outdated model. Mews charges a base fee of $900, with no implementation or monthly per-room fees, making its pricing transparent and predictable. For budget planning and clear value, Mews’s pricing model offers more confidence.
The core difference is market presence: Mews is a proven, actively reviewed platform, while Dormakaba Ilc has no current reviews or recent customer feedback. For hoteliers prioritizing reliability, user satisfaction, and extensive features, Mews is the recommended choice. Dormakaba’s limited data and absence of recent validation suggest it’s not suitable for hotels aiming for growth or digital transformation.
Choose Mews if you want a system with proven impact, comprehensive features, and ongoing support. If your hotel’s needs are minimal, or you rely on legacy systems, Dormakaba may suffice—but be aware of its unverified status. For modern, scalable, and supported hotel operations, Mews is the clear leader.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $900/mo |
According to HTR's product database, dormakaba Ilc and Mews PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Dormakaba Kaba Ltd |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 47 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find... Many reviews highlight the user-friendliness of Mews, citing its intuitive interface that simplifies tasks across various hotel operations. Users find the platform easy to navigate, which aids in quicker team onboarding and daily use.
Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing erro... Reviews frequently praise Mews for its automation of routine tasks like check-in, billing, and invoicing, reducing manual workload and minimizing errors. Users appreciate the extensive integration options with other tools, which streamline overall operations and enhance efficiency.
Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they... Mews allows customization to fit diverse business needs, from rate structures to integration setups. Users appreciate this flexibility, although they note room for improvement in adapting complex booking conditions and enhancing user-friendly navigation for settings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billi... Users point out that while Mews offers efficient billing processes, there are complexities and areas needing improvement, such as handling group billings, splits, and providing more customizable invoice formats. This can affect the ease of financial operations within the system.
While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting featu... While Mews provides solid reporting and analytics functionalities, several reviews mention the need for more customizable and flexible reporting features. Users express the desire for more granular data insights, particularly in reservations and revenue analysis.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. dormakaba Ilc and Mews PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. dormakaba Ilc offers 1 verified integration partners, while Mews PMS offers 335. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
dormakaba Ilc: No. Mews PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Dormakaba Kaba Ltd has an HT Score of 0 and Mews has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor