The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 162 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
e4jconnect shines in ROI and onboarding , with exclusive features like Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Centralized Messaging.
Preno shines when it comes to user-friendly interface , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 162 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 2 | 160 |
After analyzing 162 verified reviews, e4jconnect users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, customer support, channel management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Channel Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Application
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 80 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #32 15 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #45 1 reviews | #46 1 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #39 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #14 65 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #71 0 reviews | #12 53 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #21 17 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #8 26 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #27 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #43 1 reviews | #25 13 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #20 3 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #13 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) depends on your hotel’s unique needs, particularly around ease of use, feature set, and support. Both e4jConnect/VikBooking and Preno address core management tasks—booking, guest communication, and reporting—but their strengths diverge significantly. e4jConnect offers a highly customizable, multi-lingual platform with extensive automation, while Preno emphasizes simplicity, cloud accessibility, and integration with popular tools. Which features matter most to your team?
Both systems aim to streamline hotel operations, but they serve different hotel types and operational scales. e4jConnect is tailored for properties needing detailed automation, multi-lingual support, and advanced reporting. Preno excels with hotels seeking straightforward, cloud-based management with easy access from anywhere. Their review counts show Preno's stronger market presence, with 144 recent reviews and a 4.73-star rating, compared to e4jConnect's 2 reviews and a 0 score—indicating better recent user satisfaction.
e4jConnect is best for hotels that require extensive automation, customized integrations, and multi-lingual capabilities. Preno appeals to hotels prioritizing ease, speed, and seamless, cloud-based operation. Given the recent reviews and higher overall rating, Preno’s platform is more proven and trusted among hoteliers. Are you ready to see which system aligns with your hotel’s priorities?
If your hotel needs a simple, intuitive interface with strong integration capabilities, go with Preno. It’s suited for boutique hotels, motels, and properties that want to minimize training and operational complexity. If, however, your team requires advanced automation, multilingual support, and detailed reporting, e4jConnect’s highly customizable platform might be a better fit—though it’s less proven in recent user feedback.
Preno’s high user ratings, recent reviews, and broader integration options make it the safer choice for most hotels looking for reliable, scalable management. Conversely, e4jConnect’s niche features may appeal if your operations demand specialized tools like digital registration, shift planning, or multi-lingual support. Given the current review data, Preno is the clear leader for most hoteliers.
Ease of use is critical for staff adoption and operational efficiency. e4jConnect’s UI scores a perfect 5/5, praised for its user-friendly backend, intuitive interface, and straightforward management dashboards. Its onboarding and support also rate a perfect 5/5, with reviewers highlighting its smooth setup and unbeatable support.
Preno slightly edges out in user-friendliness with a 4.78/5 rating, celebrated for its clean, simple interface and ease of navigation. Users report that Preno’s platform is easy for staff at all skill levels to learn, helping reduce training time. Edge: e4jConnect.
e4jConnect boasts 14 unique features, including multi-lingual support, automated reminders, digital registration, and shift planning—many of which are absent in Preno. Preno offers 16 features, including real-time status updates, revenue management, and a housekeeping module, with some features like automated night audits and native email marketing standing out.
While Preno has more integration capabilities and a broader feature set overall, e4jConnect’s suite is tailored for more complex, automated operations. That said, Preno’s additional features might be more aligned with typical hotel needs. Edge: Preno.
Both products excel in support, each earning near-perfect ratings—e4jConnect’s support scores a 5/5, and Preno’s support is rated 4.8/5. e4jConnect’s reviews praise its "unbeatable" support, emphasizing quick, helpful responses and smooth onboarding. Some users note that e4jConnect’s support staff go above and beyond, ensuring minimal downtime.
Preno’s support also receives high marks, with users highlighting its responsiveness and proactive assistance, especially during onboarding. Reviewers appreciate Preno’s support team for “constantly reviewing the software and listening to user feedback.” Edge: e4jConnect.
Preno’s user base is more extensive, with 144 recent reviews and an average rating of 4.73/5, reflecting widespread satisfaction. Its reviews often mention its ease, support, and integration with other tools like Xero and SiteMinder.
e4jConnect’s limited review count (2 reviews) and a 0/5 rating suggest a lack of recent positive feedback, making it difficult to gauge current satisfaction. Given this, Preno’s higher ratings and recent positive reviews clearly position it as the more trusted option among hoteliers. Edge: Preno.
e4jConnect’s base price is $100 per month, with no free tier, trial, or implementation fees. Preno’s cost starts at $800 per month, also without free or trial options. The significant price difference reflects their target markets and feature depth, with Preno’s premium pricing aligning with its broader feature set and market presence.
If budget constraints are critical, e4jConnect offers a cost-effective solution, but Preno’s pricing appears justified by its extensive integrations and features. There’s no trial info available for either; consider your budget and feature requirements carefully.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, has straightforward operations, or prefers a simple, cloud-based PMS. e4jConnect’s advanced features are designed for larger or more complex properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive automation, multi-lingual support, or detailed shift planning. Preno fits best with properties that want a straightforward yet powerful PMS solution.
The core difference lies in scope: Preno offers a broader, more recent, and highly-rated platform suited for most hotels, especially those seeking simplicity and strong integration. e4jConnect provides specialized tools for automation, multilingual support, and detailed operational control—better suited for larger or more complex properties.
If your hotel values proven reliability, a large user base, and recent positive reviews, Preno is the clear choice. For properties requiring advanced automation and multi-lingual features, e4jConnect could be a fit, but its limited recent reviews make it less reliable currently.
In summary, for most hotels, Preno’s higher recent ratings, broader feature set, and extensive integrations make it the stronger option. e4jConnect remains niche, best suited for properties with specific automation or multilingual needs that justify its higher complexity and cost.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $100/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System and Preno share 14 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reminders | ||
| Centralized Messaging | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it... Preno is frequently commended for its intuitive and clean interface, which makes it simple to navigate. Users across various tech skill levels find it easy to learn and use, which reduces the time and cost associated with staff training.
The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during wee... The support team is typically praised for being responsive and helpful, although some reviews indicate that there can be delays, especially during weekends or busy periods. Responsiveness and direct contact with support staff are valued highly.
Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings... Preno’s seamless integration with channel managers like SiteMinder allows for real-time updates and has been attributed to eliminating double bookings. Users commend this functionality for improving operational efficiency and enhancing bookings management.
Where hoteliers push back
Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better str... Preno's reporting functions receive mixed reviews, with some users satisfied with its ease of use, while others desire deeper analytics for better strategic decision-making. Some users expressed a need for customized reporting features.
Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with... Although some users laud Preno's features, there is a call for more robust mobile app capabilities. Reviews suggest that enhancing the mobile app with offline functionality and more feature depth would improve usability, especially for managers on the go.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System and Preno share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System offers 1 verified integration partners, while Preno offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
E4jConnect/VikBooking - Property Management System: No. Preno: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. e4jconnect has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor