The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 128 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eRevMax shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.7/5) , with exclusive features like PMS connectivity and Analytics dashboard.
Intobis shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 128 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 128 | 0 |
After analyzing 128 verified reviews, eRevMax users most value its support team, operational efficiency, rate parity, while Intobis users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Intobis |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Rate Parity
▾
|
|
|
+
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Technical Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Analytics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Interface
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Intobis |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #17 21 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #8 59 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #5 35 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #10 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Intobis |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #8 52 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #7 55 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 35 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #8 18 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Intobis |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #9 17 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #9 40 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 14 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #3 42 reviews | — |
Choosing between RateTiger by eRevMax and Intobis means evaluating a product with a proven track record in hotel channel management versus a tool that offers AI-driven review analysis. RateTiger, with over 115 recent reviews and a 4.7/5 rating, provides a comprehensive solution trusted worldwide. Intobis, despite its promise, has no recent reviews or user feedback, making it difficult to assess for your hotel’s needs. Do you want a well-established platform with extensive hotel integrations or an untested AI review platform?
RateTiger solves the core hotel distribution problem—syncing rates and availability across multiple channels to maximize occupancy. Intobis, on the other hand, primarily focuses on review management and customer sentiment insights, which may complement distribution but doesn’t directly address channel management. Are you prioritizing distribution control or customer feedback analytics?
If your hotel needs reliable, real-time distribution across a broad network of channels with proven integrations, RateTiger is the clear choice. It supports over 70 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and regional channels, making it ideal for hotels aiming to increase online visibility and revenue.
If your team is looking to improve customer satisfaction through review analysis or predictive insights, Intobis’s AI-driven review summarization and tailored recommendations might seem appealing. However, with zero recent reviews and no evidence of hotel-specific features, it’s not a viable solution for distribution-focused hotels right now.
For hoteliers seeking a platform that enhances operational efficiency and revenue, RateTiger’s extensive features and proven market presence make it the stronger option. Intobis may be more suitable for other industries or businesses focused primarily on customer feedback rather than distribution.
RateTiger’s user interface is rated 4.39/5, with many users finding it intuitive once familiarized but acknowledging some outdated visuals and a steep learning curve for new users. Onboarding is rated 4.46/5, and support is generally praised, though some reviews mention slow responses during peak times.
Intobis has no available ratings or reviews, so assessing its ease of use is impossible. Given the complexity of distribution management, a platform with proven usability like RateTiger is preferable.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger boasts 10 features exclusive to its platform, including PMS connectivity, analytics dashboards, multi-currency support, centralized user management, and bulk updates. These features are designed specifically for hotel distribution, enabling streamlined operations and data-driven decision-making.
Intobis offers no specific features listed for hotel distribution or management, focusing instead on review analysis. Without dedicated hotel features or integrations, it cannot match RateTiger’s depth.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s support team is rated 4.61/5, with reviews highlighting high responsiveness and efficiency. Users commend the support for resolving issues promptly, although some mention delays during busy periods. Recent reviews point to consistent service quality, reinforcing confidence in their support.
Intobis offers no customer support ratings or recent feedback, making it impossible to evaluate its responsiveness or quality. For critical distribution management, reliable support is essential—RateTiger clearly leads here.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger integrates with over 70 verified partners, including major OTAs, GDS, and PMS systems like Visual Matrix and HotelTime, ensuring extensive distribution reach. This wide network is a critical advantage for hotels seeking to maximize exposure and streamline operations across multiple channels.
Intobis has no listed integrations or verified partners, limiting its utility for hotels that rely on a broad distribution network. Without integrations, the platform’s relevance for channel management is questionable.
Edge: RateTiger.
RateTiger’s 115 reviews in the last six months with a 4.7/5 rating suggest strong satisfaction, especially among hotels of various sizes and segments. Hotels consistently praise its reliability, ease of use, and direct impact on revenue growth.
Intobis has no recent reviews or ratings, so hotel feedback cannot be assessed. Given the volume and recency of RateTiger’s reviews, it’s the better-rated platform for hoteliers today.
Edge: RateTiger.
Both products do not publicly disclose pricing details, which is common for enterprise solutions. RateTiger operates on a quote basis, often with no implementation fees and no monthly flat rates, but specific costs depend on hotel size and needs.
Intobis’s pricing information is unavailable, making it difficult to compare value directly. For hotels seeking transparent pricing, RateTiger’s flexibility and widespread use suggest a more predictable investment.
Not ideal if your hotel is small and only needs basic distribution or prefers a simple, affordable solution without complex features.
Not ideal if your hotel’s primary goal is distribution or revenue management, especially given the lack of recent reviews or proven integration.
RateTiger stands out as a well-established, feature-rich channel manager with a proven track record. Its extensive integrations, high support ratings, and broad hotel user base make it a reliable choice for properties aiming to optimize distribution and revenue.
Intobis, while potentially valuable for review analysis, offers no recent hotel-focused reviews or verified features. Its lack of demonstrated hotel distribution capabilities and market presence make it unsuitable for your hotel’s core needs today.
If your priority is maximizing online visibility and operational control, choose RateTiger. For a platform that might support review insights in the future, keep an eye on Intobis, but currently, it’s not a recommended solution.
According to HTR's product database, RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) and Intobis share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Intobis |
|---|---|---|
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| PMS connectivity |
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Although the product's support team receives overall positive feedback, some users suggest improvements for quicker issue resolution and consistent av... Although the product's support team receives overall positive feedback, some users suggest improvements for quicker issue resolution and consistent availability.
The integration between eRevMax's Booking Engine and Channel Manager has enhanced operational efficiency by streamlining booking processes.
Maintaining rate parity across all OTAs is noted as a significant benefit, ensuring that guests see consistent pricing regardless of booking platform,... Maintaining rate parity across all OTAs is noted as a significant benefit, ensuring that guests see consistent pricing regardless of booking platform, which boosts trust and potentially occupancy rates.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviews mention recurring technical issues like synchronization problems and availability update failures, though users acknowledge that support is pr... Reviews mention recurring technical issues like synchronization problems and availability update failures, though users acknowledge that support is prompt in handling such cases.
The comprehensive reporting and analytics tools are praised for providing valuable insights into booking trends, enabling hotels to make data-driven d... The comprehensive reporting and analytics tools are praised for providing valuable insights into booking trends, enabling hotels to make data-driven decisions to maximize revenue and optimize strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) and Intobis share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) offers 70 verified integration partners, while Intobis offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) leads in ease of use at 4.4/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax): No. Intobis: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eRevMax has an HT Score of 67 and Intobis has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor