The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 1,572 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Cloudbeds shines in calendar and reservation management — especially for bed & breakfast properties (4.6/5).
eRevMax shines in support responsiveness and issue resolution — especially for vacation rental properties (4.9/5).
Side-by-side ratings based on 1,572 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1,443 | 129 |
After analyzing 1,572 verified reviews, Cloudbeds users most value its calendar and reservation management, reporting, analytics, and dashboards, direct booking engine and website/digital guest engagement, while eRevMax users highlight support responsiveness and issue resolution, integration with opera/pms systems, booking engine performance. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Calendar and reservation management
▾
|
+
Support responsiveness and issue resolution
▾
|
|
+
Reporting, analytics, and dashboards
▾
|
+
Integration with Opera/PMS systems
▾
|
|
+
Direct booking engine and website/digital guest engagement
▾
|
+
Booking engine performance
▾
|
|
+
Multi-property and scalability
▾
|
+
Automation and workflow enhancements
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support responsiveness and access to humans
▾
|
−
Reporting and analytics gaps
▾
|
|
−
Payments, deposits, and billing/invoicing
▾
|
−
Outdated product experience
▾
|
|
−
Mobile app limitations
▾
|
−
Glitches and unreliable features
▾
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 675 reviews | #19 21 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #5 179 reviews | #9 56 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 48 reviews | #6 38 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #11 4 reviews | #8 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 566 reviews | #10 52 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 230 reviews | #8 55 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 117 reviews | #8 35 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #2 99 reviews | #8 18 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #1 441 reviews | #9 17 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 188 reviews | #10 40 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #4 342 reviews | #11 14 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #7 15 reviews | #4 43 reviews |
Cloudbeds Channel Manager and RateTiger by eRevMax both solve the fundamental challenge of distributing room inventory and rates across multiple online travel agencies (OTAs) and direct channels, reducing manual work and overbooking risk. They achieve this by synchronizing availability, rates, and bookings in real time. However, these products diverge significantly in their scope and market position.
Cloudbeds is an all-in-one platform combining channel management with a full property management system (PMS), booking engine, and revenue tools. It targets a broad spectrum of properties, especially small to medium independents, hostels, and boutique hotels seeking unified operations and AI-enhanced revenue management. RateTiger is a dedicated channel manager focused on connectivity and distribution with a large OTA network, preferred by hotels looking primarily for robust channel reach and real-time rate parity, often in midscale to luxury segments.
Both products aim to help hotels maximize occupancy and revenue through better online distribution, but Cloudbeds emphasizes operational integration and growth enablement, while RateTiger emphasizes breadth of connections and distribution efficiency.
If you operate a small to medium independent property, hostel, or boutique hotel seeking an integrated system that combines channel management, PMS, and revenue management, Cloudbeds is the stronger fit. This is supported by 1428 reviews with a 4.6 overall rating and a recent rating of 4.8 across 175 reviews in the last six months, reflecting current satisfaction. Its scalability and AI-driven pricing tools particularly benefit properties focused on growth and operational simplification.
For luxury hotels and branded properties prioritizing extensive OTA connectivity and real-time rate parity, RateTiger may be more suitable. It holds 72 verified partners—many high-profile OTAs—and is favored in segments like luxury hotels (11% of users) and city center hotels (12%). However, its review volume is limited to 129 total, with only one in the last six months, so current product quality is less certain. RateTiger’s focus on real-time updates and analytics supports revenue optimization for hotels with established distribution needs.
Data is thinner for very small properties and vacation rentals using RateTiger, where Cloudbeds has stronger representation and ratings. Thus, properties seeking an all-in-one solution will favor Cloudbeds, while those needing wide OTA reach with channel-centric management might consider RateTiger despite fewer recent reviews.
Cloudbeds scores 4.6 for ease of use and 4.5 for onboarding across 1428 reviews, with users praising its intuitive dashboard and rapid staff training. Reviewers highlight simple drag-and-drop reservation management and centralized rate editing that reduce front-desk workload. Some note limitations in the mobile app’s operational features but appreciate the web interface’s speed and clarity.
RateTiger ranks slightly lower at 4.4 ease of use and 4.5 onboarding over 129 reviews. Users say the system is straightforward but mention an outdated interface and a steeper learning curve requiring better training resources. Some find navigation less intuitive, slowing adoption for new staff.
Both products have similar onboarding ratings, but Cloudbeds’ higher ease of use rating and extensive user base suggest front desk and management teams find it more accessible. The volume and recency of Cloudbeds reviews demonstrate consistent usability improvements.
Edge: Even.
Both platforms share 17 core channel management features, including real-time rate and inventory synchronization, OTA mapping, and reservation delivery. Neither product offers unique channel management features that the other lacks, according to verified data.
Cloudbeds extends beyond channel management by integrating PMS, booking engine, payment processing, AI-driven dynamic pricing (Signals), and multi-property management. These capabilities change workflows by reducing the need for multiple systems, enabling front desk teams to manage reservations, payments, and pricing in one place, and equipping revenue managers with predictive analytics.
RateTiger focuses on channel distribution and rate parity, offering extensive OTA connectivity and integration with multiple PMS and RMS systems. It provides detailed analytics and reporting tools supporting revenue optimization but lacks the all-in-one operational depth of Cloudbeds.
While RateTiger’s feature set is channel-centric, Cloudbeds’ broader functionality supports daily hotel operations and revenue strategy more comprehensively.
Edge: Even.
Cloudbeds earns a 4.4 customer support rating with 4.5 for onboarding based on 1428 reviews. Many users praise responsive chat help, accessible knowledge resources, and smooth onboarding. However, about 4 of 17 negative reviews specifically mention slow email responses and lack of immediate phone support for urgent issues, which some hotels find detrimental during operational disruptions.
RateTiger scores 4.6 in customer support and 4.5 onboarding with 129 reviews. Positive feedback centers on proactive, helpful account managers and prompt responses. Some users request clearer communication on issue resolutions and faster availability, indicating room for improvement in support consistency.
Since both have similar onboarding ratings and complementary support strengths, neither decisively outperforms the other.
Edge: Even.
Cloudbeds leads with 208 verified integration partners, compared to RateTiger’s 72. Both share 30 common partners, including HOTELTIME, Net Affinity, Bookassist, TrustYou, and RateGain, covering key PMS, booking engines, and marketing platforms.
Cloudbeds includes unique integrations with modern technology providers like FLEXIPASS Keyless Mobile Access, ManCloud, HiJiffy, and Sirvoy, enhancing guest experience and operational efficiency. This supports properties aiming for a customized, scalable tech stack that extends beyond distribution.
RateTiger integrates with specialized PMS and revenue systems such as Visual Matrix, Profitroom, eviivo, and GuestCentric, aligning with hotels requiring regional and niche channel coverage.
Cloudbeds’ broader integration ecosystem suits hotels seeking end-to-end operational tools alongside distribution, while RateTiger’s focused yet smaller network favors hotels prioritizing established channel connectivity.
Edge: Cloudbeds Channel Manager.
Cloudbeds holds a 4.6 overall rating across 1428 reviews, including 175 in the last six months with a 4.8 rating, reflecting strong, current user satisfaction. RateTiger has a 4.5 overall rating based on 129 reviews, but only one recent review, limiting confidence in current performance.
Segment ratings favor Cloudbeds in most categories with larger review samples: Bed & Breakfast & Inns (4.6 Cloudbeds/4.6 RateTiger), Boutique Hotels (4.6/4.5), Resorts (4.6/4.6), Hostels (4.6/3.6), and Limited Service Hotels (4.6/4.4). RateTiger scores higher only in Extended Stay & Serviced Apartments (4.7 vs 4.6) and Vacation Rentals & Villas (4.9 vs 4.6), but the latter has only 7 RateTiger reviews, reducing reliability.
For luxury hotels, RateTiger has a higher rating (4.6 vs 4.6 Cloudbeds equal) but with fewer reviews (55 vs 230). City Center Hotels rate RateTiger slightly higher (4.6 vs 4.5), but Cloudbeds has four times as many reviews.
Cloudbeds’ larger, recent review volume and slightly higher ratings across key segments indicate stronger operator satisfaction.
Edge: Even.
Cloudbeds publishes a base price of $200 with no implementation fee, monthly flat fee, or per-room charges. There is no trial offering. This straightforward pricing suits small to medium properties budgeting for an all-in-one system.
RateTiger does not publicly disclose pricing but offers a 30-day trial. Without published rates, direct cost comparison is not possible. Prospective buyers must request a quote.
Cloudbeds’ transparent pricing gives buyers clearer cost expectations upfront, favoring budget planning.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Cloudbeds and RateTiger both deliver vital channel management functions, synchronizing rates and availability to reduce overbookings and manual errors. Cloudbeds differentiates itself with an all-in-one platform encompassing PMS, booking engine, AI-driven pricing, and multi-property management, addressing operational efficiency and revenue growth for small to medium independents and hostels. RateTiger excels in channel distribution breadth and analytics, favored by luxury and branded hotels focused on maximizing OTA reach and maintaining rate parity.
Choose Cloudbeds if you want unified hotel operations with AI-powered dynamic pricing, backed by 1428 recent reviews averaging 4.6 overall and a 4.8 rating in the last six months. Its 208 integrations and user-friendly interface support scalable growth and streamlined workflows, ideal for properties seeking operational consolidation and innovation.
Choose RateTiger if your priority is extensive OTA connectivity with over 450 channels, real-time rate updates, and robust analytics for revenue optimization in luxury or branded hotels. Its smaller but focused user base and 72 integrations cater to properties relying on diverse distribution networks and advanced rate parity management, though limited recent review activity suggests cautious evaluation.
The data support a clear distinction: Cloudbeds suits hotels wanting a comprehensive operational platform beyond channel management, while RateTiger suits hotels needing expansive distribution reach with specialized channel focus.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $200/mo | — |
These are the features each vendor has configured, organized by feature group — the same data shown in the vendor dashboard. Expand a group to compare features side by side.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
▾
Rate Management
|
|
|
| Support for Weekly & Monthly Rates | ||
| Yield Rules | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
|
▾
Room Type Mapping
|
|
|
| Channel Self-Mapping | ||
|
▾
Automation & Syncing
|
|
|
| Bulk Updates & Multiple Restrictions | ||
| 2-way real time integrations | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
|
▾
Administration & Settings
|
|
|
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Multi-Currency Support | ||
| Inventory grid | ||
| Integrated Payment Processing | ||
|
▾
Analytics & Reporting
|
|
|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting | ||
|
▾
Other
|
|
|
| Unlimited Channels (no additional cost) |
We analyzed 10 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"I have not worked with a company that has such good customer service as Cloudbeds has. It's miles ahead."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The biggest benefit of Cloudbeds' platform is its flexibility. I can access reporting online from anywhere. Everything is smoother with Cloudbeds."
"With RateTiger, we have managed to take our occupancy to 90%. Their 2-way integration between our PMS and multiple global and regional OTAs has ensured that we sell on the proper c..."
"Cloudbeds is like if Apple made a property management system. The ease of use is super simple and straightforward for guests and our staff. It’s very intuitive and just makes sense..."
"We are working with RateTiger for the last 2 years. When I saw the features and functionalities of RateTiger Channel Manager, I was really impressed. RateTiger Channel Manager help..."
What hoteliers love
The calendar is repeatedly described as the core daily-work tool for front desk teams because it makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, adju... The calendar is repeatedly described as the core daily-work tool for front desk teams because it makes it easy to see room status, move bookings, adjust dates, and manage check-in/check-out. Users like that it simplifies reservation handling and room blocking, though some want split stays, room changes, notes, and editing to be smoother and less error-prone.
Reviewers most often praise Cloudbeds for keeping rates, availability, and reservations synced across OTAs from one place. This reduces manual updates... Reviewers most often praise Cloudbeds for keeping rates, availability, and reservations synced across OTAs from one place. This reduces manual updates, lowers overbooking risk, and saves staff time spent jumping between extranets. A few reviews note occasional sync delays or visibility issues when updates are pending.
Many reviewers value Cloudbeds’ reporting because it helps them track occupancy, revenue, KPIs, and performance across channels. However, users consis... Many reviewers value Cloudbeds’ reporting because it helps them track occupancy, revenue, KPIs, and performance across channels. However, users consistently ask for more customizable, interactive, and faster reports, especially for revenue management, financial analysis, and property-specific views. Several mention that the current reports are useful but can feel hard to search, slow to download, or too spreadsheet-like.
Where hoteliers push back
Support is a major concern in the reviews: some users praise fast chat help, onboarding, and knowledge resources, while others strongly criticize dela... Support is a major concern in the reviews: some users praise fast chat help, onboarding, and knowledge resources, while others strongly criticize delayed email responses and chatbot-first workflows. The most common complaint is the lack of immediate phone support for urgent operational issues, which hotels feel directly affects guest service and revenue when systems break. A smaller group appreciates responsive, knowledgeable agents and solid implementation help.
Cloudbeds is valued for integrated payments, deposit collection, and the ability to handle charges directly in the workflow. This helps hotels secure... Cloudbeds is valued for integrated payments, deposit collection, and the ability to handle charges directly in the workflow. This helps hotels secure bookings, speed up check-in, and keep payment data connected to reservations. But several reviewers want stronger local billing/tax support, better invoice handling, more payment processor options, and smoother payment setup.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
Several reviews mention strong support, with named team members providing prompt help and practical solutions. This is seen as important for minimizin... Several reviews mention strong support, with named team members providing prompt help and practical solutions. This is seen as important for minimizing downtime and keeping hotel distribution workflows running smoothly.
Reviewers frequently say SiteMinder keeps availability and bookings synced across multiple online channels, which reduces manual updates and helps pre... Reviewers frequently say SiteMinder keeps availability and bookings synced across multiple online channels, which reduces manual updates and helps prevent distribution errors. They see this as core to improving occupancy and streamlining day-to-day hotel operations.
Users note that SiteMinder integrates well with Opera, making it easier to connect the channel manager to core hotel systems. This integration is valu... Users note that SiteMinder integrates well with Opera, making it easier to connect the channel manager to core hotel systems. This integration is valued because it supports smoother operations and reduces the need for manual coordination between systems.
Where hoteliers push back
Reviewers want more advanced reporting and analytics to better understand performance across channels. This suggests SiteMinder is helpful for distrib... Reviewers want more advanced reporting and analytics to better understand performance across channels. This suggests SiteMinder is helpful for distribution execution, but hotels may need deeper insights to optimize revenue and decide which channels deliver the best return.
One reviewer says the system feels outdated, suggesting the product may lag behind newer expectations in hotel tech. This concern matters because an o... One reviewer says the system feels outdated, suggesting the product may lag behind newer expectations in hotel tech. This concern matters because an outdated platform can limit agility and slow down how quickly hotels can adapt their distribution strategy.
Ranks higher for
It depends on your requirements. Cloudbeds Channel Manager and RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. Cloudbeds Channel Manager offers 208 verified integration partners, while RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax) offers 72. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Cloudbeds Channel Manager leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Cloudbeds Channel Manager: No. RateTiger Channel Manager (by eRevMax): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Cloudbeds has an HT Score of 98 and eRevMax has 60. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property