The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 256 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
eviivo shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for Vacation Rentals & Villas properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Booking Performance and Pace Reporting.
feratel media technologies AG shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 256 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 256 | 0 |
After analyzing 256 verified reviews, eviivo users most value its support and on-boarding experience, ease of use and intuitive interface, comprehensive feature set, while feratel media technologies AG users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support and on-boarding experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of use and intuitive interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Comprehensive feature set
▾
|
|
|
+
Time-saving benefits
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Mobile functionality
▾
|
|
|
−
Technical and display issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and subscription
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Channel Managers vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 66 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #14 21 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #13 5 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #14 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #9 38 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #8 42 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #9 24 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 25 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 21 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 194 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #25 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #20 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between eviivo Suite™ CM and feratel Deskline 3.0 hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational scope. Both products aim to streamline your distribution channels, but eviivo’s extensive review base and feature set position it as the more proven choice for most hotels. While feratel offers a solid platform especially suited for tourism organizations, its lack of recent reviews and broader hotel industry adoption makes it less compelling for hoteliers seeking a reliable channel manager today. Are you ready to make the right choice for your property?
eviivo Suite™ and feratel Deskline 3.0 both address the core problem of channel management and distribution but diverge significantly in their market approach. eviivo is optimized for small to mid-sized hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals, emphasizing ease of use, a wide array of features, and extensive integrations validated by over 230 reviews and recent feedback from numerous hoteliers. Conversely, feratel primarily serves tourism organizations and larger hospitality networks in Europe, with no recent hotel reviews to substantiate its effectiveness or user satisfaction. Given this contrast, which platform aligns better with your hotel’s size and operational complexity?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, full-featured channel management platform with proven user satisfaction and a broad integration network, go with eviivo. Its review score of 85.37, 231 reviews, and recent positive feedback affirm its reliability for independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals. If your team is part of a regional tourism board or larger hospitality consortium seeking a system integrated with destination management, feratel’s offering might appeal, but its lack of recent hotel user feedback suggests less current reliability.
eviivo scores 4.65 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its user-friendly interface and straightforward onboarding, making it accessible for teams of all technical backgrounds. Support and onboarding are also highly rated at 4.78, with users highlighting quick, helpful assistance that simplifies daily operations. In contrast, feratel’s platform lacks recent reviews or user feedback, leaving its ease of use unverified. Based on available data, edge: eviivo.
eviivo offers 15 distinct features, including yield rules, derived rates, inventory management, and an analytics dashboard—capabilities that facilitate dynamic pricing and performance tracking. feratel’s system primarily functions as a channel and booking platform without the same depth of features or analytics. Given its more extensive feature set, eviivo provides a more comprehensive tool for independent hoteliers looking to optimize revenue and manage multiple channels efficiently. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s support and onboarding ratings are 4.78 out of 5, with reviews mentioning quick response times and helpful, friendly agents that ease the transition into their platform. Many users describe their support experience as essential to their operational success. feratel has no recent reviews or testimonial data, making it impossible to gauge support quality. Based on current evidence, edge: eviivo.
eviivo connects to 32 verified partners, including major OTAs and industry tools like TripAdvisor, RateLabs, and RoomPriceGenie, offering extensive flexibility. feratel integrates with 13 partners, including Booking.com and regional portals, but has fewer options and less recent integration updates. If broad, proven connectivity is vital, eviivo’s larger network provides a clear advantage. Edge: eviivo.
eviivo’s review score of 85.37 reflects widespread satisfaction among small to medium-sized hotels, vacation rentals, and B&Bs. Recent reviews highlight its ease of use, time savings, and support quality. feratel has no recent hotel reviews or ratings, making it impossible to measure user satisfaction. Given the wealth of recent feedback, edge: eviivo.
eviivo prices at $700 per month, with no free tier or trial, reflecting its comprehensive feature set and support. feratel charges a base price of $100, but without detailed information on additional fees or implementation costs, making direct comparison difficult. For most hotels, eviivo’s higher price is justified by its features, support, and proven track record.
Not ideal if your hotel primarily relies on regional tourism boards with a focus on destination marketing, where feratel’s system might be more aligned.
Not ideal if your hotel is an independent property seeking a user-friendly, feature-rich channel manager backed by recent user reviews.
The core difference lies in their target audiences: eviivo is a mature, widely adopted channel manager for independent hotels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals, while feratel caters more to regional tourism organizations and larger networks. eviivo’s extensive review base and current user satisfaction suggest it is the more reliable choice for hoteliers seeking a straightforward, feature-packed platform.
Choose eviivo if you want a proven, well-supported system that simplifies distribution, maximizes revenue, and offers extensive integrations. Its features, ease of use, and recent positive feedback make it the clear leader for most hotel operators today.
Opt for feratel if your operation is part of a broader regional tourism strategy or requires specialized destination management tools, but be aware of the lack of recent hotel-specific reviews and limited independent hotel adoption. For most hotels, eviivo provides a more certain path to streamlining distribution and growing revenue.
Channel Managers pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $700/mo | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, eviivo Suite™ CM and feratel Deskline 3.0 share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Booking Performance and Pace Reporting | ||
| Derived Rates | ||
| Inventory Management | ||
| Yield Rules |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Because of the automation from the eviivo Suite, it saves me a huge amount of time. This time I can use on growing the business; working on the business instead of in the business...."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Auf eviivo könnte ich heut gar nicht mehr drauf verzichten. Das Hotel ohne dieses Programm zu führen, scheint mir fast unmöglich, weil die Zeit, die ich jetzt erspart habe, die ich..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Aujourd’hui on a la possibilité de gérer l’ensemble de notre parc, que ce soit la tarification, le calendrier, la communication en un seul clic pour gérer plus de 50 appartements,..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews highlight the excellent support and onboarding experience provided by Eviivo, especially the role played by agents in easing the transiti... Many reviews highlight the excellent support and onboarding experience provided by Eviivo, especially the role played by agents in easing the transition and setup process. The support team is noted for its quick, clear assistance, essential for smooth operations.
Users repeatedly praised Eviivo for its intuitive platform that simplifies booking and channel management, making it ideal even for non-tech-savvy use... Users repeatedly praised Eviivo for its intuitive platform that simplifies booking and channel management, making it ideal even for non-tech-savvy users. The ease of navigation across reservations, channels, and settings has significantly reduced administrative tasks.
The diverse capabilities of Eviivo, such as multi-property management and centralized control over operations, are highly valued. Users mention that t... The diverse capabilities of Eviivo, such as multi-property management and centralized control over operations, are highly valued. Users mention that these features save time and optimize daily management, although some call for more customization options.
Where hoteliers push back
While the platform is praised for desktop use, several reviews criticize the mobile site's cumbersome nature and the app's lack of intuitiveness, lead... While the platform is praised for desktop use, several reviews criticize the mobile site's cumbersome nature and the app's lack of intuitiveness, leading to challenges in managing bookings on the go.
Some users experienced initial technical issues, such as display bugs, but noted these were resolved quickly with support. Users feel ongoing technica... Some users experienced initial technical issues, such as display bugs, but noted these were resolved quickly with support. Users feel ongoing technical improvements could benefit the overall platform.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. eviivo Suite™ CM and feratel Deskline 3.0 share many core Channel Managers features, but each has unique capabilities. eviivo Suite™ CM offers 32 verified integration partners, while feratel Deskline 3.0 offers 13. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. eviivo Suite™ CM leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
eviivo Suite™ CM: No. feratel Deskline 3.0: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Channel Managers vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. eviivo has an HT Score of 85 and feratel media technologies AG has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor