eviivo Suite™ HMS vs. Zonal PMS:
Which Is Right for You?

The Decision

Choosing between eviivo Suite™ HMS and Zonal PMS hinges on how your hotel operates and your specific needs. Both aim to streamline operations and improve revenue, but they approach these goals differently. eviivo is geared toward independent and smaller properties with a broad feature set and a strong UK presence, while Zonal offers a robust cloud-based platform with extensive OTA integrations and operational tools. Which system aligns best with your hotel’s size, location, and operational focus?

Is eviivo Suite™ or Zonal PMS Better for Hotels?

Both products solve core management challenges like reservations, guest communication, and reporting. eviivo excels in serving small to medium-sized independent properties, especially in the UK, with a broad array of features including multi-currency support, native email marketing, and property management modules. Conversely, Zonal focuses on large independents and multi-site groups, emphasizing real-time OTA integration, guest experience enhancements like mobile check-in, and operational automation.

eviivo’s strength lies in its comprehensive feature set, with 54 unique capabilities, including revenue management and guest CRM, making it suitable for hoteliers seeking an all-in-one tool. Zonal’s core advantage is its real-time OTA management, seamless F&B integration, and guest services, although it offers fewer features overall. The key question is whether your hotel needs a wide feature set or a highly integrated operational platform.

eviivo Suite™ vs Zonal PMS: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

Your choice depends on your hotel’s profile. If your property is an independent inn, B&B, or vacation rental in the UK or Europe, eviivo’s 191 reviews and recent feedback give it a clear edge, especially with a 95% likelihood to recommend. Its affordability, ease of use, and extensive integrations make it ideal for small to medium properties focused on direct bookings and digital automation.

If you operate a boutique hotel or multi-site operation, especially in the UK, Zonal’s singular focus and integration with over 450 OTAs make it more attractive. With only one review but a 100% likelihood to recommend, Zonal is better suited for hotels that prioritize real-time channel management, F&B integration, and mobile check-in features.

Is eviivo Suite™ or Zonal PMS Easier to Use?

eviivo’s ease of use is reflected in its 4.48/5 rating, praised for its intuitive interface, well-designed booking and billing processes, and straightforward report generation. Users note that onboarding is smooth, with thorough training, although some find the interface design could improve. Support staff are generally helpful, but chat support has faced criticism for communication issues.

Zonal earns a perfect 5/5 in ease of use, with a reputation for a user-friendly interface, quick onboarding, and dedicated UK support. Its cloud design simplifies operations for staff, often leading to faster staff adaptation and smoother workflows.

Edge: Zonal.

Which Has Better Features: eviivo or Zonal?

eviivo’s 54 features include multi-currency management, native email marketing, booking engine, channel management, property management, guest CRM, house-keeping, revenue modules, and automated night audits. It supports advanced functions like dynamic pricing, online check-in/out, and tablet check-in, offering a full-suite management experience.

Zonal, with fewer features, emphasizes real-time OTA synchronization, mobile check-in/out, digital keys, and F&B integrations. While it excels in guest experience tools and operational automation, it lacks the extensive property management and revenue features of eviivo.

Edge: eviivo.

Which Has Better Customer Support: eviivo or Zonal?

eviivo’s customer support is highly rated at 4.57/5, with reviewers describing staff as professional, responsive, and helpful. Notably, users highlight quick resolution times and thorough onboarding, although some mention inconsistent chat support and room for improvement in communication.

Zonal also scores a perfect 5/5, with praise for its rapid responses, knowledgeable staff, and smooth onboarding process. Support is described as friendly and attentive, especially in the UK, often cited as a key reason for customer satisfaction.

Edge: Zonal.

Which Has More Integrations: eviivo or Zonal?

eviivo offers integration with 32 verified partners, including major OTAs like Expedia, Booking.com, and additional tools like Hotelchamp and D-Edge, providing broad connectivity. These integrations support multi-channel distribution and revenue management.

Zonal has only 2 verified partners, SiteMinder and Hijiffy, limiting its third-party connectivity. However, these integrations are robust within the Zonal ecosystem, especially useful for F&B and internal operations.

Edge: eviivo.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: eviivo or Zonal?

eviivo’s recent reviews and 191 total reviews underpin its strong reputation in the independent hotel sector, especially in the UK. Its overall rating of 1/5 in public scoring is misleading; the detailed reviews highlight high satisfaction, with a 95% likelihood of recommending and an emphasis on ease of use and support.

Zonal’s single review and rating don’t provide enough data to assess hotel satisfaction conclusively. Its users, primarily boutique hotels, report excellent onboarding and operational improvements, but the lack of extensive reviews makes it harder to gauge comparative satisfaction.

Edge: eviivo.

How Much Do eviivo and Zonal Cost?

eviivo’s base price is $700/month, with no trial or freemium options, reflecting its extensive feature set and target market. Pricing is straightforward but aligned with small to medium properties wanting comprehensive management tools.

Zonal costs $600/month, also without a free trial, offering a slightly lower entry point. Its pricing structure is comparable, but detailed quotes may vary depending on the property’s size and needs.

What Type of Hotel Should Use eviivo?

• Hotels that operate independently, especially in the UK or Europe.
• Properties with a focus on direct bookings, digital marketing, and multi-channel distribution.
• Small to medium-sized inns, B&Bs, vacation rentals, and boutique hotels.
• Teams seeking a full property management solution with advanced revenue and guest management.

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel requires extensive F&B or event management beyond accommodation.
• You operate a large multi-site chain needing enterprise-level integrations.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Zonal?

• Hotels, pubs, and properties with multiple locations seeking real-time OTA management.
• Hotels prioritizing guest experience enhancements like mobile check-in & digital keys.
• Properties that want integrated F&B, event, and billing management.
• Hotels already invested in the Zonal ecosystem or with a focus on operational automation.

Not ideal if:

• Your property is a small independent with minimal OTA distribution.
• You seek a broad property management system with extensive revenue modules.

eviivo Suite™ vs Zonal PMS: The Bottom Line for Hotels

eviivo excels in delivering a feature-rich, easy-to-use platform that supports independent properties across multiple countries. Its extensive integrations and proven track record in the UK make it a strong choice for hotels seeking comprehensive management and marketing capabilities.

Zonal offers a streamlined, user-friendly cloud PMS with excellent guest experience tools and real-time OTA management. Its strengths lie in mobile guest services and operational automation, particularly for multi-site or F&B-heavy properties.

If your hotel needs a broad management system with extensive features, eviivo is the clear winner. If your focus is on guest convenience, OTA connectivity, and operational automation, Zonal is the better fit.

Final verdict: For most independent hotels in the UK and Europe, eviivo’s richer feature set and recent reviews make it the preferred choice. For boutique hotels prioritizing guest experience and operational efficiency, Zonal’s ease of use and support are compelling.