The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
EyeQ shines .
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 43 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, EyeQ users most value its , while MyStay users highlight contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| EyeQ |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | EyeQ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 15 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 10 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #8 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | EyeQ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #4 11 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #5 12 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #6 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | EyeQ |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | — | #7 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #4 32 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #6 2 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #4 2 reviews |
Choosing between FaceID Smart Kiosk by EyeQ and MyStay Check-in hinges on your hotel's specific needs for contactless guest management. FaceID specializes in facial recognition security, aiming to streamline visitor check-ins and enhance security protocols, while MyStay offers a broad suite of contactless check-in, check-out, and guest communication features. Both solutions target contactless experiences, but they diverge in scope and functionality—so which one better fits your hotel?
With more recent reviews and a higher review count, MyStay clearly leads in user satisfaction and ongoing development. Its extensive feature set and proven hotel industry presence make it the stronger choice for most hoteliers. Are you ready to see which platform aligns best with your operational goals?
Both FaceID and MyStay aim to reduce contact and improve operational efficiency, but their core functions differ. FaceID focuses exclusively on facial recognition technology designed for secure and rapid visitor authentication, making it ideal for environments prioritizing security and touchless entry. Conversely, MyStay offers a wide array of contactless check-in and check-out tools, automated communication, and guest service functionalities, making it suitable for hotels seeking a comprehensive guest experience platform.
While FaceID boasts AI-driven facial recognition that can speed up arrivals and bolster security, it lacks the broad guest engagement features that make MyStay appealing for properties wanting to automate pre-arrival and post-stay interactions. Do you need merely enhanced security or a full guest journey solution?
If your hotel needs an all-in-one contactless guest management system with features like online check-in, digital payments, and automated guest communication, go with MyStay. Its suite of 14 unique features—including PMS integration, guest segmentation, and digital checkout—makes it ideal for hotels aiming to upgrade their guest service and boost ancillary revenue.
If security and rapid visitor recognition are your primary concerns, and your hotel operates in environments like corporate offices or healthcare where facial recognition enhances safety, FaceID is a fit. However, because FaceID lacks the extensive guest communication tools and integrations found in MyStay, it’s best suited for specialized security applications rather than full-scale hotel operations.
MyStay’s user interface consistently receives high ratings—4.91 out of 5 for ease of use—and reviews describe its setup as straightforward, with many users praising its intuitive design. Support and onboarding are also rated nearly perfect at 4.93 out of 5, with hoteliers noting that the platform is simple to implement and quickly adopted by staff.
FaceID, on the other hand, lacks detailed usability reviews, but as an AI-based facial recognition system, it generally requires hardware setup and integration, which can be complex. Given the absence of recent user feedback, the edge goes to MyStay, which has proven usability and support.
MyStay integrates 14 features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel communication, digital payments, door lock, and self-service kiosks—covering a broad guest journey. FaceID offers a specialized facial recognition module, focusing solely on AI-powered security and visitor identification, with no additional guest management capabilities.
Considering the variety and depth of features, MyStay clearly provides a more comprehensive solution for hotels wanting to streamline operations, increase revenue, and improve guest engagement. Its feature count and versatility give it the edge in solving multiple hotel challenges simultaneously.
Both platforms lack detailed recent review data for support, but MyStay’s reviews highlight a 4.93/5 support rating, with users praising its responsiveness and ongoing updates. Hoteliers appreciate the quick technical assistance and continuous feature improvements, fostering confidence in the platform’s reliability.
FaceID’s support details are unavailable, making it harder to assess. Given the established positive feedback for MyStay’s support team, the edge goes to MyStay as the more dependable choice for hotel support needs.
MyStay connects with 30 verified partners, including property management systems, channel managers, and other hotel tech solutions. Its integrations encompass popular platforms like Priority Software, Kwentra, RoomRaccoon, and WuBook, simplifying setup and data flow across hotel operations.
FaceID offers no verified integrations, limiting its use to environments where facial recognition alone suffices. For hotels seeking a cohesive tech ecosystem, MyStay’s extensive integration options clearly make it the better choice.
With 40 recent reviews, all for MyStay, hoteliers rate it at 5/5 for overall satisfaction, ease of use, and support. Properties across segments—from boutique to serviced apartments—value its reliability and breadth of features, with many reviewers emphasizing improved operational efficiency and guest experience.
FaceID has no recent reviews, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction. Given the current data, MyStay’s high ratings and recent feedback firmly establish it as the preferred platform.
FaceID’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting it may involve custom quotes or enterprise-level agreements, typical for security-focused solutions. MyStay’s pricing starts at $400 per month, with no trial or implementation fees, offering transparent costs for a comprehensive platform.
If budget transparency is crucial, MyStay’s straightforward pricing provides a clear baseline for evaluating value.
Not ideal if your hotel needs comprehensive guest communication, online check-in, or revenue-generating features. FaceID is best for security-centric applications rather than full-scale hospitality operations.
Not ideal if your hotel operates in a niche environment requiring specialized security solutions or if you prefer solutions with limited integrations. MyStay is suited for hotels aiming to modernize their guest journey comprehensively.
The core difference is that FaceID offers specialized facial recognition security, while MyStay provides an all-encompassing contactless guest management solution. If your hotel’s priority is security and rapid visitor identification, FaceID can serve that purpose well, especially in environments where safety outweighs guest engagement.
However, for hotels seeking a broad, well-supported platform that automates check-in, checkout, communication, and revenue opportunities, MyStay is the clear winner. Its extensive features, high user ratings, and strong industry presence make it the more adaptable and reliable choice for most properties.
Choose FaceID if security and facial recognition are your main goals. Opt for MyStay if streamlining your guest journey, boosting revenue, and operational efficiency are your priorities.
Note: The above analysis is based on current review data and feature descriptions. As with any tech investment, consider testing or requesting demos to ensure the solution aligns with your hotel’s specific needs.
According to HTR's product database, FaceID Smart Kiosk and MyStay Check in share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | EyeQ |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FaceID Smart Kiosk and MyStay Check in share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. FaceID Smart Kiosk offers 0 verified integration partners, while MyStay Check in offers 30. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FaceID Smart Kiosk: No. MyStay Check in: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. EyeQ has an HT Score of 0 and MyStay has 22. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor