The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 42 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Akia shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Guest History.
Arribatec shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 42 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 42 | 0 |
After analyzing 42 verified reviews, Akia users most value its guest messaging, team communication and task management, contactless check-in, while Arribatec users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest messaging
▾
|
|
|
+
Team communication and task management
▾
|
|
|
+
Contactless check-in
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer feedback and reputation management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Automated responses
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and data synchronization
▾
|
|
|
−
Guidebooks and digital tools
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 17 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #4 18 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #19 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #16 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 17 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #6 7 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #4 10 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #7 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 41 reviews | — |
Choosing between Akia Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs and guest experience goals. Akia specializes in streamlining communication and contactless check-in through a feature-rich platform, whereas Fàcil offers a broad suite of digital check-in options with an emphasis on innovation and guest engagement. Which aligns better with your current priorities: seamless communication or advanced check-in technology?
Both products aim to modernize your check-in process, but Akia’s more extensive review base and recent positive feedback suggest it is currently the more reliable choice. Are you ready to dive into which solution best suits your hotel?
Akia and Fàcil both address the need for contactless check-in, but Akia’s platform is more mature, with a recent review count of 38 and a 4.95/5 overall rating. Its reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and guest communication features, making check-in faster and more efficient.
Fàcil, on the other hand, is newer and lacks recent user feedback or reviews, which makes it difficult to assess its real-world performance. While Fàcil offers innovative options like holographic check-in and mobile keys, the absence of review-backed data makes Akia the safer choice for now.
Edge: Akia.
If your hotel needs a proven, well-reviewed contactless check-in solution that improves guest communication and reduces labor, go with Akia. It’s ideal for hotels that value integrated messaging, automated responses, and detailed guest history, particularly in boutique, independent, or branded properties.
Choose Fàcil if your hotel seeks cutting-edge check-in options like holographic or mobile key technology, and you’re willing to experiment with newer, less-reviewed solutions. It’s better suited for tech-forward properties or hotels with large staff dedicated to guest engagement.
For most hotels prioritizing reliability and recent user satisfaction, Akia is the smarter pick.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s platform is rated 4.82/5 for ease of use, with users praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and efficient guest communication features. Reviewers mention that Akia’s mobile friendly design and comprehensive onboarding process make staff adoption straightforward, with minimal disruptions.
Fàcil’s user experience is unreviewed, and given its broader, more complex features like holographic check-in, it may require more staff training and adjustment. Without recent user feedback, Akia’s ease of use remains the clearer advantage.
Edge: Akia.
Akia boasts over 30 unique features, including SMS messaging, photo sharing, chatbot booking, automated replies, guest history, ID verification, and integrations with door lock systems. Its suite caters to both guest engagement and operational automation, with features designed to enhance safety and efficiency.
Fàcil’s features include self-service kiosks, web-apps, holographic check-in, and mobile keys, emphasizing innovative check-in options but lacking the breadth of communication and automation tools Akia offers. Since Akia’s feature set is more extensive and proven, it has the edge.
Edge: Akia.
Akia scores a 4.86/5 for customer support, with reviewers describing their support as knowledgeable, responsive, and easy to reach. Recent reviews affirm that Akia’s support team is committed to quick issue resolution and smooth onboarding, which is critical during implementation.
Fàcil’s support data is unavailable, but its larger Norwegian team and broader customer base suggest more established support resources. However, without review-backed evidence, Akia’s support performance remains the more verified.
Edge: Akia.
Akia integrates with 32 verified partners, including leading PMS providers like Oracle Hospitality, WebRezPro, and Stayntouch, along with keyless entry solutions like FLEXIPASS and RoomRaccoon. Its extensive integration network ensures smooth data flow and operational consistency.
Fàcil has only 5 verified partners, primarily focused on core hotel management and check-in solutions like Vingcard, Hoist Group, and Arribatec itself. Akia’s broader integration ecosystem provides more flexibility and options for your hotel.
Edge: Akia.
Akia’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.95/5 rating from 38 reviews, and a 97% likelihood to recommend. Hotels in various segments, especially boutique and independent hotels, praise its ease of use, automation, and improved guest reviews.
Fàcil lacks reviews altogether, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. Given the strong, recent feedback for Akia, it clearly holds the higher rating.
Edge: Akia.
Pricing for both Akia and Fàcil is not publicly disclosed, indicating custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. Since no trial or freemium options are available, your team will need to contact vendors for specific costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing, evaluate potential ROI based on features, support, and reviews before proceeding.
Not ideal if your hotel relies heavily on hardware-specific check-in methods like holographic systems without existing integration plans.
Not ideal if your hotel prefers a well-reviewed, proven platform with extensive support and integrations already in place.
Akia offers a mature, review-backed platform with extensive features, integrations, and support, making it suitable for most hotels seeking reliable contactless check-in. Its recent 38 reviews and 4.95/5 rating demonstrate strong user satisfaction and ongoing product development.
Fàcil presents exciting, innovative features like holographic check-in and mobile keys, but the lack of reviews and data makes it a riskier choice unless your hotel is tech-savvy and eager to experiment. For now, Akia’s proven track record makes it the more advisable option.
If your hotel values dependable, comprehensive guest communication and automation, go with Akia. Choose Fàcil if innovation and future tech are your top priorities and you’re prepared to manage potential uncertainties.
According to HTR's product database, Akia Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec share 5 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Desktop App (non-web based) | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| Photo Sharing | ||
| Whatsapp Integration |
Showing top differences. 18 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Automation emphasizes the guests experience at their fingertips. Akia closes the gap of missed opportunities by acting as a liaison to our guest satisfaction efforts. We have been..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The messaging system is prized for facilitating real-time communication with guests, enhancing service quality. It helps staff manage guest requests a... The messaging system is prized for facilitating real-time communication with guests, enhancing service quality. It helps staff manage guest requests and issues promptly, which positively impacts guest satisfaction and operational efficiency.
Internal team communication and task management features are highlighted as significant benefits. These tools help hotel staff coordinate efficiently,... Internal team communication and task management features are highlighted as significant benefits. These tools help hotel staff coordinate efficiently, track tasks, and manage guest needs more effectively. Users believe improvements could be made in the clarity and usability of these systems.
Reviewers consistently appreciate Akia's contactless check-in feature, stating it makes the check-in process seamless and efficient. This feature redu... Reviewers consistently appreciate Akia's contactless check-in feature, stating it makes the check-in process seamless and efficient. This feature reduces physical interactions, streamlines the guest arrival experience, and ensures compliance with health guidelines, especially valued during the pandemic.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users highlight the benefit of Akia's automated responses which save time and effort. However, several reviews mention that these automated respo... Many users highlight the benefit of Akia's automated responses which save time and effort. However, several reviews mention that these automated responses can sometimes be inaccurate or mistimed, causing confusion for guests and requiring manual intervention from staff.
Users appreciate Akia's integration capabilities with PMS and other systems but desire improvements such as seamless credit card transaction integrati... Users appreciate Akia's integration capabilities with PMS and other systems but desire improvements such as seamless credit card transaction integration and better synchronization features to eliminate duplicated efforts and manual data entry.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Akia Contactless Check-In and Fàcil by Arribatec share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. Akia Contactless Check-In offers 32 verified integration partners, while Fàcil by Arribatec offers 5. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Akia Contactless Check-In leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Akia Contactless Check-In: No. Fàcil by Arribatec: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Akia has an HT Score of 63 and Arribatec has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor