The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Fortis shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Fortis users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between Fortis by Fortis and Zil Money hinges on your hotel’s specific needs for payment processing. Fortis aims to provide a comprehensive, industry-specific solution, while Zil Money offers a broad array of financial management features. Both claim to streamline payments; however, their approaches and market presence differ sharply. Which aligns best with your hotel’s operational goals?
Fortis is a niche platform designed explicitly for hospitality, whereas Zil Money caters to various industries with a focus on financial operations. Do you prioritize industry-specific integration or a versatile financial toolkit? Let’s explore.
Fortis positions itself as an all-in-one hospitality payment solution, with claims of seamless integration into property management systems and tailored industry features. In contrast, Zil Money is a general-purpose financial platform with extensive features like invoicing, expense tracking, and multiple payment methods. While Fortis’s market presence appears limited—no recent reviews and a single verified partner—Zil Money boasts 54 reviews, all recent, with an 87% likelihood to recommend.
Both platforms aim to simplify payments, but Fortis’s lack of recent user feedback and limited integrations suggest it’s less proven in hotel environments. Zil Money, with its broader feature set and active reviews, clearly has a stronger foothold. Are you comfortable adopting a less-reviewed, niche product, or do you prefer an established platform with a proven track record?
If your hotel needs a payment platform tailored to hospitality, especially with property management integration, Fortis could be suitable. However, given its zero reviews in the past six months and no reported integrations beyond Yanolja, its practical adoption remains uncertain.
Conversely, Zil Money is better suited for hotels seeking a comprehensive financial management platform that handles invoicing, expense management, and multiple payment methods, including ACH, wire, and virtual cards. Its 54 reviews, recent feedback, and high recommendation rate make it a safer choice for hotels prioritizing reliable payment processing and financial operations.
In summary, choose Fortis if your focus is industry-specific payment solutions that integrate with hospitality systems, despite limited recent validation. Opt for Zil Money if you value a proven, feature-rich platform with active user feedback and multi-industry flexibility.
User ratings reveal a stark difference: Fortis scores 0/5 across ease of use, onboarding, and support, with no recent reviews to verify its usability. Its lack of user feedback suggests it’s either untested or not user-friendly.
Zil Money, with a 4.5/5 ease of use rating and an onboarding score of 4.16/5, indicates a user-friendly interface and smoother onboarding process. Recent reviews praise its simplicity and straightforward workflows, reducing setup time and encouraging staff adoption.
Edge: Zil Money.
Fortis offers no features beyond its core payment processing capabilities, making it a minimal solution suitable for basic needs. Meanwhile, Zil Money provides 15 distinct features, including pay-by-link, recurring payments, multi-currency settlements, contactless payments, and payment splitting.
The breadth of features in Zil Money caters to diverse financial scenarios, enabling operations beyond simple transactions. Fortis, lacking additional features, likely can’t support complex payment workflows.
Edge: Zil Money.
Fortis’s customer support is rated 0/5, with no recent reviews or user feedback available to gauge responsiveness or quality. This absence raises concerns about support reliability.
Zil Money scores a solid 4.5/5 in customer support, with reviews highlighting prompt responses and helpful assistance. Reviewers appreciate the platform’s ongoing support, even noting areas for improvement like faster response times, but overall, the rating indicates a strong support system.
Edge: Zil Money.
Fortis has only one verified integration—Yanolja Cloud—limiting its connectivity options and flexibility for hotel operations.
Zil Money, on the other hand, offers no official third-party integrations in the data provided, but its API capabilities and broad feature set suggest potential for future integrations. However, it currently lacks the verified partnerships that could streamline your property’s financial ecosystem.
Edge: Fortis—due to its single verified integration, but the overall ecosystem remains limited.
Fortis’s ratings are nonexistent, with no recent reviews or scores, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. This lack indicates limited adoption or feedback.
Zil Money’s recent reviews consistently rate the platform highly, with an 87% likelihood of recommendation. Hotels across various segments, especially those valuing ease of use and support, express satisfaction with the platform’s reliability.
Edge: Zil Money.
Fortis does not disclose pricing details, suggesting it may have custom quotes or be less transparent about costs.
Zil Money charges a base price of $400, with no mention of monthly fees or hidden costs, and offers a 15-day free trial. Its straightforward pricing model may appeal to hotels seeking predictable expenses.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Fortis targets the hospitality industry with a payment-only focus, but its lack of recent user feedback and integrations limits confidence. Zil Money, with extensive features, proven support, and active reviews, offers a more reliable option for most hotels.
If your hotel requires a multifunctional financial platform with proven usability and support, Zil Money is the clear choice. For niche, property-system-integrated payment solutions, Fortis might suffice—though its limited validation makes it a riskier pick.
In conclusion, Zil Money’s robust feature set, high customer ratings, and active review base make it the recommended solution for hotels seeking reliable, flexible payment and financial management. Fortis remains a potential option for niche users but lacks the validation necessary for confident decision-making.
According to HTR's product database, fortis and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. fortis and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. fortis offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
fortis: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Fortis has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor