The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 194 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Crave Interactive shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payments and Guest Messaging.
FreshBed shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 194 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 194 | 0 |
After analyzing 194 verified reviews, Crave Interactive users most value its ease of use and guest experience, support and maintenance, efficiency in information management, while FreshBed users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use and Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Maintenance
▾
|
|
|
+
Efficiency in Information Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Branding
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Tablet Functionality and Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration and Omnichannel Marketing
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #4 30 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #2 62 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #1 75 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #1 16 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #2 85 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #2 156 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 49 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #4 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #2 92 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #3 51 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #2 6 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #2 8 reviews | — |
Choosing between Crave Interactive and FreshBed for in-room hotel tablets hinges on your hotel's specific needs and priorities. Crave's solution is designed to boost guest engagement through a feature-rich platform, while FreshBed appears to be primarily a property management system without dedicated in-room tablet features. Given the review data, Crave offers a mature, well-rated product with detailed features and a broad regional presence, making it the more compelling choice for hoteliers seeking a dedicated in-room tablet solution.
Crave Interactive is the clear leader, boasting over 147 recent reviews, a high score of 4.6/5, and strong ratings across support, ease of use, and value. FreshBed, with no reviews or ratings, provides little evidence of performance or features, making it a less suitable option for hoteliers looking for proven technology. For hotels serious about enhancing guest experience with reliable, feature-rich in-room tablets, Crave is the recommended pick.
Both products aim to improve guest engagement and operational efficiency, but Crave's established platform offers a comprehensive suite of features based on extensive reviews. It is specifically built for in-room guest services, including hotel directories, multi-lingual support, digital menus, and contactless ordering, which FreshBed does not explicitly provide. FreshBed’s core focus is property management, and it lacks dedicated in-room tablet capabilities.
Crave’s platform is highly customizable, allowing hotels to tailor interfaces, support multi-language content, and integrate with multiple partner systems. Conversely, FreshBed's offerings seem limited to management functions, with no publicly available information about dedicated guest-facing features. Do you need a proven, feature-rich in-room tablet solution or a management system without specific tablet functionalities?
If your hotel needs a dedicated in-room guest engagement platform that enhances guest satisfaction, then Crave is the better choice. It has a proven track record, with a 4.6/5 overall rating based on 147 reviews, including recent feedback emphasizing usability, support, and feature depth.
However, if your primary goal is a property management system (PMS) with some potential future integrations, and you are less concerned about guest-facing tablets, then FreshBed might be relevant. But note, FreshBed has no reviews or ratings available, making its reliability and feature set uncertain. For hoteliers seeking tested, guest-centric technology, Crave’s track record makes it the more reliable investment.
Crave scores 4.5/5 on ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive interface and straightforward onboarding process. Users find navigating and managing content on Crave’s tablets simple, with high praise for its responsiveness and user-friendly design, often citing a positive guest experience.
FreshBed provides no publicly available ease-of-use ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its interface or onboarding process. Since usability is critical for staff adoption and guest satisfaction, the lack of data on FreshBed's interface indicates uncertainty.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave offers 55 unique features tailored specifically for in-room guest engagement, including hotel directories, multi-lingual support, digital menus, contactless ordering, guest messaging, mobile checkout, and integrations with POS systems. These features are designed to create a seamless digital guest experience and generate additional revenue through upselling and in-room services.
FreshBed, on the other hand, provides no listed features for the guest-facing tablet experience. It appears to be primarily a property management system with no explicit mention of dedicated in-room guest functionalities.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s customer support is rated 4.6/5, with reviews highlighting prompt, attentive service and consistent assistance during setup and ongoing operations. Guests and hotel staff alike comment on Crave’s responsiveness, which mitigates potential issues and enhances the implementation experience.
FreshBed offers no reviews or ratings related to support or onboarding, leaving hotel operators uncertain about its service quality. Given the importance of reliable support for technology adoption, this lack of data favors Crave in this aspect.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave integrates with 17 verified partners, including Interel, Quore, Oracle Hospitality, Kipsu, Infor, and Amadeus, providing a broad ecosystem for hotel systems and services. These integrations facilitate seamless workflows, centralize guest data, and enable enhanced marketing and operational automation.
FreshBed has no verified integrations listed, which could limit its ability to connect with other hotel systems or support advanced digital marketing strategies. For hotels seeking a platform that plays well with existing systems, Crave’s extensive partner network is a distinct advantage.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s reviews are consistently high, with a 4.6/5 overall rating based on 147 reviews, the majority of which are recent (only one review in the past six months). Hoteliers praise its ease of use, support, and feature set across various hotel segments, including luxury, boutique, and resort properties.
FreshBed has no publicly available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Without recent feedback, it’s clear that Crave's reputation is significantly stronger among hoteliers.
Edge: Crave Interactive.
Crave’s pricing is listed as a $1,200 base price, with no mention of ongoing monthly fees or implementation costs. Its straightforward pricing model makes budgeting predictable for hotels considering its deployment.
FreshBed does not publicly disclose pricing details, which could complicate budgeting and decision-making. Without transparent costs, it’s challenging to evaluate its value proposition compared to Crave.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Crave’s platform provides a proven, feature-rich in-room tablet solution with extensive user reviews, high satisfaction ratings, and a broad partner network. It enhances guest experience while optimizing operational efficiency, making it suitable for hotels that prioritize guest engagement and digital personalization.
FreshBed offers no reviews or detailed feature data, which makes it difficult to assess its effectiveness or suitability. If you want a dependable, well-supported in-room engagement tool backed by positive user feedback, Crave is the clear choice.
For hotels seeking a dedicated guest-facing tablet system, Crave’s established track record, rich feature set, and support ecosystem make it the more reliable and scalable option. While FreshBed might appeal as a property management tool, its lack of reviews and features positions it as a less certain investment in the in-room guest experience space.
In-Room Hotel Tablets pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,200/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Crave Interactive (Tablets) and FreshBed share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automatic Translations (Multi-Lingual) | ||
| Digital directory | ||
| Hotel Directory | ||
| Payments | ||
| Request Management | ||
| Room Service Ordering |
Showing top differences. 43 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Crave Tablets have transformed the way we operate at Nobu Hotel Los Cabos, significantly improving both our efficiency and the guest experience. With faster response times and pers..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuiti... Guests find the Crave tablets easy to navigate, improving the overall guest experience with streamlined access to hotel services and info. The intuitive design makes interactions seamless, leading to positive guest feedback and increased satisfaction.
Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operatio... Crave’s support team is highly praised for their responsiveness and efficiency, providing diligent assistance throughout setup and continuous operation. This has ensured a smooth experience for hotel staff and guests.
The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce... The tablets centralize information efficiently, giving guests comprehensive access to hotel resources. Though they streamline communication and reduce resource waste, the backend system is seen as needing improvements for enhanced self-update capability.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been not... Users appreciate the modern design and reliable functionality; however, the lack of sleep mode and occasional random activation at night have been noted as drawbacks, affecting guest comfort.
The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improv... The desire for advanced integration, like connecting with other devices or channels for marketing purposes, is a notable theme. Suggestions for improvement include linking tablets with TVs and allowing for personalized guest messaging strategies.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Crave Interactive (Tablets) and FreshBed share many core In-Room Hotel Tablets features, but each has unique capabilities. Crave Interactive (Tablets) offers 17 verified integration partners, while FreshBed offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Crave Interactive (Tablets) leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Crave Interactive (Tablets): No. FreshBed: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most In-Room Hotel Tablets vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Crave Interactive has an HT Score of 93 and FreshBed has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor