The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen shines .
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 100 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen users most value its , while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #29 11 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between FrondeskNextgen by Yanolja and roommaster PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational complexity, and growth plans. Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Your decision should prioritize which system aligns better with your hotel’s size, segment, and integration requirements. So, which one truly fits your hotel’s future trajectory?
FrondeskNextgen by Yanolja is a new player in the property management space with zero reviews and no recent data, suggesting limited market traction. In contrast, roommaster PMS boasts over 83 reviews, with 17 recent ones from the last six months, making its reputation more transparent and recent. While FrondeskNextgen promises a modern approach, the lack of user feedback makes it difficult to assess its real-world efficacy. Would you rather bet on a rising star or a proven system?
Your hotel should opt for FrondeskNextgen if it’s interested in exploring a relatively untested platform that might evolve quickly, especially if future updates and vendor support are a priority. If your hotel needs a mature system with established features and a broad user base, roommaster is the clear choice, especially given its extensive feature set and proven track record. For hotels seeking reliability and comprehensive functionality, roommaster is the safer, more informed pick.
Roommaster scores a 4.22 out of 5 for ease of use, supported by user reviews that praise its intuitive back-office interface and straightforward reservation management. Conversely, FrondeskNextgen’s rating is 0 out of 5, indicating no available data on usability, which raises concerns about adoption challenges. Given that recent reviews for roommaster highlight its user-friendly design, it’s evident that your team will find it easier to implement and train staff. Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster’s 60 features include channel management, POS, revenue management, online booking, guest profiles, integrated payment, and more—many of which are absent in FrondeskNextgen, which offers none. Its deep integration capabilities and rich feature set make it a comprehensive solution for managing operations end-to-end. FrondeskNextgen’s lack of detailed features and user feedback puts it at a disadvantage. Edge: roommaster.
While both products show limited recent support ratings—FrondeskNextgen at zero reviews and roommaster at 4.25 out of 5—the latter’s reviews consistently cite quick, effective support. One user emphasizes, “Support is quick and responsive, solving issues without long delays.” Without data on FrondeskNextgen support, roommaster’s reputation for dependable customer service gives it the edge. Edge: roommaster.
Roommaster boasts 56 verified integrations, including popular channel managers, POS systems, and booking engines, making it versatile for complex hotel setups. In contrast, FrondeskNextgen has zero verified integrations, limiting its connectivity and flexibility. If seamless third-party connections are vital for your operations, roommaster’s extensive integration network is clearly superior. Edge: roommaster.
With 83 reviews and recent feedback, roommaster has a 4.33 out of 5 rating, with property types like boutique hotels and resorts rating it highly. FrondeskNextgen, lacking reviews, cannot be rated yet, but the absence of feedback suggests uncertainty. For hoteliers prioritizing proven satisfaction and ongoing support, roommaster’s higher ratings speak volumes. Edge: roommaster.
FrondeskNextgen does not provide clear pricing models, suggesting it may be free, trial-based, or in early development. Roommaster charges a flat fee of $500, with no mention of ongoing costs, making it straightforward to budget. For clarity and budgeting, roommaster’s transparent pricing helps you evaluate ROI easily.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in maturity and features: roommaster has a longstanding reputation with a broad feature set, while FrondeskNextgen remains largely untested with no reviews or proven capabilities. If your hotel needs a dependable, feature-rich PMS with extensive integrations and support, roommaster is the clear choice. If your hotel seeks a flexible, future-oriented platform willing to experiment, FrondeskNextgen may hold potential, but it’s a risk.
Choosing roommaster ensures a solid foundation backed by user feedback and proven functionality, especially for properties that require comprehensive management tools. Its extensive feature set and market presence make it suitable for a wide range of hotel types—from boutique to large resorts.
Conversely, if your hotel is small, innovative, or eager to influence product development, FrondeskNextgen could offer opportunities for early adoption and customization. However, be prepared for uncertainties regarding support, usability, and feature completeness.
In conclusion, for most hotels prioritizing reliability, support, and extensive capabilities, roommaster is the safer, smarter investment. FrondeskNextgen’s future potential is intriguing but remains unverified, making it a speculative choice at this stage.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FrondeskNextgen and roommaster PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 48 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FrondeskNextgen and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FrondeskNextgen offers 0 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster PMS leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FrondeskNextgen: No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor