The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen shines .
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Ancillary revenue tracking.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, Yanolja FrondeskNextgen users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing the right Property Management System (PMS) is crucial for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest experience. You’re weighing FrondeskNextgen by Yanolja and Stayntouch, two products designed to streamline hotel management, but they differ significantly in maturity, features, and market presence. With Yanolja FrondeskNextgen offering a limited set of reviews and no recent data, while Stayntouch boasts over 300 reviews and more current feedback, the clearer choice is evident.
Both products aim to simplify hotel operations, from reservations to front desk tasks, but they diverge sharply in their development and user feedback. FrondeskNextgen, developed by Yanolja, has a near-zero rating across all categories, with no recent reviews or user testimonials to support its effectiveness. Its lack of reviews and a missing review count suggest limited adoption or data. In contrast, Stayntouch’s platform has amassed over 300 reviews, with the most recent from the last six months, providing a robust data set reflecting current user experiences.
Stayntouch’s high overall rating of 4.56/5, coupled with a 94% likelihood to recommend, demonstrates broad satisfaction among hoteliers. Conversely, FrondeskNextgen’s zero ratings and reviews make it impossible to assess its real-world performance or user satisfaction. Given the market presence, support infrastructure, and recent feedback, Stayntouch clearly outperforms FrondeskNextgen both in reliability and credibility.
Are you comfortable choosing a solution with no visible user feedback? The choice appears straightforward: Stayntouch’s proven reputation makes it the more trustworthy option.
If your hotel requires a feature-rich, extensively integrated PMS that supports multi-property management, revenue optimization, and guest engagement, then Stayntouch is the way to go. Its suite includes modules for revenue management, online check-in, guest messaging, and detailed reporting—features that are absent in FrondeskNextgen, which has no documented features.
For boutique hotels or resorts seeking a scalable, cloud-based platform with mobile capabilities and a strong partner ecosystem, Stayntouch is highly recommended. FrondeskNextgen, lacking demonstrated features and user validation, is not suitable for hotels aiming for operational sophistication or rapid growth. Its minimal or non-existent feature set makes it a risky choice for hoteliers focused on comprehensive management.
In summary, if you prioritize proven performance, extensive features, and recent user validation, Stayntouch is the clear choice. FrondeskNextgen’s lack of data and features makes it a less viable option at this stage.
Stayntouch earns a 4.7/5 ease of use score, with reviewers describing its interface as "intuitive," "friendly for operators," and "easy to learn." Its onboarding process is rated 4.58/5, and users highlight quick learning curves, often onboarding staff within days. Multiple reviews mention how staff adopt the system rapidly, with minimal training required.
FrondeskNextgen, on the other hand, has a score of 0/5 for ease of use, with no recent reviews or user comments to gauge its interface or onboarding experience. Its lack of user feedback indicates either limited adoption or unresolved usability issues.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 49 features, including revenue management, online check-in, guest profiles, integrated payment processing, and mobile apps—covering nearly every operational need. Its modules for group management, automated night audits, and digital registration provide a comprehensive management experience.
FrondeskNextgen provides no documented features or modules, making it impossible to compare. Without validated features or user testimonials, it’s clear Stayntouch’s extensive capabilities give it a decisive edge in functionality.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s support rating of 4.68/5 reflects a responsive, helpful support team, with reviews praising their onboarding, training, and ongoing assistance. Users frequently mention how their support staff go "out of their way" to ensure successful system adoption and troubleshooting.
Yanolja’s FrondeskNextgen has a support rating of 0/5, with no recent feedback or user testimonials available. The absence of support reviews indicates a lack of established support infrastructure, which can be a critical risk for hotels relying on reliable assistance.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integration partners, including major systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and various payment and channel management tools. This extensive partner network enables seamless connectivity with your existing systems and future upgrades.
Yanolja FrondeskNextgen, with no verified integrations listed, provides no evidence of third-party connectivity or ecosystem robustness. Its limited integrations significantly restrict operational flexibility.
Edge: Stayntouch.
Despite the absence of recent reviews for FrondeskNextgen, the total review count of zero indicates no current user feedback. For Stayntouch, the 317 reviews over the past six months demonstrate active use and ongoing satisfaction.
Stayntouch’s current hotel segment ratings are high, with independent hotels rating it 4.9/5 and boutique hotels at 4.93/5. The recent reviews reinforce its reputation for user satisfaction across different property types.
Edge: Stayntouch.
FrondeskNextgen’s pricing information is unavailable, and it appears to lack a free trial or standard subscription model. Its absence of transparent pricing suggests it may be a less mature product, possibly with custom or negotiated pricing.
Stayntouch charges a base fee of $800 per month, with no additional implementation or setup costs listed. Its transparent pricing model aligns with its established market presence.
Since detailed pricing for FrondeskNextgen isn’t available, Stayntouch’s clear fee structure offers better predictability for your budget.
Given the lack of features, reviews, or proven support, FrondeskNextgen might only be suitable for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
In summary, it’s best avoided unless you have very minimal needs and robust internal resources.
Stayntouch is suited for:
Not ideal if your hotel:
Stayntouch’s versatility and ongoing user satisfaction make it suitable for most mid-size to large hotels aiming for modern, flexible management.
Core Difference:
Stayntouch provides a full-featured, well-supported Cloud PMS with extensive integrations, proven user satisfaction, and a strong recent review base. FrondeskNextgen remains largely unvalidated, with no current user feedback or documented features, making it a risky choice.
When to choose Stayntouch:
If your hotel needs a stable, scalable, and feature-rich platform that enhances guest experiences and simplifies operations, Stayntouch’s proven track record and recent reviews strongly support its selection. Its comprehensive modules, integrations, and global presence are ideal for hotels seeking growth.
When to consider FrondeskNextgen:
Given the lack of data, it’s not advisable unless your hotel operates with minimal complexity, has internal technical capacity, and is comfortable experimenting with unproven solutions. Its absence of reviews and features makes it unsuitable for most hotels aiming for reliable management.
In conclusion, for most hotels evaluating a mature, well-supported PMS with recent validation, Stayntouch is the clear, evidence-backed choice. FrondeskNextgen, with no recent reviews or demonstrable features, does not yet meet the needs of modern hospitality operations.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, FrondeskNextgen and Stayntouch share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Yanolja FrondeskNextgen |
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Housekeeping module | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 37 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. FrondeskNextgen and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. FrondeskNextgen offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
FrondeskNextgen: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Yanolja FrondeskNextgen has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor