The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 25 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GMS Felix shines .
Noovy shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Payment processing and Housekeeping module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 25 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 25 |
After analyzing 25 verified reviews, GMS Felix users most value its , while Noovy users highlight ease of use, customer service, automated payment processing. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Payment Processing
▾
|
|
|
+
Direct OTAs Integration
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Design
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting Tools
▾
|
|
|
−
Translation Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #39 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #38 12 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #38 14 reviews |
| Luxury | — | #54 2 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #52 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Europe ▾ | — | #22 23 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #16 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can transform your hotel's operations, guest experiences, and profitability. GMS Felix and Noovy both aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, user feedback, and market presence. GMS Felix offers a broad, traditional approach with limited recent reviews and no available user ratings, while Noovy excels in ease of use, customer support, and recent positive reviews. Your decision hinges on your hotel's specific needs and the importance you place on current user sentiment.
GMS Felix appears to be a legacy system with minimal recent activity, whereas Noovy is a modern, full-featured platform with extensive recent reviews. Will your team prioritize proven features with direct experience, or lean towards a fresh, highly-rated solution? Let's compare both in detail.
GMS Felix aims to serve property managers with a traditional, centralized management approach. It provides basic functionalities but has zero recent reviews or ratings, casting doubt on its current relevance. Noovy, on the other hand, is a cloud-based, all-in-one PMS boasting a recent review count of 19, all from the last six months, with a high NPS score of nearly 10.
Recent reviews for Noovy highlight its user-friendly interface, reliable support, and extensive feature set—features that GMS Felix lacks entirely. Given the absence of recent feedback and the limited feature set, your hotel must decide whether to trust a legacy system or adopt a modern platform with strong, current user validation.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, modern PMS with built-in channel management, booking engine, revenue tools, and guest communication, Noovy is the clear choice. Its all-in-one design and recent 5-star reviews make it suitable for hotels seeking ease of use, quick onboarding, and reliable support.
Conversely, if your hotel prefers a simple, possibly legacy system that doesn't require recent updates or extensive features, GMS Felix might seem appealing. However, with no recent reviews or ratings, it’s difficult to assess whether it still meets modern hospitality standards. For most hotels, Noovy's recent positive feedback tips the scales.
Noovy scores a near-perfect 4.84 out of 5 for ease of use, with many reviews praising its intuitive interface, fast onboarding, and minimal staff training needed. Users mention that Noovy's straightforward design makes daily operations smoother, with reports and adjustments easily accessible.
GMS Felix, with a 0 out of 5 rating, shows no data on user experience or onboarding success, and the absence of recent reviews suggests it might be outdated or unsupported. Based on current feedback, the edge goes to Noovy for usability.
Noovy offers an extensive suite of 48 features, including channel management, integrated CRS, online booking engine, payment processing, housekeeping modules, revenue management, guest CRM, and mobile check-in. Many of these features are native, with some not available in GMS Felix at all.
GMS Felix provides no features or integrations, making it a barebones platform, if it functions at all. The number of features alone makes Noovy far more capable of supporting your hotel’s diverse needs. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy's recent reviews commend its customer support with a near-perfect rating of 4.89 out of 5 and an NPS of 9.89, highlighting quick, friendly, and effective service. Customers say support is consistent, reliable, and available 24/7, making onboarding and troubleshooting easier.
GMS Felix, with no recent reviews or ratings, offers no concrete data on support quality. Given the overwhelming positive feedback for Noovy, it’s clear which support experience is more dependable. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy boasts 40 verified partners, including major OTAs and revenue tools like Otelier and SiteMinder, supporting seamless integration. It also offers integrations with payment gateways, ID scanners, and digital registration tools, covering most operational needs.
GMS Felix, with zero verified integrations, leaves your hotel potentially disconnected from key distribution channels and financial tools. The breadth and depth of Noovy's integrations give it a decisive advantage. Edge: Noovy.
Noovy is rated 5/5 by 18 reviews, primarily from boutique, city center, and budget hotels. Its recent reviews reinforce satisfaction with ease of use, support, and features, indicating high hotel segment approval.
GMS Felix has no recent reviews or ratings, so current user sentiment cannot be gauged. The clear pattern favors Noovy, which has tangible, recent, high ratings from actual hoteliers. Edge: Noovy.
GMS Felix's pricing details are unavailable, indicating it may charge custom or legacy licensing fees, potentially making it less transparent. Noovy charges €5 per room per month with no setup or implementation fees, aligning with many modern SaaS models.
Given the clarity and affordability of Noovy's pricing, your hotel can plan budgets accordingly, unlike with GMS Felix, where costs are uncertain or hidden.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference is that Noovy is a modern, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, while GMS Felix remains a largely unverified, outdated solution. Noovy delivers a comprehensive, easy-to-use platform supported by current hoteliers, whereas GMS Felix's lack of recent data makes its ongoing viability uncertain.
If your hotel needs a reliable, all-in-one system that supports growth, automation, and guest engagement, Noovy is the clear choice thanks to its recent reviews, extensive features, and competitive pricing. For properties comfortable with a possibly outdated system and minimal support, GMS Felix might still be relevant, but the risk is significant given the lack of recent validation.
In conclusion, for most modern hoteliers seeking confidence, support, and a proven track record, Noovy offers a safer, more capable, and more future-proof investment.
According to HTR's product database, GMS and Noovy PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | GMS Felix |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Payment processing |
Showing top differences. 36 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Many reviews praise the system's ease of use, noting its user-friendly design and intuitive interface which makes training new staff quick and reduces... Many reviews praise the system's ease of use, noting its user-friendly design and intuitive interface which makes training new staff quick and reduces operational errors.
Excellent customer service is frequently mentioned, with users appreciating quick responses and effective resolutions, contributing to overall satisfa... Excellent customer service is frequently mentioned, with users appreciating quick responses and effective resolutions, contributing to overall satisfaction with the product.
The system facilitates automatic payment requests and processing, drastically simplifying billing and reducing error rates. This feature is also appre... The system facilitates automatic payment requests and processing, drastically simplifying billing and reducing error rates. This feature is also appreciated for its efficiency in handling non-refundable bookings.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate the software's functionality but note that the design is slightly outdated, though a redesign is anticipated to address this issue.
The software offers robust reporting tools that provide insights into various aspects of hotel operations, aiding in better management decisions.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GMS and Noovy PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. GMS offers 0 verified integration partners, while Noovy PMS offers 40. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Noovy PMS leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GMS: No. Noovy PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GMS Felix has an HT Score of 0 and Noovy has 71. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Custom recommendations tailored to your property