The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 100 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GODO shines , with exclusive features like Housekeeping Mobile App.
roommaster shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 100 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 100 |
After analyzing 100 verified reviews, GODO users most value its , while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #29 11 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between GODO by GODO and roommaster PMS by roommaster hinges on your hotel’s operational needs, budget, and growth plans. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in market presence, feature sets, and user feedback. Your team must weigh the importance of recent reviews, ease of use, and comprehensive integrations to decide which platform aligns best with your property’s future. Are you ready to make a confident choice?
GODO, founded in Iceland in 2012, is a newer entrant in the property management system space with no recent reviews and zero on the HTTR Score. Its limited review presence and lack of recent feedback make it difficult to gauge current user satisfaction. Conversely, roommaster PMS, established in 1994 and boasting over 83 recent reviews, enjoys a strong reputation with an overall rating of 4.33 out of 5 and an NPS score of 8.67, indicating high user loyalty.
While GODO emphasizes automation and guest review analysis with AI-driven insights, roommaster’s strengths lie in centralized operations, over 270 built-in reports, and a wide array of integrations. The contrast raises an important question: are you prioritizing proven, mature platforms or exploring less-verified options with potentially innovative features?
If your hotel needs a well-established, scalable property management platform with extensive integration options and proven customer support, choose roommaster PMS. Its versatility suits large, multi-property operators seeking robust reporting, automation, and operational control. On the other hand, if your hotel is looking for a newer, AI-focused, automation-heavy solution with multi-language support and niche features, GODO might seem appealing despite its limited review data.
For hotels requiring a mature ecosystem with proven stability, roommaster’s 83 recent reviews and high ratings make it the safer bet. If innovation and AI-driven guest insights are your primary focus, GODO’s offerings could be worth exploring, although current user feedback is absent.
roommaster PMS scores a solid 4.22 out of 5 on ease of use, supported by reviews highlighting its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and straightforward workflows. Many users describe it as “easy to train staff on” and “efficient for daily operations,” emphasizing its user-friendly design. In contrast, GODO has no publicly available ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability.
Given the extensive user feedback and proven track record, there’s a clear edge for roommaster in terms of ease of use and staff adoption. Without recent reviews or user experience data for GODO, the advantage decisively favors roommaster.
roommaster offers a comprehensive suite with 30 shared features plus an additional 30 exclusive capabilities, including EPoS, revenue management, guest profiles, integrated payment terminals, and a guest app. It supports multi-currency, channel management, online check-in/out, and digital registration, making it a full-stack solution. GODO, however, only provides four unique features: multi-currency, multi-lingual support, a housekeeping mobile app, and drag-and-drop tapechart.
While GODO’s features are limited, roommaster’s extensive capabilities cater to hotels seeking automation, detailed reporting, and seamless integrations. The clear edge lies with roommaster, especially considering its broad feature set that covers operational, guest engagement, and revenue management needs.
roommaster’s customer support ratings stand at 4.25 out of 5, with reviews praising “quick responses” and “excellent support for solving issues.” Some users note that support can sometimes be inconsistent but overall find the service dependable. GODO, lacking recent reviews and support ratings, cannot be confidently evaluated on this front.
Given the volume of recent positive feedback, roommaster’s support system currently offers a more reliable experience. The absence of recent GODO reviews leaves its support quality unverified—favoring roommaster.
roommaster provides 56 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, Volo, GuestCentric, and Inntopia, covering PMS, CRS, booking engines, and marketing tools. GODO, with only 5 verified partners, supports fewer integrations such as AeroGuest, TourDesk, Sweeply, RemoteLock, and Profitroom, primarily focusing on niche or travel tech solutions.
If your hotel depends on extensive third-party integrations for reservations, marketing, or revenue management, roommaster’s ecosystem offers a significant advantage. GODO’s limited integrations restrict its ability to serve larger or more complex operations. Edge: roommaster.
roommaster’s user reviews are recent and plentiful, with an overall rating of 4.33/5 and an NPS of 8.67. Hotels across segments—particularly boutique and mid-sized properties—appreciate its operational clarity and support. Conversely, GODO has no reviews or recent ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction.
The strong recent reviews for roommaster, especially from independent and boutique properties, give it a clear edge in customer perception. GODO’s lack of data means it cannot compete on this metric.
GODO’s pricing is listed at $1,100 per month with no free trial or freemium options. roommaster charges a lower base price of $500 per month, also without a trial period. Both require no implementation fees, but GODO’s higher monthly cost may reflect its narrower feature set.
The more economical choice for budget-conscious hotels is roommaster, especially given its extensive features and proven support. GODO’s higher cost doesn’t necessarily translate into additional value based on available data.
Hotels that primarily operate in vacation rentals or short-term rentals and need automation for guest reviews and multi-language support will find GODO suitable. Teams that seek a lightweight, AI-enhanced platform with automated review summaries and simple guest communication may benefit from GODO’s focus.
Not ideal if your hotel:
Hotels that want a fully integrated PMS with a focus on operational control should consider roommaster. It’s ideal for boutique, independent, and mid-sized properties seeking centralized data, automated reports, and multi-property management. Teams that value proven stability, extensive integrations, and detailed reporting will find roommaster’s system aligns with their needs.
Not ideal if your hotel:
The core difference is that roommaster is a mature, extensive PMS with proven reliability, broad integrations, and high user ratings, making it suitable for larger or multi-property hotels. GODO, though promising with its AI capabilities and niche features, suffers from a lack of recent reviews and a limited feature set, making it a riskier choice.
Choose roommaster if your hotel values proven stability, comprehensive tools, and extensive support. It’s ideal for properties that need to streamline operations, analyze data, and grow confidently. If you’re willing to explore a newer system with AI-driven features and your property’s scale is smaller, GODO could be worth testing, but beware of limited verified feedback.
In summary: For hotels seeking a reliable, feature-rich PMS with recent positive reviews, roommaster is the clear choice. GODO’s emerging position and limited recent data make it a less certain option, best suited for small, tech-savvy properties experimenting with automation. Your decision should align with your operational priorities, budget, and growth ambitions.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, GODO and roommaster PMS share 30 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Direct billing | ||
| Drag-n-Drop Tapechart | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Housekeeping Mobile App | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 22 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. GODO and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. GODO offers 5 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. roommaster PMS leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
GODO: No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GODO has an HT Score of 0 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor