The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 75 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
GraceSoft shines in customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Employee Messaging.
Preno shines in ease of use , with exclusive features like RevPaR & ADR Reports and GDPR Compliant.
Side-by-side ratings based on 75 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $600/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 5 | 70 |
After analyzing 75 verified reviews, GraceSoft users most value its , while Preno users highlight user-friendly interface, support and service quality, automation and efficiency. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Service Quality
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Seamless Channel Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Room for Feature Enhancements
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Management Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #36 3 reviews | #15 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #31 2 reviews | #22 6 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #20 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #35 2 reviews | #16 29 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #32 3 reviews | #15 18 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 2 reviews | #17 9 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #34 0 reviews | #13 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #24 1 reviews | #19 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #33 1 reviews | #15 10 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #17 2 reviews | #22 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #8 2 reviews |
Choosing between Easy Innkeeping by GraceSoft and Preno HMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs and operational priorities. Both aim to streamline hotel management, but each caters to different hotel types and scales. While GraceSoft offers a broader set of features, Preno's recent reviews and higher ratings suggest it’s currently better suited for most hoteliers.
Your team must consider factors like ease of use, feature set, support quality, and cost to make an informed decision. Which product aligns best with your property’s size, complexity, and growth plans?
Both Easy Innkeeping and Preno aim to simplify daily hotel operations, but they diverge in their target markets and feature depth. Easy Innkeeping emphasizes an all-in-one system that covers reservations, guest communications, and CRM, primarily for small to midsized properties. Preno, on the other hand, focuses on automation, channel management, and billing, making it more adaptable for a variety of hotel types, especially those seeking robust integration.
Recent reviews favor Preno, with a higher overall rating and more current feedback. Given the limited review count for Easy Innkeeping, do its core features meet your hotel’s current and future needs?
If your hotel needs an affordable, straightforward management system with basic reservation and guest communication functions, Easy Innkeeping could suffice. It’s suitable for small properties or those with limited technical staff, especially considering its $300 base price and straightforward onboarding.
However, if your hotel requires a more modern, scalable solution with strong channel management, automation, and integrations, Preno is the better choice. Its $600 pricing reflects its broader feature set and recent positive reviews, especially from mid-sized properties seeking efficiency gains.
Your decision should align with your property’s complexity: simple operations or growth-focused automation.
Ease of use is crucial for staff adoption and operational efficiency. GraceSoft’s Easy Innkeeping scores 4.4/5 in user ratings, with reviews praising its support team and ease of navigation. However, some users note limitations in offline capabilities, which could hinder staff in areas with unstable internet.
Preno outperforms here, with a 4.86/5 rating and glowing reviews about its intuitive interface and quick learning curve. Users highlight its streamlined workflows and responsive support, making onboarding faster and smoother.
Edge: Preno.
Easy Innkeeping offers 21 features unique to its platform, including multi-currency support, gift vouchers, guest messaging, online check-in/out, integrated payment terminals, and a built-in CRM. These features cater to properties that prefer comprehensive management without needing multiple systems.
Preno provides 2 exclusive features—RevPaR & ADR reports and GDPR compliance—and shares 27 features with Easy Innkeeping. However, Preno’s features are more focused on automation, channel management, and billing, making it more suitable for properties prioritizing operational efficiency.
Edge: Easy Innkeeping, due to its broader feature set.
GraceSoft’s customer support rates a perfect 5/5, with reviews consistently praising their responsiveness and courteous service. Hotel managers note that GraceSoft’s team is always available to resolve issues promptly, making it ideal for properties that value strong vendor support.
Preno supports its users well, with a 4.69/5 rating. Its support team is responsive and helpful, but some reviews suggest that 24/7 support isn’t always guaranteed, especially outside peak hours.
Edge: Easy Innkeeping.
Preno leads significantly, with 17 verified integrations, including major tools like Xero, TrustYou, SiteMinder, and Revinate. It also connects with popular booking channels, simplifying operations for properties with diverse tech stacks.
GraceSoft, with zero verified integrations, may limit your options if you rely on third-party tools. Its direct integrations with OTAs are limited or absent, which could increase manual workload.
Edge: Preno.
Based on recent reviews, Preno’s overall rating of 4.86/5 surpasses Easy Innkeeping’s 4.4/5. It also boasts a 9.48/10 NPS score, indicating high customer satisfaction. The majority of recent reviews praise Preno for ease of use, automation, and support.
Easy Innkeeping’s reviews are more limited, primarily praising its support team, but lack the volume and recency to challenge Preno’s standing. For most hotels, Preno’s higher ratings reflect better overall satisfaction.
Edge: Preno.
Easy Innkeeping charges a flat $300 monthly fee with no implementation or trial costs. Its pricing makes it attractive for small properties with limited budgets seeking essential features.
Preno’s pricing is $600 per month, also without implementation or trial options. Its higher cost reflects its advanced features, integrations, and automation capabilities intended for hotels seeking growth and efficiency.
Neither product offers a free tier beyond trial periods, so your choice may depend on your budget and feature needs.
Hotels that should consider Easy Innkeeping:
Not ideal if:
Hotels that should consider Preno:
Not ideal if:
Preno offers a stronger overall package, with more recent reviews, higher ratings, and a broader set of integrations. Its cloud-based platform appeals especially to hotels aiming for automation and efficiency.
Easy Innkeeping is a viable choice for small properties with simple needs and limited budgets, but its limited integrations and offline issues could hinder growth. For most hoteliers, Preno’s modern features and positive user feedback make it the better option.
If your property values ease of use and strong support, Easy Innkeeping might suffice. But for scalability, automation, and a better overall experience, Preno is the clear winner.
According to HTR's product database, Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) and Preno HMS share 27 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Employee Messaging | ||
| GDPR Compliant | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| RevPaR & ADR Reports | ||
| Shift Planning |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Preno's user-friendly interface receives high praise from users. Many note the simplicity and intuitiveness of the system, which significantly reduces... Preno's user-friendly interface receives high praise from users. Many note the simplicity and intuitiveness of the system, which significantly reduces the learning curve. This allows for quick onboarding of staff, even those with limited technical skills, thus speeding up operations.
Customers generally value Preno's responsive customer support, with live chat and comprehensive help resources highlighted as beneficial. However, som... Customers generally value Preno's responsive customer support, with live chat and comprehensive help resources highlighted as beneficial. However, some reviews mention the need for more consistent 24/7 service availability.
Users frequently mention Preno's automation features, which streamline administrative tasks such as invoicing and reporting. This automation saves sig... Users frequently mention Preno's automation features, which streamline administrative tasks such as invoicing and reporting. This automation saves significant time and reduces manual errors, enabling staff to focus more on guest experiences.
Where hoteliers push back
Despite positive feedback, users note areas for enhancement. Suggested improvements include advanced reporting, better mobile app functionality, and e... Despite positive feedback, users note areas for enhancement. Suggested improvements include advanced reporting, better mobile app functionality, and enhanced guest interaction tools. These updates are seen as necessary to keep up with evolving industry demands.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) and Preno HMS share many core Hotel Management Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ) offers 0 verified integration partners, while Preno HMS offers 17. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Preno HMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Easy Innkeeping (by GraceSoft ): No. Preno HMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Management Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. GraceSoft has an HT Score of 0 and Preno has 76. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor