The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 573 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Feedier shines , with exclusive features like In app call back and SMS Text Based Surveys.
GuestRevu shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.8/5) , with exclusive features like Guest satisfaction surveys and Email.
Side-by-side ratings based on 573 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 573 |
After analyzing 573 verified reviews, Feedier users most value its , while GuestRevu users highlight survey reach and efficiency, dashboard and analytics, automated reporting. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Survey Reach and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Dashboard and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization Options
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Experience
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Guest Survey Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #7 0 reviews | #1 203 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #12 0 reviews | #1 246 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #1 22 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #12 0 reviews | #1 254 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #1 281 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #1 119 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 51 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #10 0 reviews | #2 45 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #8 0 reviews | #1 120 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #1 23 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #1 5 reviews |
Choosing the right guest survey software can significantly impact your hotel's reputation and guest satisfaction. Feedier aims to automate and quantify feedback collection with an AI-driven approach, while GuestRevu emphasizes customizable surveys, reputation management, and seamless integrations. Both tools promise to improve guest insights, but their capabilities and user experiences differ markedly. Your choice hinges on your hotel’s priorities: automation and simplicity or customization and reputation tracking.
Feedier offers an intuitive platform with automation at its core, but it has no recent reviews or high user ratings. GuestRevu, by contrast, boasts a highly-rated, well-reviewed platform with extensive user feedback, making it the more reliable option for today’s hoteliers.
Both Feedier and GuestRevu serve to gather and analyze guest feedback, but they diverge in execution. Feedier promotes automatic, real-time feedback collection using AI summaries and recommendations, aiming to reduce manual effort. GuestRevu focuses on customizable surveys, reputation management, and integration with online review platforms, offering more control and visibility.
Feedier’s lack of recent reviews or industry recognition raises questions about its current market relevance, whereas GuestRevu’s recent surge in reviews and high ratings underscore its established presence. Are you seeking a straightforward, automated approach or a flexible, reputation-focused platform? The decision depends on your hotel’s specific needs.
If your hotel needs automated feedback collection with minimal manual input, go with Feedier. Its AI-driven features aim to provide quick, quantifiable insights without extensive customization. However, if your hotel values detailed, brand-branded surveys and comprehensive reputation management, GuestRevu is the clear choice, especially given its 491 reviews and 4.62/5 rating, overwhelmingly higher than Feedier’s negligible presence.
For hotels that want a tool proven to boost online reviews and understand guest sentiment deeply, GuestRevu offers a more stable, well-supported platform. Conversely, Feedier may appeal to tech-savvy teams eager to experiment with AI-driven feedback, albeit with less recent validation.
GuestRevu earns a higher ease-of-use rating (4.68/5) based on recent reviews praising its intuitive dashboard, simple survey creation, and straightforward reporting. Its onboarding process is also rated highly, with users noting minimal learning curves. Feedier, on the other hand, has no recent reviews or ratings, making its user-friendliness impossible to assess accurately.
Given the consistent praise from users, edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu offers 9 unique features, including NPS, social review tracking, customizable questions, conditional logic, and responsive surveys, making it a robust tool for reputation management. Feedier provides only 3 exclusive features: in-app callback, SMS text surveys, and review routing, which are valuable but limited in scope.
GuestRevu’s broader feature set enables more detailed and targeted feedback collection, making it better suited for hotels seeking granular guest insights. Edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu’s support is highly praised, with a 4.76/5 rating and recent reviews highlighting its responsiveness and proactive approach. Users describe the support team as helpful, guiding them through onboarding and ongoing issues. Feedier does not have recent review data, so its support quality remains unverified.
Given the proven satisfaction and responsiveness, edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu integrates with 40 verified partners, including major PMS and booking systems like Criton, RoomRaccoon, and HotelTime, ensuring compatibility with existing hotel tech stacks. Feedier currently lists no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management tools.
For hotels relying on integrated systems, the clear edge: GuestRevu.
GuestRevu’s recent reviews and high overall ratings (4.62/5, 491 reviews) reflect strong hotel satisfaction across multiple segments, including boutique and luxury hotels. Feedier, with no recent reviews or ratings, cannot be reliably benchmarked, but its absence from recent major review sites suggests it is not currently favored.
Edge: GuestRevu.
Feedier does not publicly list pricing or trial options, indicating it may lack transparency or be tailored to enterprise clients. GuestRevu charges a straightforward starting price of $100/month, with no free tier, making it easier for hotels to budget and compare.
Given the transparency and affordability, edge: GuestRevu.
Not ideal if your hotel needs extensive customization, integrations, or proven support, as Feedier’s recent review activity is nearly nonexistent.
Not ideal if you are seeking an extremely low-cost, simple survey tool without integration needs or detailed customization.
Feedier positions itself as an AI-driven guest feedback platform focusing on automation and quick insights, but its lack of recent reviews and validation limit its current relevance. GuestRevu, with its 491 recent reviews, high ratings, and extensive feature set, offers a more dependable and scalable solution for most hotels today.
If your hotel needs a proven reputation management tool with a broad feature set and strong support, guest: GuestRevu. Its ability to integrate, customize, and provide actionable insights makes it the safer, smarter choice.
However, if you seek a niche, automated feedback system and are comfortable experimenting with a less validated platform, Feedier might be worth exploring—but proceed cautiously given its limited recent feedback.
According to HTR's product database, Feedier and GuestRevu (Surveys) share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Certified TripAdvisor Review Collection Partner | ||
| Conditional logic | ||
| Customizable questions | ||
| In app call back | ||
| Responsive surveys | ||
| Review Routing | ||
| SMS Text Based Surveys | ||
| Segmented surveys | ||
| Social review tracking |
We analyzed 7 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"GuestRevu has helped us so much over the past two years as we see our small business growing – the reviews from guests are like gold, and most of our bookings have been made becaus..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since implementing GuestRevu, our complaints have actually come down, because of the fact that we have so many repeat guests and now we can interact with them in much more detail...."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
GuestRevu’s surveys, sent across multiple channels, effectively capture guest feedback. Users note that the tool helps in maintaining high response ra... GuestRevu’s surveys, sent across multiple channels, effectively capture guest feedback. Users note that the tool helps in maintaining high response rates and tailoring questions to gather valuable insights, although further refinement in survey design capabilities is suggested.
The platform's user-friendly dashboards offer clear visual insights, helping hotels track performance and identify service improvement areas. Users ap... The platform's user-friendly dashboards offer clear visual insights, helping hotels track performance and identify service improvement areas. Users appreciate the ease of navigation, although deeper analytical features could provide even richer data insights.
GuestRevu's automated reporting feature is highly valued for providing clear, actionable insights that aid in decision-making and efficiency. The syst... GuestRevu's automated reporting feature is highly valued for providing clear, actionable insights that aid in decision-making and efficiency. The system generates comprehensive reports that help hotels identify trends and areas needing attention, saving time in data interpretation to improve guest experiences.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate GuestRevu's integration with existing systems like PMS and CRM, which streamlines feedback management. However, there are calls for m... Users appreciate GuestRevu's integration with existing systems like PMS and CRM, which streamlines feedback management. However, there are calls for more PMS/OTA partnerships and deeper integration options to expand compatibility and improve workflows, highlighting a gap in its current offering.
The lack of a dedicated mobile app is noted by users looking for real-time, on-the-go access to feedback and reporting. While the desktop experience i... The lack of a dedicated mobile app is noted by users looking for real-time, on-the-go access to feedback and reporting. While the desktop experience is praised, improvements in mobile functionality are desired to enhance convenience.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Feedier and GuestRevu (Surveys) share many core Guest Survey Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Feedier offers 0 verified integration partners, while GuestRevu (Surveys) offers 40. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. GuestRevu (Surveys) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Feedier: No. GuestRevu (Surveys): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Survey Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Feedier has an HT Score of 0 and GuestRevu has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor