The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 35 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Hilton shines .
Shiji Group shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 35 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 34 |
After analyzing 35 verified reviews, Hilton users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #60 1 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #52 0 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #60 1 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #56 1 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #40 1 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #5 14 reviews |
When evaluating property management systems (PMS), your hotel faces a choice between Hilton OnQ and Shiji Daylight PMS. Hilton OnQ, designed in-house for Hilton’s extensive portfolio, is a proprietary system with deep integration within the Hilton ecosystem. Shiji Daylight PMS is a cloud-native, scalable platform used by a diverse range of properties worldwide, emphasizing modern design and broad third-party integrations. Both aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experience, but their approaches and maturity differ significantly.
The critical factor is their market presence, user feedback, and feature sets. Hilton OnQ’s limited reviews and outdated perception contrast sharply with Shiji Group’s large, recent review base and contemporary features. Which of these platforms better supports your hotel’s goals?
Hilton OnQ is a tailored, in-house PMS built specifically for Hilton’s properties, offering tight integration with Hilton’s brand standards and infrastructure. Its primary problem is its obsolescence—many reviews mention that it was designed in the 1990s and has not kept pace with modern hotel technology. Shiji Daylight PMS, on the other hand, is a cloud-native platform with a modern interface, boasting over 30 reviews in the past six months, all of which are recent and highly positive. Its user-friendly design and extensive feature set are praised, making it a more adaptable choice for hotels outside the Hilton ecosystem.
Both systems aim to streamline daily operations, but Hilton’s solution is deeply embedded within Hilton’s proprietary environment, offering limited flexibility. Shiji PMS’s open architecture allows greater integration and customization. Are you looking for a system built specifically for Hilton or a flexible, scalable platform suitable for diverse hotel types?
If your hotel is part of Hilton’s franchise or managed under Hilton’s brand standards, OnQ might be a natural fit, especially if deep integration with Hilton’s reservation and loyalty systems is crucial. However, given Hilton’s outdated tech perception and limited recent reviews, it’s evident that support and usability are concerns. For independent hotels or chains seeking a contemporary, feature-rich PMS with high customer satisfaction and recent positive feedback, Shiji Daylight PMS is the clearer choice.
Shiji Group’s offering is ideal if your hotel values ease of use, automation, extensive integrations, and a scalable cloud platform. Conversely, Hilton OnQ could be suitable if your operations are heavily tied to Hilton’s infrastructure, and you prioritize brand-specific features over modern interface considerations. Which approach aligns better with your strategic goals?
Hilton OnQ’s user experience receives a dismal 1/5 rating, with reviews highlighting its obsolete interface and poor support. Staff spend excessive hours troubleshooting, and many find it challenging to adapt to its outdated workflows. Conversely, Shiji Daylight PMS scores an impressive 4.63/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its intuitive design, comprehensive training materials, and straightforward task management. Hotel staff find it simple to learn and operate, leading to quicker onboarding and less frustration.
Edge: Shiji Group.
Hilton OnQ offers minimal features—being a proprietary system with limited capabilities—without detailed third-party integrations or advanced automation. Shiji Group, by contrast, boasts over 98 features, including guest profiles, multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, guest messaging, automation tools, and extensive reporting. It also supports multi-currency and mobile app access, features that Hilton OnQ does not visibly provide.
With the broad scope of features, automation, and integrations available in Shiji, it outstrips Hilton OnQ’s limited capabilities. Which features matter most for your hotel’s operations?
Edge: Shiji Group.
Hilton’s support ratings are abysmally low, with a 1/5 score and reviews describing their tech support as time-consuming and ineffective. Many hoteliers report spending hours with Hilton’s support team without resolution. Shiji Group’s support, rated 4.53/5, is praised for responsiveness, helpfulness, and proactive assistance, with reviews emphasizing the ease of implementation and ongoing help.
Given recent reviews and support ratings, Shiji’s customer service clearly exceeds Hilton’s. Edge: Shiji Group.
Hilton OnQ integrates with a small set of six verified partners, mainly internal Hilton tools or a few select vendors. Shiji Group, however, connects with 64 verified partners, including major booking engines, revenue management systems, POS, and CRM platforms. Shared integrations include Actabl, but Shiji’s extensive partner list offers greater flexibility and customization.
If seamless integration is essential for your hotel, Shiji Group’s ecosystem provides a broader, more reliable set of options. Edge: Shiji Group.
With only one review in the past six months, Hilton OnQ lacks recent, meaningful feedback. Its previous reviews highlight frustrations with outdated technology and support issues. Shiji Group, with 32 reviews, maintains a 74.69/100 score and consistently high ratings for usability, support, and features, with an 8.94/10 NPS score indicating strong customer loyalty.
For current, positive feedback, Shiji Group is the clear favorite. Edge: Shiji Group.
Hilton OnQ’s pricing details are unavailable, likely included as part of Hilton’s internal infrastructure. Shiji Daylight PMS charges a base price of $1,200, with no mention of ongoing fees or implementation costs, making it transparent and straightforward.
Considering value, Shiji’s pricing aligns with its extensive feature set and support. Hilton OnQ’s hidden costs and lack of transparency suggest it may not be cost-effective outside Hilton’s direct management. Edge: Shiji Group.
Hilton OnQ’s primary advantage is its integration within Hilton’s global infrastructure. However, its outdated interface and support issues make it less suitable for hotels seeking contemporary solutions.
Not ideal if: You want a modern, flexible PMS; prioritize ease of use; or plan to operate independently of Hilton’s ecosystem.
Shiji’s platform is versatile, supporting a wide array of property types and operational models. It’s especially useful if you want a system that can grow with your hotel.
Not ideal if: Your hotel needs ultra-specific or niche features not covered by standard modules, or if you require on-premise solutions.
The core difference is that Hilton OnQ is a proprietary system designed exclusively for Hilton properties, while Shiji Daylight PMS is a flexible, cloud-based platform suitable for a variety of hotel types. Hilton’s solution is embedded within Hilton’s ecosystem, offering depth of integration but suffering from outdated technology and poor support. Shiji Group offers a modern, feature-rich experience with high customer satisfaction, broad integrations, and a scalable architecture.
Choose Hilton OnQ if your hotel operates solely within Hilton’s brand standards and you need deep internal integration. Opt for Shiji Daylight PMS if your hotel requires a contemporary system, extensive features, and reliable support—especially if you’re an independent or international property. For most hotels seeking agility and modern capabilities, Shiji is the superior choice.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Hilton OnQ and Shiji Daylight PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 86 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Hilton OnQ and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Hilton OnQ offers 6 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 1.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Hilton OnQ: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Hilton has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor