The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 33 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Amadeus shines in onboarding , with exclusive features like Virtual logbook and Service Recovery/Escalation.
Hoxell shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Team goal setting (e.g. rewards sign-ups, satisfaction) and File Library Support (images, documents and videos).
Side-by-side ratings based on 33 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 3 | 30 |
After analyzing 33 verified reviews, Amadeus users most value its , while Hoxell users highlight operational efficiency, quality control & customer service, user-friendly interface. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Quality Control & Customer Service
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Departmental Integration & Communication
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
PMS Integration
▾
|
|
|
−
Reporting & Tracking
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Housekeeping Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #16 0 reviews | #12 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 1 reviews | #11 23 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #15 2 reviews | #12 4 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #12 0 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #17 1 reviews | #11 12 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #16 1 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #17 1 reviews | #12 11 reviews |
| Extended Stay | #18 0 reviews | #17 1 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #11 2 reviews | #22 3 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #14 0 reviews | #7 27 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #13 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between HotSOS® Housekeeping by Amadeus and Hoxell hinges on what your hotel prioritizes. Both streamline housekeeping tasks and internal communication, but they approach these goals differently. Amadeus focuses on automation and real-time PMS integration rooted in large-scale hotel operations, while Hoxell emphasizes departmental integration, ease of use, and real-time task management for a broader range of property types.
If your hotel needs a well-established platform with extensive integrations and automation, Amadeus may be ideal. However, if you prioritize a more modern, user-friendly interface with strong departmental connectivity, Hoxell’s recent reviews suggest it’s a more reliable choice. Which features and support qualities matter most for your team?
If your hotel requires a proven, scalable solution with numerous integrations and advanced automation tools, go with Amadeus. Its platform is supported by over 104 verified partners and is suited for large resorts or multi-property groups aiming to optimize housekeeping workflows through automation and PMS synchronization.
Conversely, if your hotel values a highly rated user experience with quick onboarding and departmental communication, Hoxell is the superior choice. With 28 reviews—significantly more recent—hotels across Europe and North America praise its ease of use, real-time updates, and departmental coordination. It’s ideal for boutique hotels, city center properties, or hotels seeking a flexible, scalable platform.
Amadeus scores a perfect 5/5 for ease of use, with reviews highlighting its simple interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training needs. Its user-friendly design is reinforced by a high onboarding rating of 5/5, with hotels enjoying immediate staff adoption and positive feedback about managing employee productivity.
Hoxell, with a 4.89/5 ease-of-use rating, is also highly rated but slightly behind Amadeus. Users emphasize its intuitive graphic interface, which makes task management straightforward, and praise its fast support team. It’s praised for its ease of onboarding, with a rating of 4.68/5, though some note PMS integration complexities.
Edge: Amadeus.
Amadeus offers four features exclusive to its platform: Virtual Logbook, Service Recovery/Escalation, Compensation Tracking, and an Open API—tools that enhance automation, accountability, and customization. Its overall feature count sits at 35, ensuring a comprehensive housekeeping management system.
Hoxell, with three unique features—Team Goal Setting, File Library Support, and Work Prioritization—focuses on departmental engagement and task prioritization. Its total feature count is 31, emphasizing integrated communication, task management, and guest feedback tools.
Edge: Amadeus, due to its wider feature set and advanced automation capabilities.
Hoxell’s customer support earns a near-perfect 4.98/5, with recent reviews calling support “fast,” “responsive,” and “indispensable.” Users praise the team for quick resolution times and proactive assistance, which minimizes operational downtime.
Amadeus, with a support rating of 1.83/5, faces frequent criticism. Reviewers report slow response times, unreturned calls, and frustration over unresolved issues, with some describing the help desk as “great” but support from account managers as “lacking.” This support gap is a significant consideration.
Edge: Hoxell.
Amadeus’s platform boasts 104 verified partners, including major property management systems like Oracle Hospitality, Mews, and RevControl. Its extensive partner network supports broad customization and automation options for large hotels and chains.
Hoxell integrates with 12 partners, including PMS providers like Vertical Booking and hotelcube. Common integrations with Amadeus include Mews and Host Hotel Systems, but its smaller ecosystem limits extensive automation.
Edge: Amadeus.
Hoxell’s 28 recent reviews average a 4.94/5 rating, reflecting high satisfaction among diverse hotel types—especially city center and boutique hotels. Guests praise its user-friendly interface, quick support, and departmental coordination.
Amadeus, with only 3 reviews, carries a 4/5 rating, with some praise for speed and communication but notable criticism about support responsiveness. The limited recent feedback makes it less reliable as a current choice.
Edge: Hoxell.
Amadeus does not publicly disclose its pricing, suggesting a bespoke quote based on hotel size and needs. Its pricing model appears to be enterprise-level, potentially involving implementation fees and ongoing costs.
Hoxell charges a flat $300 monthly fee, with no setup or implementation fees, and offers transparent pricing suitable for hotels of various sizes. This straightforward pricing makes budgeting easier.
Note: Both platforms do not offer free trials, so verify detailed costs before committing.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in their approach: Amadeus is a broader, automation-heavy system built for large-scale hotels, while Hoxell excels in departmental communication and ease of use for a wider range of properties.
Choose Amadeus if your hotel needs extensive integrations, automation, and a proven track record in large operations. Its feature set and partner ecosystem support complex workflows, making it suitable for resorts and multi-property groups.
Opt for Hoxell if your hotel values real-time communication, quick onboarding, and strong support—especially if you operate in Europe or North America and prefer a user-friendly platform. Its high reviewer ratings and recent data suggest it’s the more reliable choice for smaller and mid-sized hotels.
If you seek advanced automation and extensive integration, Amadeus is the clear choice. For departmental coordination, ease of use, and excellent support, Hoxell stands out as the better option for most hotels today.
According to HTR's product database, Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping and Hoxell share 31 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Compensation Tracking | ||
| File Library Support (images, documents and videos) | ||
| Open API | ||
| Service Recovery/Escalation | ||
| Team goal setting (e.g. rewards sign-ups, satisfaction) | ||
| Virtual logbook | ||
| Work Prioritization |
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently mention how Hoxell streamlines daily operations and improves productivity. The tool helps manage work shifts, track tasks in real-tim... Users frequently mention how Hoxell streamlines daily operations and improves productivity. The tool helps manage work shifts, track tasks in real-time, and coordinate maintenance, ultimately saving time and making operations smoother.
Hoxell helps hotels maintain high-quality standards through efficient task tracking and streamlined internal communication, which directly impacts gue... Hoxell helps hotels maintain high-quality standards through efficient task tracking and streamlined internal communication, which directly impacts guest satisfaction. The tool also enhances customer service capabilities by addressing maintenance issues swiftly and keeping housekeeping aligned.
The tool’s intuitive interface receives high praise for being easy to navigate, which streamlines training and daily use. Even staff with minimal tech... The tool’s intuitive interface receives high praise for being easy to navigate, which streamlines training and daily use. Even staff with minimal tech experience find it manageable, facilitating smoother adoption and usage across departments.
Where hoteliers push back
While many users appreciate Hoxell's integration capabilities, some have noted challenges with integrating the software with their Property Management... While many users appreciate Hoxell's integration capabilities, some have noted challenges with integrating the software with their Property Management Systems (PMS), particularly regarding guest references and communication errors.
Hoxell offers robust reporting features, but some users mention the need for more customizable options and improved integration with other systems for... Hoxell offers robust reporting features, but some users mention the need for more customizable options and improved integration with other systems for better report download and editing capabilities.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping and Hoxell share many core Housekeeping Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping offers 104 verified integration partners, while Hoxell offers 12. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Amadeus - HotSOS® Housekeeping: No. Hoxell: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Housekeeping Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Amadeus has an HT Score of 0 and Hoxell has 74. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor