The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 292 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HS/3 shines .
innRoad shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 292 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $300/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 292 |
After analyzing 292 verified reviews, HS/3 users most value its , while innRoad users highlight customer support, reporting and revenue management, booking engine and ota integration. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine and OTA Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Tape Chart
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System Glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Credit Card Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Compatibility and App
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #6 179 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #16 47 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #13 11 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #9 5 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #12 96 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #15 45 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #16 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #13 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 275 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #34 5 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #39 1 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #34 0 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is a critical step for your hotel’s operational efficiency, revenue growth, and guest satisfaction. Both HS/3 (acq Mews) and innRoad aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in terms of maturity, features, and user experience. While HS/3 offers a robust platform, it lacks recent reviews and a clear user score. InnRoad, with over 238 recent reviews and a high 4.7/5 rating, provides a more proven and trusted solution for hoteliers.
What’s the best option for your specific hotel needs? Let’s compare these two solutions directly.
HS/3 is a newer, less reviewed platform with no recent user feedback, making its reliability and feature set less certain. InnRoad, on the other hand, boasts a high overall rating, 238 recent reviews, and a clear track record of delivering operational improvements, especially in revenue and bookings. InnRoad’s extensive feature list and positive recent reviews suggest it’s the stronger choice.
Your team needs a system that reliably manages reservations, guest communication, and operations. InnRoad’s current high user satisfaction indicates it’s more likely to meet your needs and adapt to your hotel’s evolving requirements.
If your hotel prioritizes a proven, feature-rich PMS with high user satisfaction and recent reviews, go with innRoad. It’s especially suitable for properties seeking to boost bookings, improve operation, and rely on a system with extensive integration options.
Choose HS/3 if your hotel is looking for a platform that might be more customizable in the future or is considering a lower-cost entry, but be aware of its lack of recent user feedback and reviews. InnRoad’s large user base and recent high ratings make it the safer, more reliable choice for active hoteliers.
InnRoad scores a 4.49/5 for ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive interface, drag-and-drop tape chart, and straightforward reservation management. HS/3 has no current ratings or recent reviews, so its usability remains unverified, but its interface is described as user-friendly in prior AI summaries.
Given the extensive recent positive feedback for innRoad, especially around ease of staff adoption and onboarding, it’s clearly the easier system to implement and train your team on.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers 56 unique features, including multi-currency, channel management, booking engine, guest messaging, revenue management, and online check-in, among others. HS/3 has no verified features or recent updates, making its capabilities uncertain.
innRoad’s wide feature set, especially its native booking engine, OTA integrations, and guest communication tools, surpasses HS/3 by a significant margin. If comprehensive functionality is a priority, innRoad is the clear winner.
Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad’s customer support scores an impressive 4.54/5, with many reviews praising its 24/7 live support and dedicated onboarding advisors. InnRoad users also highlight fast, professional responses and proactive assistance.
HS/3 has no recent reviews or ratings, so support quality remains unverified. InnRoad’s proven support track record makes it the better choice for hoteliers who depend on reliable assistance.
Edge: innRoad.
innRoad integrates with 34 verified partners, including major OTAs, Quickbooks, Revinate, RateGain, and other revenue tools. HS/3 reports no verified integrations or partner network, limiting its ability to connect with other systems.
innRoad’s extensive integration network ensures your hotel can connect with your existing tools and expand easily. This is a key advantage for hotels aiming for operational flexibility.
Edge: innRoad.
InnRoad receives a 4.7/5 rating based on 238 recent reviews, with high marks across ease of use, customer support, and overall satisfaction. Its ratings are consistent across different hotel segments, including boutique, motels, resorts, and budget properties.
HS/3 has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to gauge user sentiment or satisfaction. InnRoad’s strong ratings clearly favor it as the preferred solution.
Edge: innRoad.
HS/3’s pricing is not publicly available and may involve custom quotes or negotiations. InnRoad charges $300/month, with no hidden fees or additional charges, providing transparent, predictable costs.
Given innRoad’s clear pricing model and positive ROI claims—hotels often see a 20% lift in bookings—your team can budget confidently. HS/3’s unclear pricing makes cost comparison difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel values quick deployment, proven support, or relies on existing integrations.
Not ideal if your hotel’s focus is on complex customization that requires a highly tailored system or if mobile compatibility is a priority (noted as an area for improvement).
InnRoad stands out as the more mature, well-rated PMS with a proven track record of increasing revenue and simplifying operations. Its extensive feature set, high user satisfaction, and active support community make it the safer choice for hotels looking to grow and improve.
Choose innRoad if your hotel values ease of use, reliability, and direct contributions to revenue. HS/3 might appeal to properties with specific customization needs or a preference for future development, but its lack of recent reviews and verified support make it a less certain option today.
In summary, for active hoteliers seeking a trustworthy, feature-rich PMS with recent positive feedback, innRoad is the clear recommendation.
According to HTR's product database, HS/3 (acq Mews) and innRoad share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Group Booking Engine | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 44 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
What hoteliers love
While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, u... While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, users find the 24/7 support invaluable for troubleshooting any issues.
The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dy... The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dynamically adjust room rates and increase profitability. Some users suggest further report customization for more tailored insights.
Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to si... Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to significant revenue boosts for many properties. However, issues were noted with third-party integrations sometimes losing details.
Where hoteliers push back
Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system perf... Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system performing slowly at times. These issues occasionally impact booking and check-in processes.
InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes.... InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes. The inclusion of PCI compliance and secure payment processing is appreciated.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HS/3 (acq Mews) and innRoad share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HS/3 (acq Mews) offers 0 verified integration partners, while innRoad offers 34. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. innRoad leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HS/3 (acq Mews): No. innRoad: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HS/3 has an HT Score of 0 and innRoad has 31. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor