The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 210 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 210 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 209 |
After analyzing 210 verified reviews, HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #57 1 reviews | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #69 0 reviews | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #55 0 reviews | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #44 1 reviews | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is crucial for your hotel's success. Both HUGO and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline operations, but they diverge significantly in scale, features, and user experience. HUGO emphasizes a simple interface with a focus on core functionality, while RoomRaccoon offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform. Which system will meet your specific needs better?
HUGO has a tiny review footprint with no recent or overall reviews, making it difficult to gauge its current performance. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, boasts over 169 reviews, with recent feedback highlighting its strengths. Are you willing to trust a system with limited feedback or prefer a platform with proven, current user satisfaction?
HUGO and RoomRaccoon serve different hotel segments and operational needs. HUGO’s minimal reviews suggest it may suit small, straightforward hotels that prioritize simplicity and basic functionality. RoomRaccoon’s high review count and recent positive feedback indicate it caters well to small to medium-sized independent hotels seeking an all-in-one solution.
HUGO’s reviews mention a user-friendly interface but criticize poor support and unreliable tech. RoomRaccoon’s reviews praise its ease of use, automation, and broad feature set, though some mention bugs and support delays. Which aligns better with your hotel’s operational complexity and support expectations?
If your hotel is an independent operation with a focus on automating reservations, guest communication, and revenue management, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its all-in-one platform consolidates PMS, channel management, booking engine, and CRM, ideal for small hotels that want to grow without system fragmentation.
If your hotel needs only core management features with minimal fuss and you are comfortable risking less support and fewer integrations, HUGO might suffice. However, given the lack of recent reviews and low overall ratings, RoomRaccoon’s proven track record makes it the stronger pick for most hotels seeking reliable, scalable management.
RoomRaccoon’s UI scores 4.74/5, with many users describing it as intuitive and user-friendly. Its onboarding process receives positive remarks, and staff adoption is generally smooth, supported by automation features that reduce manual effort. Conversely, HUGO’s UI ratings are unknown, but reviews indicate its interface is simple, though support and reliability issues overshadow usability.
RoomRaccoon’s mobile app and comprehensive dashboard make daily management straightforward, and many users highlight how easily new staff can learn the system. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon offers 51 exclusive features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, guest CRM, automated night audit, and integrated EPoS. It stands out for its extensive automation, dynamic pricing, and detailed reporting, making it a complete operational toolkit.
HUGO claims no unique features or integrations, focusing on basic property management functions. Its minimal feature set puts it at a disadvantage when compared to RoomRaccoon’s broad capabilities. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s support rating is 4.53/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Users appreciate how support agents assist quickly, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting, despite some noting occasional delays.
HUGO’s reviews do not mention support, and its ratings are unavailable. Given the recent and numerous reviews, RoomRaccoon clearly leads in support quality. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon integrates with 88 verified partners, supporting seamless connections with popular OTAs, payment providers, and revenue tools. Shared integrations include Guestnet and Flexkeeping, while it also connects with Sage, Paxxio, and RevControl.
HUGO has only 7 verified partners and fewer integrations, limiting its flexibility. Its integrations are mainly with local or niche systems, which might hinder larger or more complex operations. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating is an impressive 4.88/5, with recent reviews reinforcing its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth. Its high Net Promoter Score (9.09/5) indicates strong advocacy among users.
HUGO’s ratings are unavailable, but its review count and recent feedback favor RoomRaccoon. For small hotels seeking proven satisfaction, RoomRaccoon’s ratings are a decisive advantage. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
HUGO’s pricing details are not publicly available, suggesting a custom or undisclosed quote. RoomRaccoon charges a flat $1,000 initial fee, plus no ongoing monthly or per-room charges, making its costs transparent.
While RoomRaccoon’s upfront fee may seem high, it includes a comprehensive package of features, automation, and integrations. The absence of clear pricing for HUGO complicates a direct cost comparison but leans toward RoomRaccoon’s clarity.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The fundamental difference lies in scope and proven user satisfaction. RoomRaccoon is a feature-rich, well-reviewed platform suitable for small hotels seeking automation and growth tools, while HUGO’s limited feedback makes it hard to recommend confidently.
If your hotel values reliability, extensive features, and ongoing support, RoomRaccoon is the safer choice. Its high ratings, recent positive reviews, and broad integrations show it can truly support your hotel’s operational needs.
However, if simplicity is your priority and you’re willing to accept limited features and support, HUGO might work. Yet, given the current data, RoomRaccoon’s advantages are compelling enough to make it the clearer, more trustworthy option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, HUGO and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. HUGO and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. HUGO offers 7 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 3.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
HUGO: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. HUGO Hotelsoftware GmbH has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor