The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 31 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
TigerTMS shines .
INTELITY shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.3/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile Friendly and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 31 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 31 |
After analyzing 31 verified reviews, TigerTMS users most value its , while INTELITY users highlight guest experience and satisfaction, implementation and training, in-room tablets. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Guest experience and satisfaction
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation and training
▾
|
|
|
+
In-room tablets
▾
|
|
|
+
Mobile key and check-in
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
GEMS functionality
▾
|
|
|
−
Tablet durability issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Staff Collaboration Tools vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #8 5 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 19 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #17 2 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #10 4 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 18 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #11 14 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | — | #19 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #18 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #9 23 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #11 5 reviews |
Both iCharge by TigerTMS and INTELITY GEMS aim to streamline hotel staff collaboration and improve operational flow. While iCharge primarily focuses on integrating front and back office systems for real-time analytics and communication management, INTELITY GEMS offers a broader suite for guest service, content management, and internal workflows. Which solution will better serve your hotel’s specific needs?
If your hotel requires deep integration with existing hotel systems and real-time data reporting, iCharge might seem appealing. However, INTELITY GEMS is more comprehensive for operations and guest engagement, especially with its extensive feature set. So, which one should you prioritize?
iCharge by TigerTMS specializes in connecting hotel systems—such as PMS, PBX, Voicemail, and HSIA—delivering detailed analytics and reports that help optimize operational efficiency. In contrast, INTELITY GEMS provides a centralized platform for staff collaboration, guest requests, digital content, and real-time task management, focusing on guest satisfaction and staff productivity.
Though iCharge is praised for its integration capabilities and real-time reporting, it lacks the extensive features and recent reviews that make INTELITY GEMS more relevant today. Are you looking for a solution that enhances communication and service delivery at every touchpoint? If so, INTELITY is the superior choice.
If your hotel’s primary need is integrating existing systems like PMS, PBX, or call accounting, and generating detailed operational reports, go with iCharge. Its data analytics and system integration make it ideal for operations-focused properties.
If you need a full-suite staff collaboration platform that improves guest service, content management, and internal workflows, choose INTELITY GEMS. Its 52 features, recent high ratings, and focus on guest experience make it better suited for hotels prioritizing service excellence and operational transparency.
For hotels that want a straightforward, system-centric solution, iCharge is the way to go. For those seeking a broader, guest-facing, and staff-centric platform, INTELITY GEMS wins.
INTELITY GEMS boasts a 4.6/5 ease-of-use rating, with users praising its intuitive interface and smooth onboarding process. Reviewers mention that staff find the platform straightforward, especially with mobile-friendly access and clear dashboards.
iCharge, on the other hand, has a 0/5 rating for ease of use, with no recent reviews to support positive feedback. Its interface and user experience are less documented, and the absence of recent reviews indicates limited current usability.
Edge: INTELITY GEMS.
iCharge offers no unique features on its own, focusing mainly on integrating existing hotel systems for reporting and communication. In contrast, INTELITY GEMS provides 52 features, including analytics dashboards, guest messaging, digital menus, mobile check-in, in-room controls, POS integration, and more.
INTELITY’s feature set surpasses iCharge in scope, especially with tools that directly impact guest experience and staff workflows. Its extensive functionalities support both operations and guest engagement effectively.
Edge: INTELITY GEMS.
INTELITY GEMS’s recent reviews highlight a 4.7/5 customer support rating, with users appreciating prompt responses and helpful onboarding. Clients note that support staff are responsive, and implementation assistance is solid, reducing onboarding time.
iCharge, however, has no recent reviews or ratings available, making it hard to assess support quality. Its limited review presence suggests it may not currently prioritize customer support or lacks recent user feedback.
Edge: INTELITY GEMS.
INTELITY boasts 56 verified partners, nearly double TigerTMS’s 28, including key integrations with PMS, POS, and hotel control systems. Its integrations are deep, covering platforms like Infor, Oracle, Mews, and more, supporting multi-property environments.
iCharge’s 28 verified partners include some notable systems but lack the breadth and recent expansion seen with INTELITY. If seamless system integration is critical, INTELITY offers more options and flexibility.
Edge: INTELITY GEMS.
Since iCharge has no recent reviews or ratings, and its review count is zero, it cannot be confidently rated by hoteliers. INTELITY GEMS, with 25 reviews in the last six months and a 4.67/5 rating, demonstrates strong, current user satisfaction.
Hotels across various segments, including resorts and boutique hotels, rate INTELITY highly, especially for its ease of use and support. Its recent reviews affirm its relevance and effectiveness.
Edge: INTELITY GEMS.
Both products do not publish transparent pricing or trial information. Typically, these enterprise solutions are priced on a custom basis, depending on hotel size and desired features.
Given the lack of published prices, your best move is to request quotes from vendors directly to compare value based on your hotel’s specific requirements.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive guest-facing features, digital content, or staff collaboration tools.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with minimal guest interaction or prefers a system-only focus without guest-facing features.
The core difference lies in scope. iCharge is best suited for properties that need system integration and operational analytics, while INTELITY GEMS offers a broad platform that covers operations, guest engagement, and staff collaboration.
Choose iCharge if your hotel’s primary goal is connecting existing systems and optimizing backend workflows through analytics. It is ideal for large hotels with complex infrastructure that values detailed reports.
Opt for INTELITY GEMS if you want a comprehensive guest service platform combined with staff management tools. Its recent reviews, extensive feature set, and high satisfaction ratings make it the stronger choice for hotels that prioritize guest experience and operational transparency.
For hotels seeking a deeply integrated, data-driven system, iCharge offers a solid foundation. But if your focus is on elevating guest satisfaction, streamlining service, and empowering your staff, INTELITY GEMS is the more suitable option.
According to HTR's product database, iCharge (by Tiger TMS) and INTELITY Guest Experience Management System (GEMS) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Facebook Messenger Integration | ||
| Message Routing | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Mobile Friendly | ||
| SMS text messaging |
Showing top differences. 40 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 2 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We are committed to providing exceptional services to our guests which includes offering an enhanced digital experience through INTELITY."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Terranea Resort is dedicated to providing superior guest service and is committed to exploring new ways to enhance our amenities and create an environment of ultimate luxury and co..."
What hoteliers love
Intelity significantly improves guest experience through its innovative tech solutions, including mobile apps and in-room tablets, leading to higher g... Intelity significantly improves guest experience through its innovative tech solutions, including mobile apps and in-room tablets, leading to higher guest satisfaction.
Intelity’s support during the implementation phase is well-regarded, though some users experienced initial challenges that needed repeated training se... Intelity’s support during the implementation phase is well-regarded, though some users experienced initial challenges that needed repeated training sessions.
The in-room tablets are praised for replacing printed materials, allowing guest interactions with multiple hotel services, and promoting sustainabilit... The in-room tablets are praised for replacing printed materials, allowing guest interactions with multiple hotel services, and promoting sustainability. However, issues such as durability and battery life have been noted.
Where hoteliers push back
Users appreciate Intelity's GEMS for its robust backend capabilities, including team management and operational efficiency. However, some have pointed... Users appreciate Intelity's GEMS for its robust backend capabilities, including team management and operational efficiency. However, some have pointed out the need for more user-friendly interfaces and additional features for tasks like user management and SMS platforms.
Durability issues with tablets have been noted, particularly related to battery life and hardware quality. Users express a need for more robust device... Durability issues with tablets have been noted, particularly related to battery life and hardware quality. Users express a need for more robust devices.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. iCharge (by Tiger TMS) and INTELITY Guest Experience Management System (GEMS) share many core Staff Collaboration Tools features, but each has unique capabilities. iCharge (by Tiger TMS) offers 28 verified integration partners, while INTELITY Guest Experience Management System (GEMS) offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. INTELITY Guest Experience Management System (GEMS) leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
iCharge (by Tiger TMS): No. INTELITY Guest Experience Management System (GEMS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Staff Collaboration Tools vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. TigerTMS has an HT Score of 0 and INTELITY has 25. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor