The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
Jaras shines , with exclusive features like Guest Messaging and Payment Requests.
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Jaras users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Jaras hinges on understanding their core strengths and limitations. Both aim to streamline hotel operations, but their approaches and maturity levels differ significantly. Infor HMS offers a well-established, feature-rich platform with a broad global footprint, while Jaras provides a modern, integrated solution geared toward automation and distribution. Your decision depends on your hotel’s size, complexity, and operational priorities.
Both products address the need for centralized management, but Infor's extensive integrations and longstanding reputation contrast with Jaras's newer, highly automated platform. So, which aligns better with your property’s current needs and future growth plans?
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS designed to support a wide variety of hotel types, particularly those seeking deep customization and extensive integrations. Jaras, meanwhile, is a newer, all-in-one platform focused on automation, real-time updates, and distribution efficiency.
Infor’s broad feature set includes guest profiles, CRM, multi-currency, payment processing, and automated night audit, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties. Jaras emphasizes unified reservation management, OTA connectivity, and operational automation, favoring properties that want to streamline distribution and day-to-day tasks quickly.
The core problem both solve is operational complexity, but Infor's long history means it’s more proven for sophisticated needs. Jaras’s modern architecture offers rapid deployment and simplified workflows. Which approach fits your hotel’s maturity and operational style?
If your hotel needs a flexible, highly customizable system with proven integrations and support for complex operations, Infor HMS is the safer choice. Its broad regional presence, 113 verified partners, and multiple hotel segment users make it suitable for established hotels seeking tailored solutions.
Conversely, if your focus is on automation, real-time updates, and expanding online distribution efficiently, Jaras’s single-dashboard approach, with over 150 OTA integrations, is compelling. However, its limited review data and recent market entry mean it’s better suited for properties ready to embrace a newer platform and willing to navigate less tested support.
For hotels prioritizing deep customization and extensive support, go with Infor. If your goal is rapid deployment, automation, and channel management, Jaras might be a good fit.
Infor HMS scores 3.88/5 for ease of use, with reviews praising its navigability after familiarization but criticizing its interface aesthetics and update-related glitches. Many users mention that onboarding takes effort but is ultimately manageable with support.
Jaras, with no available user ratings or reviews, remains unassessed on usability. Given its recent market entry and lack of review data, it’s unclear how intuitive or user-friendly it is for everyday hotel staff.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its established user base provides clearer insights into usability, making it the safer bet for teams needing a familiar, if slightly complex, interface.
Infor offers 11 shared features plus 9 exclusive to it, including guest profiles, CRM, mobile app, multi-currency, payment processing, ancillary revenue tracking, custom rates, group functionality, and automated night audit. These features support detailed customization and operational control.
Jaras provides 5 unique features, such as digital registration, guest messaging, base pricing, real-time status updates, and payment requests, emphasizing automation and distribution. However, with no verified user reviews, the practical effectiveness of these features remains unconfirmed.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its larger feature set, proven implementation, and dedicated modules give it a clear advantage for hotels needing comprehensive management capabilities.
Infor scores 4.04/5 for support, with reviews highlighting responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful onboarding assistance. Users appreciate prompt issue resolution and support during system evolution.
Jaras has no review data available on support quality, making it impossible to assess. Given its recent market entry, support experience may vary and lacks the validation of Infor’s established reputation.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its verified, positive support feedback makes it the more reliable choice for hotels valuing service and assistance.
Infor boasts 113 verified partner integrations, including major players like Booking.com, Expedia, and others, allowing seamless connectivity with booking, revenue, and operational systems.
Jaras does not list verified integrations, though it connects with over 150 OTA channels directly. Its platform’s newer status implies potential expansion, but currently, the integration ecosystem is less mature.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its extensive, verified integration network provides reassurance for hotels needing reliable, proven connectivity.
Infor’s 46 reviews in the last six months reveal a 4.04/5 overall rating, with a 74% likelihood to recommend, especially among boutique hotels and independent properties. Recent reviews praise its customization, mobile capabilities, and support.
Jaras has no recent reviews or user ratings, making it impossible to gauge hotel satisfaction or property segment preferences.
Edge: Infor HMS. Its recent, volume-backed ratings affirm its standing among hoteliers.
Infor does not publicly list pricing, possibly reflecting tiered or bespoke quotes based on hotel size and needs. Its model typically involves licensing and support fees, common for enterprise PMS solutions.
Jaras charges a straightforward $1,000 monthly base fee, with no mention of additional costs or per-room fees. Being newer, its pricing may appeal to smaller properties or those looking for predictable costs.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Infor, budget-conscious hotels should lean toward Jaras for initial cost clarity.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, budget-limited, or prefers a simple, digital-first platform without extensive customization.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive customization, proven integrations, or relies on a mature support network.
Infor HMS offers a mature, feature-rich platform with proven integrations and a solid support reputation, making it ideal for larger or complex hotels. Its extensive regional presence and customizable modules suit properties prioritizing flexibility and operational control.
Jaras presents a promising, automation-centered platform tailored for properties focused on distribution, real-time updates, and operational efficiency. Its newer status and limited review data suggest it’s best for hotels ready to innovate and willing to navigate potential support uncertainties.
In summary, if your hotel values proven stability and extensive features, Infor is the clear choice. If you prefer a modern, automated solution with straightforward pricing and distribution focus, Jaras is worth exploring further.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Jaras share 11 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Real-Time Status Updates |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Jaras share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Jaras offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Jaras: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Jaras has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor