The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 77 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
MISTER BOOKING shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 77 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 30 |
After analyzing 77 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while MISTER BOOKING users highlight support quality, customizable features, ergonomics and design. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
Support quality
▾
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
+
Customizable features
▾
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
+
Ergonomics and design
▾
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
+
Operational efficiency
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
−
Report generation
▾
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
−
Booking engine
▾
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
−
Connectivity issues
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | #33 14 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | #45 4 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | #40 10 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | #35 7 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | #46 3 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | #19 25 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | #36 1 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and guest satisfaction. Infor HMS and Misterbooking both aim to streamline hotel management, but their core strengths and user experiences differ significantly. While Infor offers a broad suite designed for larger, complex properties, Misterbooking caters to independent hotels and chains seeking a flexible, integrated solution. What are the key differences that will influence your decision?
Both Infor HMS and Misterbooking aim to automate and simplify hotel operations, but they diverge in their approach and target market. Infor’s platform focuses on extensive customization, deep integrations, and operational control, making it suitable for properties with complex workflows. Conversely, Misterbooking emphasizes ease of use, affordability, and seamless connectivity with OTA channels, appealing to independent hotels and small chains.
Infor boasts a comprehensive feature set, including guest profiles, CRM, mobile app access, and automated night audits—features that support large, multi-property complexes. Misterbooking offers a robust booking engine, channel manager, payment automation, and guest messaging, often preferred by smaller or boutique hotels. Which platform aligns better with your property’s scale and complexity? The choice hinges on whether you need extensive customization or intuitive simplicity.
If your hotel operates at a larger scale or has complex operational needs, Infor HMS is the better fit. It’s ideal for hotels that require extensive reporting, on-premise deployment, and detailed customization—especially given its 46 reviews and a solid 4.04/5 overall rating, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability and scalability.
In contrast, if your hotel is an independent property or boutique, Misterbooking is the clear winner. With 29 reviews and a higher 4.78/5 rating, it’s celebrated for its user-friendly interface, strong support, and integrated features like booking engine and channel management. For properties prioritizing ease of operation and direct booking growth, Misterbooking offers more targeted benefits.
Misterbooking scores a 4.71/5 for ease of use, with reviews emphasizing its intuitive interface, streamlined workflow, and quick onboarding—"the implementation was very fast and linked to several OTA" highlights user satisfaction. Its modern design and clear navigation make staff adoption straightforward, even for smaller teams.
Infor HMS, with a 3.88/5 rating, is considered functional but less user-friendly. Users note that while navigation is generally manageable, the interface can feel outdated, and some find onboarding more challenging. Support responsiveness is praised, but overall, staff may need more time to master Infor’s extensive features.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Infor offers five features exclusive to its platform, including guest profiles, CRM, mobile app, on-premise deployment, and automated night audit—each supporting complex, multi-property operations. Meanwhile, Misterbooking provides 18 unique features like channel manager, booking engine, transactional emails, guest messaging, online check-in, real-time reporting, shift planning, and rate management.
Both platforms share 15 features, but Misterbooking’s broader feature scope—especially in online distribution, guest communication, and automation—gives it a distinct advantage for hotels seeking a comprehensive, all-in-one management solution.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Infor’s support team receives positive remarks for responsiveness and professionalism, with a rating of 4.04/5. Hoteliers appreciate prompt assistance, especially during onboarding and troubleshooting. One review highlights, "Great support during setup and ongoing issues," emphasizing reliability.
Misterbooking surpasses with a 4.79/5 support rating, with users describing their support as "very helpful and easy to work with." They value quick resolutions and accessible communication, leading to higher overall satisfaction and fewer operational disruptions.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Infor boasts 113 verified partners, including major players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and Oaky by Plusgrade. This extensive network allows deep integration with booking engines, revenue tools, and housekeeping systems, providing larger properties with broad customization options.
Misterbooking has 26 verified integrations, primarily focusing on OTA channels, payment gateways, and management software. Shared partners like SiteMinder and RoomChecking facilitate essential connectivity, but Infor’s wider ecosystem is better suited for properties requiring extensive third-party integration.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Misterbooking’s review score of 4.78/5 is higher than Infor HMS’s 4.04/5, supported by more recent reviews. Hoteliers in boutique and independent segments consistently praise Misterbooking’s ease of use, support, and value, with comments like “very flexible and helpful,” and “easy to manage even multiple properties.”
Infor’s ratings are slightly lower, with some users citing frequent bugs during updates and complex navigation, especially for larger properties. Recent feedback indicates that Misterbooking’s higher rating and recent reviews make it the more trusted solution today.
Edge: Misterbooking.
Pricing details for both products are not publicly disclosed and are typically quote-based, reflecting their enterprise and customized nature. Infor’s platform often involves scalable licensing, with potential implementation costs, while Misterbooking’s pricing is designed to be competitive for small to mid-sized hotels.
Given the lack of public pricing data, your best approach is to request tailored quotes based on your property’s size and requirements. Generally, Misterbooking’s value proposition leans toward affordability and transparency for smaller operations.
Not ideal if your hotel is small, boutique, or prefers quick onboarding without extensive customization. Infor’s depth may be overwhelming for simple or independent properties.
Not ideal if your hotel requires complex multi-property management, deep integrations, or on-premise solutions. Misterbooking’s focus is on simplicity and affordability.
The core difference is their target market: Infor offers a highly customizable, enterprise-level system suited for larger, complex properties, while Misterbooking provides an intuitive, cost-effective solution for small to mid-sized hotels. If your hotel needs extensive integration, automation, and multi-property management, Infor is the more capable choice.
Choose Infor if your property demands deep customization, detailed reporting, and scalability—especially if you are in high-end segments or operate multiple locations. Opt for Misterbooking if your goal is to improve operational efficiency quickly, at an affordable price, with minimal complexity and high support quality.
For smaller, independent hotels prioritizing ease of use and guest engagement, Misterbooking is the recommended platform. Larger properties or chains requiring extensive features and integrations will benefit more from Infor’s comprehensive suite.
In conclusion, if recent reviews and user satisfaction are your guide, Misterbooking’s higher ratings, recent positive feedback, and broader usability make it the more reliable choice today. However, for complex, multi-property operations, Infor remains the robust, scalable option.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|---|
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Misterbooking (PMS) share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 11 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The support team’s responsiveness and effectiveness are repeatedly highlighted. Whether through phone or other means, their availability and ability t... The support team’s responsiveness and effectiveness are repeatedly highlighted. Whether through phone or other means, their availability and ability to address issues quickly is a major plus for users.
Users value the ability to customize their accounts to suit specific needs. This flexibility makes Misterbooking well-adapted for diverse hotel operat... Users value the ability to customize their accounts to suit specific needs. This flexibility makes Misterbooking well-adapted for diverse hotel operations and enhances user satisfaction.
While the software is functional and efficient, users note that the design and ergonomics could use improvements. Recommendations include making the l... While the software is functional and efficient, users note that the design and ergonomics could use improvements. Recommendations include making the layout more user-friendly and modernizing some outdated pages.
Where hoteliers push back
The need for more efficient and detailed statistical tools or reports is mentioned. Users feel that refining these features could lead to better opera... The need for more efficient and detailed statistical tools or reports is mentioned. Users feel that refining these features could lead to better operational insights and decision-making.
There are some criticisms regarding the booking engine, such as insufficient photo uploading options and restriction management. Users suggest that en... There are some criticisms regarding the booking engine, such as insufficient photo uploading options and restriction management. Users suggest that enhancements in these areas could further improve the system.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Misterbooking (PMS) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Misterbooking (PMS) offers 26. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Misterbooking (PMS) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 3.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Misterbooking (PMS): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and MISTER BOOKING has 14. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor