The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles.
Octorate shines , with exclusive features like Performance Reporting and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while Octorate users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | #78 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | #72 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | #41 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | #66 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | #71 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | #44 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | #51 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing between Infor HMS and Octorate hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, budget, and growth plans. While both aim to streamline property management, their core strengths and weaknesses differ markedly. Infor offers a more established, review-backed solution with a broad feature set, whereas Octorate provides a more affordable, highly integrated platform with a focus on multi-channel and automation features.
Both products address fundamental PMS functions like reservations, housekeeping, and guest communication, but they diverge on customization, integrations, and target markets. Are you prioritizing a mature, flexible system supported by many recent reviews? Or are you looking for a cost-effective, all-in-one platform with deep channel and automation features?
With 46 reviews and a high overall rating of 4.04/5, Infor HMS has more recent, positive feedback than Octorate, which has no reviews. Its strong user support, ease of use, and customizable features appeal to mid-sized and larger hotels seeking operational efficiency. Octorate’s limited review presence makes it difficult to assess, but its broad feature count and integrations suggest potential value for smaller or digitally mature properties willing to invest.
The decision largely depends on your hotel’s size and complexity: if you need a mature, proven system with robust support, Infor is better. For a more budget-conscious, integrated ecosystem, Octorate may be enticing, but the lack of recent reviews weakens its case.
Infor HMS is designed to serve hotels that need a comprehensive, scalable property management system with high customization capabilities and proven reliability. If your hotel operates in North America, Europe, or Asia Pacific, and values detailed reporting, integrated revenue management, and proven support, Infor fits well.
Octorate’s platform caters to smaller hotels, hostels, B&Bs, and vacation rentals that prioritize multi-channel management, automation, and ease of use. Its native channel integrations and virtual concierge appeal to properties wanting to streamline guest communication and online presence. However, with no reviews and limited regional presence, Octorate’s suitability remains speculative.
In summary, choose Infor if you require a mature, customizable PMS with extensive integrations and support. Opt for Octorate if your focus is multi-channel distribution, automation, and affordability—though the absence of recent user feedback makes its reliability less certain.
Infor HMS boasts an ease of use rating of 3.88/5 based on 46 reviews, with users highlighting its intuitive navigation once familiar with its format. Support during onboarding is generally praised, although some find the user interface less aesthetically appealing and somewhat technical to new staff.
Octorate has no published user ratings or reviews, making it impossible to assess its usability. However, its emphasis on an all-in-one dashboard and native mobile app suggests a user-friendly design tailored for ease of access.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS offers 19 shared features with Octorate and one unique feature: guest profiles. Its standout features include customizable reporting, reservations, housekeeping, and revenue management modules. While its feature set is comprehensive, it lacks many advanced automation and channel management options found in Octorate.
Octorate boasts 50 features, including open API, analytics dashboards, metasearch connectivity, digital registration, guest messaging, and a built-in channel manager. Its automation, multi-property management, and dynamic pricing tools are significantly more extensive.
Edge: Octorate.
Infor HMS enjoys a support rating of 4.04/5, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness, professionalism, and helpful onboarding. Many users appreciate the quick guidance during issues, though some mention support delays during system updates.
Octorate has no publicly available reviews or ratings, making it impossible to evaluate support quality. Given its smaller size and less established presence, support might be less predictable.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS integrates with 113 verified partners, including major hotel technology providers like Booking.com, Expedia, and Cendyn. This extensive network reduces manual work and enhances operational flow.
Octorate offers integrations with 28 verified partners, including key OTAs and payment solutions, and maintains certifications with top OTAs like Booking.com, Expedia, and Airbnb. While fewer in number, these integrations are deep and reliable.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS has a strong review count of 46 with an overall rating of 4.04/5. Recent reviews highlight its customization and support, especially among boutique and independent hotels in Europe and North America. Larger hotels and chains appreciate its scalability.
Octorate has no reviews, so no ratings or feedback are available. This makes it impossible to gauge user satisfaction or segment-specific preferences.
Edge: Infor HMS.
Infor HMS does not publicly list pricing, which suggests custom quotes based on hotel size and needs. It is likely positioned as a premium solution, reflecting its enterprise features and support.
Octorate costs $1,100 per month, with no lock-in and a 30-day trial. Its transparent pricing appeals to smaller properties or those seeking a predictable, lower-cost solution.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
Core difference: Infor HMS is an enterprise-ready, flexible PMS supported by a broad user base and recent reviews, while Octorate is a feature-rich, lower-cost platform optimized for multi-channel management and automation, but with no recent reviews.
When to pick Infor: If your hotel needs a scalable, customizable system with proven support, extensive integrations, and regional presence, Infor is the safer choice. It’s especially suitable for larger properties or chains that require detailed reporting and operational flexibility.
When to choose Octorate: If your hotel is small to mid-sized, values integrated channel management, automation, and a straightforward pricing model, Octorate could fit. However, the lack of recent reviews and limited regional footprint reduce confidence in its reliability.
Final verdict: For most hotels evaluating a PMS today, Infor HMS stands out as the more reliable, well-rated, and supported option. Octorate offers interesting features but is less proven and harder to assess without recent user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Octorate (Property Management System) share 19 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Custom dashboards | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Multi-property Management | ||
| Open API | ||
| Vacation Rental Rate Intelligence |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Octorate (Property Management System) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Octorate (Property Management System) offers 28. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Octorate (Property Management System): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and Octorate has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor