The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 47 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Guest CRM.
PREVIO shines , with exclusive features like Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) and Guest Communication (SMS Messaging).
Side-by-side ratings based on 47 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 0 |
After analyzing 47 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while PREVIO users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #24 2 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #28 1 reviews | — |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) is critical for your hotel's operational efficiency and guest experience. Both Infor HMS and Previo aim to modernize your management processes, but they do so with different strengths. Infor has a long-standing presence, a broad feature set, and extensive global reach, whereas Previo offers an all-in-one cloud solution with a focus on the Central and Eastern Europe (CEE) region. Your choice depends on your hotel’s size, location, and specific needs.
Both products aim to streamline hotel operations, but Infor HMS boasts a more established market presence and a larger user base. Previo, though less widespread, markets itself as a comprehensive platform for hotels seeking centralized management in a regional context. Which product aligns better with your priorities: global scalability or regional specialization?
Infor HMS primarily targets mid-sized to large hotels looking for a flexible, scalable PMS with robust integrations and customizations. It offers a broad feature set including revenue management, automated night audits, and guest CRM, designed to support complex operations. However, some users report frequent server outages and bugs following updates, which can hinder daily operations.
Previo, by contrast, is positioned as an all-in-one cloud system with integrated modules such as booking engine, channel manager, and housekeeping, tailored for hotels in the CEE region. It lacks the extensive review footprint of Infor but emphasizes ease of central management and automation within its regional market. If your hotel needs a highly customizable, globally supported system, Infor is likely the better choice. If regional management and integrated tools are your priority, Previo might serve you well.
The key difference: Infor’s strength lies in its broad, flexible suite and international support, while Previo emphasizes regional focus and integrated features for streamlined management. Which approach aligns with your hotel’s growth plans and operational scope?
If your hotel operates in multiple regions or has complex operational needs, go with Infor HMS. Its extensive integration network (over 113 verified partners), customizable reporting, and scalability make it suitable for large or multi-property groups. It’s especially valuable if your team prioritizes automation, revenue management, or detailed guest profiling.
If your hotel is primarily based in the CEE region and seeks an all-in-one platform with built-in booking, channel management, and guest engagement tools, Previo is the better fit. Its native modules reduce third-party dependencies, and its straightforward cloud-based approach simplifies daily management. It’s ideal for hotels seeking regional efficiency and a unified system without heavy customization needs.
In short, choose Infor if your hotel leans toward complex, multi-property operations with a global footprint. Opt for Previo if your focus is on regional management and integrated, easy-to-use tools.
Infor HMS has a moderate ease-of-use rating of 3.88/5 and is generally considered navigable once familiar with its format. Users mention that the system is "easy to navigate" after onboarding, and its mobile app adds operational flexibility. However, some report that the interface isn't particularly attractive, and frequent updates can cause disruptions.
Previo’s ease of use isn’t explicitly rated but is implied to be straightforward, especially because it offers an all-in-one platform with integrated modules. Its cloud-based design simplifies onboarding, especially for hotels in the CEE region, and the integrated nature reduces the learning curve associated with multiple systems.
Edge: Infor HMS, due to its higher review volume and more detailed usability feedback.
Infor offers 10 shared features with Previo but shines with 10 unique capabilities like guest profiles, cloud support, revenue management, automated night audits, and payment processing. These functionalities support complex revenue strategies and operational automation suited for larger hotels.
Previo, however, provides 21 features, including a native booking engine, channel manager, task management, online check-in/out, integrated ID scanner, GDPR compliance, and PCI support. Its comprehensive module set aims to centralize all hotel management tasks with minimal third-party integrations needed.
Edge: Previo, with more features tailored to operational centralization and automation.
Infor’s support scores a solid 4.04/5, with reviews praising its responsiveness and professionalism. Hoteliers highlight that support staff are "kind," "helpful," and quick to respond, which is crucial during system issues or upgrades.
Previo’s support data isn’t detailed, but given its smaller user base and regional focus, support may be less extensive. However, in its target markets, support is often localized and responsive, especially within the CEE region.
Edge: Infor HMS, due to its higher support rating and extensive review history.
Infor boasts 113 verified partner integrations, including major industry names like Booking.com, Expedia, and Onity. These integrations support automation and reduce manual work, especially beneficial for larger or multi-channel hotels.
Previo has only 7 verified partners, with shared integrations including some notable hospitality providers like HQ Revenue and profit management tools. Its smaller ecosystem limits potential automation but simplifies integration management.
Edge: Infor HMS, thanks to its extensive partner network.
Infor’s overall rating of 4.04/5 comes from 46 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its scalability, customization, and support. Hotels in the independent and boutique segments rate it 4.18/5 and 4.5/5 respectively, indicating strong satisfaction among diverse property types.
Previo lacks recent review data and an overall rating, making it difficult to gauge user sentiment. Its regional focus might mean satisfaction varies based on local support and feature relevance.
Edge: Infor HMS, due to higher review volume and recent positive feedback.
Both products do not publicly disclose detailed pricing, as they typically tailor quotes based on hotel size and needs. Infor HMS’s pricing model is not transparent, but implementation fees and per-room charges are common in large-scale systems.
Previo similarly offers no fixed pricing info, positioning itself as a regional solution likely priced competitively for smaller to mid-sized hotels in CEE. Expect quotes based on features and hotel size rather than flat rates.
Infor HMS is a comprehensive, scalable PMS suited for hotels with complex needs and international operations. Its extensive integration network, customization options, and broad feature set make it ideal for larger, multi-property hotels or chains.
Previo offers a regional, all-in-one cloud solution that simplifies hotel management, particularly in the CEE region. Its integrated modules are perfect for hotels seeking a unified system with automation and minimal third-party dependencies.
Choose Infor if your hotel requires extensive customization, global support, and advanced revenue management. Opt for Previo if regional management, ease of use, and integrated tools are your priorities.
In conclusion, Infor’s larger review footprint and feature breadth make it the more proven choice for most hotels seeking a flexible, scalable PMS. Previo’s targeted regional focus and comprehensive modules appeal to hotels looking for an all-in-one solution within the CEE market.
Final recommendation: For most global or larger hotels, Infor HMS is the better option. For hotels in Central and Eastern Europe prioritizing simplicity and integrated modules, Previo is worth considering.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and Previo share 10 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Transactional Emails (booking, folios, etc) |
Showing top differences. 19 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and Previo share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while Previo offers 7. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Infor HMS leads in ease of use at 3.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. Previo: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and PREVIO has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor