The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 369 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Infor shines when it comes to ease of use .
RMS shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Housekeeping.
Side-by-side ratings based on 369 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 47 | 322 |
After analyzing 369 verified reviews, Infor users most value its ease of use, reporting, integration, while RMS users highlight technical support and learning resources, scalability and feature depth, trust accounting support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
Technical Support and Learning Resources
▾
|
|
+
Reporting
▾
|
+
Scalability and Feature Depth
▾
|
|
+
Integration
▾
|
+
Trust Accounting Support
▾
|
|
+
Housekeeping Module
▾
|
+
Online Channel Management
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support
▾
|
−
Booking Engine and Mobile Interface
▾
|
|
−
Ease of Use
▾
|
−
Report Writer Flexibility
▾
|
|
−
Updating Issues
▾
|
−
POS System Integration
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #44 8 reviews | #7 147 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #25 24 reviews | #8 102 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #19 9 reviews | #8 14 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #24 2 reviews | #7 8 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #28 24 reviews | #11 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #23 26 reviews | #13 57 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #29 8 reviews | #9 50 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #31 6 reviews | #3 65 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #22 20 reviews | #11 63 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #24 17 reviews | #23 20 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #28 1 reviews | #12 10 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | — | #8 7 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel involves balancing features, ease of use, support, and overall value. Infor HMS and RMS are both established options, but they serve different hotel profiles and operational needs. Your decision hinges on understanding their strengths, limitations, and which aligns best with your hotel’s scale and ambitions.
Both products aim to improve operational efficiency and guest experiences, but Infor HMS emphasizes customization and integration, while RMS focuses on simplicity and scalability. So, which one better suits your hotel’s unique context?
Infor HMS and RMS are built around solving core hotel management problems—reservations, guest data, and operational workflows—yet they approach these from different angles. Infor HMS is a comprehensive, cloud-based platform with extensive customization options, suited for hotels needing tailored workflows and deep integration capabilities.
RMS, by contrast, offers a more streamlined interface with a focus on ease of use, rapid onboarding, and automation, appealing to properties that prioritize simplicity and quick deployment. Both systems aim to optimize operations, but the choice depends on whether your hotel needs deep customization (Infor) or rapid, straightforward management (RMS).
The divergence is clear: does your team prefer a highly customizable, feature-rich system or a more accessible, user-friendly platform? Which aligns with your operational complexity and growth plans?
If your hotel operates in a highly competitive, complex environment where customization and integrations are critical—such as luxury or boutique properties—Infor HMS is the better choice. Its ability to be tailored and integrated with numerous partners suits hotels with advanced operational needs and a focus on personalized guest experiences.
Conversely, if your hotel needs a system that’s quick to implement, easy to train staff on, and capable of scaling efficiently—like motels, RV parks, or smaller hotels—RMS is the pragmatic pick. Its user-friendly design and proven scalability make it ideal for properties looking to streamline operations without extensive IT overhead.
For hotels seeking advanced reporting, extensive integrations, and flexible workflows, Infor HMS provides an edge. For those prioritizing speed, simplicity, and responsive support, RMS is the more suitable platform.
Based on recent reviews, RMS outperforms Infor HMS in ease of use, with a score of 4.28/5 versus 3.88/5. RMS’s interface is celebrated for its clarity, with users describing it as “very user-friendly,” and onboarding is rated at 4.12/5, compared to Infor’s 3.64/5. RMS also benefits from more recent reviews—20 from the last six months—indicating ongoing product refinement and strong support responsiveness.
Meanwhile, Infor HMS users mention that once familiar, navigation is straightforward, but initial onboarding can be sluggish, and some find the interface “not pretty” or less intuitive. Frequent server issues and bugs during updates also complicate usability.
Edge: RMS, especially for teams that need quick adoption and ongoing ease of use.
RMS boasts a broader feature set, with 54 exclusive features—including integrated CRS, booking engine, guest CRM, multi-lingual support, POS, digital registration, and guest messaging—compared to Infor’s zero unique features. This extensive suite facilitates end-to-end management, from online booking to guest communications.
Infor HMS offers core property management functionalities with 20 shared features but lacks the expansive add-ons of RMS. Its strengths lie in integration with operational systems and customizable reporting, yet it doesn’t match RMS’s breadth.
Edge: RMS, for its richer, more varied feature options tailored to diverse hotel needs.
RMS’s support ratings are higher, with a 4.48/5 score and recent reviews praising its “proactive,” “helpful,” and “friendly” service. Users cite quick response times, knowledgeable staff, and effective issue resolution, especially in complex or urgent situations.
Infor HMS support is rated at 4.04/5, with some reviews noting prompt responses, but others highlight issues with bugs and system updates causing disruptions. Support appears reliable but less consistently praised than RMS.
Edge: RMS, for its more recent, highly rated customer service and support team responsiveness.
In terms of verified partners, both systems are comparable, with Infor offering 113 partners and RMS 112. Shared integrations include major players like Fairmas, Unifocus, and IVvy. Infor has exclusive integrations with Priority Software, Omnibees, and Zaplox, while RMS offers unique partners like Criton, Sage, and FLYR Hospitality.
The similar partner counts suggest both are well-connected, but RMS’s slightly broader ecosystem—plus its dedicated POS and guest portal integrations—may provide more seamless operational flow for properties with complex tech environments.
Edge: RMS, for its slightly larger and more diverse integration ecosystem.
RMS receives a higher overall rating of 4.56/5 from 293 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use and support, especially among mid-market and budget hotels. Its NPS score of 8.51 confirms strong customer loyalty.
Infor, with 46 reviews and a score of 4.04/5, is less favored overall, with many recent comments pointing to stability issues and a desire for a more modern interface. The volume of recent reviews clearly favors RMS’s continued product improvement and customer satisfaction.
Edge: RMS, based on review volume and recent feedback.
Infor HMS does not list a specific price, which is typical for enterprise software—likely requiring a custom quote based on hotel size and requirements. RMS charges $800 monthly per property, with no free tier, but this includes comprehensive features suitable for most mid-size hotels and resorts.
While RMS’s transparent pricing makes budgeting easier, Infor’s custom quotes may be more suitable for large, complex properties with specific needs and budgets.
Hotels that benefit most from Infor HMS:
Not ideal if:
RMS is best suited for:
Not ideal if:
RMS and Infor HMS serve different hotel profiles. Infor’s strength lies in customization, extensive integrations, and detailed operational control, making it ideal for large, complex properties or those with specific workflows. RMS excels in ease of use, rapid onboarding, and a broad feature set, making it perfect for smaller or mid-sized hotels aiming for efficiency.
If your hotel needs a flexible, deep system, Infor HMS delivers the most comprehensive solution. If simplicity, quick deployment, and support matter most, RMS is the clear choice.
In conclusion, RMS’s more recent reviews and higher market presence make it the stronger option for most hotels today, especially if ease of use and ongoing support are top priorities. However, larger hotels with complex needs might benefit from Infor’s customization capabilities despite its steeper learning curve.
This comprehensive comparison should help your team make an informed decision aligned with your hotel’s operational scale and strategic goals.
According to HTR's product database, Infor HMS and RMS share 20 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual |
Showing top differences. 42 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 3 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When you manage 26 properties, speed and control are everything. With RMS, I can update rates, policies, or form letters instantly across the group. That kind of centralization let..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"RMS has helped us strengthen what makes The Nare special: our connection with guests. It gives our team the knowledge they need to offer a genuinely personal experience, and we see..."
What hoteliers love
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed per... Reporting features are frequently highlighted. Users appreciate both standard reports and the ability to create custom reports, aiding in detailed performance tracking. However, some find that the updates disrupt report formats and functionalities.
Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry e... Infor HMS is praised for its seamless integration with booking platforms like Booking.com, HRS, and Expedia. This significantly reduces manual entry errors and improves efficiency in managing reservations.
Where hoteliers push back
Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate... Infor HMS's support team is frequently mentioned for their responsiveness and professionalism, crucial for resolving issues promptly. Users appreciate how support representatives guide them through problem resolutions.
Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking i... Infor HMS is generally considered easy to navigate, with intuitive multi-faceted search options. However, some users find the user interface lacking in aesthetics and feel it could be more intuitive.
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learnin... RMS's support team is frequently praised for its proactive and knowledgeable assistance. However, users have expressed a need for more digital learning resources and video tutorials to aid in system navigation and maximize the utility of available features.
RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalabili... RMS is praised for its ability to support growing businesses, especially RV resorts requiring complex operational support. Users commend the scalability and the rich feature set, including reservation management, reporting, and housekeeping, available out of the box. Such comprehensiveness allows properties to streamline varied operations effectively.
Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates... Users appreciate RMS for its exceptional trust accounting support, citing reliable and speedy assistance with accounting issues. The system's updates enhance its capability to manage property trust accounting efficiently, with many noting that this feature significantly reduces operational complexity, thus allowing property managers to focus on other critical tasks.
Where hoteliers push back
The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the bookin... The booking engine receives mixed reviews, with calls for enhancement in sophistication and mobile friendliness. Suggestions include making the booking process easier and potentially cost-free for returning guests, which could encourage loyalty and repeat business.
While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional... While RMS offers a robust report writing tool, customers have called for more customization options. Suggestions included editable fields and optional columns to allow faster and more flexible report generation, aiding daily decision-making without needing to reconstruct reports from scratch.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Infor HMS and RMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Infor HMS offers 113 verified integration partners, while RMS offers 112. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RMS leads in ease of use at 4.3/5 vs 3.9/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Infor HMS: No. RMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Infor has an HT Score of 22 and RMS has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor