The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 292 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
innRoad shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Jaras shines , with exclusive features like On premise and Payment Requests.
Side-by-side ratings based on 292 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 292 | 0 |
After analyzing 292 verified reviews, innRoad users most value its customer support, reporting and revenue management, booking engine and ota integration, while Jaras users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine and OTA Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Tape Chart
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System Glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Credit Card Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Compatibility and App
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 179 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #16 47 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #13 11 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #12 96 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #15 45 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #16 33 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #13 17 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #3 275 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #34 5 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #39 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #34 0 reviews | — |
Choosing between innRoad by innRoad and Jaras hinges on your property's specific needs. Both systems aim to streamline operations and increase revenue, but their strengths and limitations differ significantly. innRoad has a long-standing reputation with a large user base and extensive features, whereas Jaras is newer, with a focus on automation and extensive OTA integrations. Your decision should align with your hotel’s size, operational complexity, and growth plans.
The critical factor is that innRoad, with its larger review base and recent positive feedback, offers more proven reliability and support. Jaras, although innovative, has yet to establish the same level of trust among hoteliers. Are you ready to prioritize proven track record or the latest automation features?
innRoad is a comprehensive, cloud-based PMS renowned for its user-friendly interface, detailed reporting, and extensive integrations. It caters to a broad spectrum of property types, with a proven track record of increasing direct bookings and revenue. Its 238 reviews with a 4.7/5 overall rating and recent feedback solidify its reputation for stability and support.
Jaras, in contrast, is a newer platform built for scalable automation and distribution, boasting integrations with over 150 OTAs. However, with zero reviews and no recent feedback, its reliability remains untested at scale. Do you prefer an established system with proven results or a fresh platform promising advanced automation?
If your hotel needs a mature PMS with proven support, extensive features, and a strong North American and European presence, innRoad is your clear choice. It’s ideal for properties seeking reliable OTA integration, detailed reporting, and a system that’s been battle-tested across multiple segments, including inns, resorts, and budget hotels.
If your hotel requires a flexible, automation-focused platform with broad distribution channels and financial management tools, Jaras might appeal. But keep in mind, without reviews or case studies, it’s a riskier pick for properties that prioritize stability and proven ROI.
innRoad enjoys a high ease-of-use rating (4.49/5) with a user-friendly interface, mobile accessibility, and positive onboarding experiences noted by hoteliers. Reviewers highlight its intuitive Tape Chart and straightforward reservation management, although some mention occasional glitches and mobile limitations.
Jaras’ UI is untested publicly due to a lack of reviews, but its design aims to combine automation and centralization into a single dashboard. Without user feedback, we cannot confidently assess its usability. For now, edge: innRoad.
innRoad offers over 43 features exclusive to its platform, including a channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, online check-in, and more. Its extensive feature set supports comprehensive property management and revenue growth strategies.
Jaras provides 3 unique features, notably extensive OTA integrations with over 150 channels, automation of housekeeping and maintenance, and financial workflows. However, with fewer total features and no detailed breakdown of functionalities, innRoad's broader suite gives it a clear advantage. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad scores highly for support, with a 4.54/5 rating and 24/7 live assistance. Reviewers praise its prompt, knowledgeable support staff and smooth onboarding, though some mention slow resolution times during system glitches.
Jaras’s support offerings are unreviewed, given the absence of user feedback. Its recent market entry suggests support quality is untested, making innRoad the more reliable choice. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 34 verified integrations, including popular partners like QuickBooks, Revinate, and RateGain, providing extensive connectivity for various operational needs.
Jaras currently has zero verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with third-party systems. For properties relying on diverse integrations, innRoad’s ecosystem is a significant advantage. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s reviews are recent and plentiful, with a 4.7/5 rating from 238 reviews, primarily from hotels in North America and Europe. Hotels of various sizes praise its ease of use, support, and positive revenue impact.
Since Jaras has no reviews or recent feedback, its user rating remains unknown. Without real-world ratings, innRoad clearly leads in trusted user satisfaction. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad is priced at a flat $300 per month without additional fees, making it accessible for small to medium-sized hotels. Its transparent pricing includes the core system, with optional modules, but no specific add-ons are detailed.
Jaras’s fee is higher at $1,000 upfront, with no mention of ongoing monthly costs. As a newer platform, its total cost of ownership and value proposition are less clear. Based on available data, innRoad offers better value for established properties.
innRoad offers a mature, well-supported PMS trusted by thousands of hoteliers. Its extensive feature set, proven support, and large review base make it suitable for a wide range of property types, especially those focusing on increasing direct bookings and operational stability.
Jaras presents a promising newer option emphasizing automation and distribution. However, with no reviews or proven customer satisfaction data, it remains a riskier choice for properties that require certainty and reliability.
If your hotel values proven performance, extensive integrations, and ongoing support, innRoad is the safer, more dependable pick. Choose Jaras only if you’re comfortable being an early adopter and want cutting-edge automation features—just be prepared for a period of adjustment.
According to HTR's product database, innRoad and Jaras share 13 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Group Booking Engine | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Payment Requests | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 34 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, u... While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, users find the 24/7 support invaluable for troubleshooting any issues.
The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dy... The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dynamically adjust room rates and increase profitability. Some users suggest further report customization for more tailored insights.
Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to si... Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to significant revenue boosts for many properties. However, issues were noted with third-party integrations sometimes losing details.
Where hoteliers push back
Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system perf... Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system performing slowly at times. These issues occasionally impact booking and check-in processes.
InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes.... InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes. The inclusion of PCI compliance and secure payment processing is appreciated.
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. innRoad and Jaras share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. innRoad offers 34 verified integration partners, while Jaras offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. innRoad leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
innRoad: No. Jaras: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. innRoad has an HT Score of 31 and Jaras has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor