The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 292 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
innRoad shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.6/5) , with exclusive features like Housekeeping module and Native Email Marketing.
Softstar shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 292 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 292 | 0 |
After analyzing 292 verified reviews, innRoad users most value its customer support, reporting and revenue management, booking engine and ota integration, while Softstar users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Softstar |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
|
+
Reporting and Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
+
Booking Engine and OTA Integration
▾
|
|
|
+
Tape Chart
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System Glitches
▾
|
|
|
−
Credit Card Processing
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Compatibility and App
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #6 179 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #16 47 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #13 11 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #9 5 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #12 96 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #15 45 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #16 33 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #13 17 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #3 275 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #34 5 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #39 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #34 0 reviews | — |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) depends on your hotel’s needs, size, and operational priorities. innRoad by innRoad and Softstar both aim to streamline management, but innRoad’s established presence, extensive feature set, and recent reviews make it a more reliable choice for most hoteliers today. Softstar, while offering advanced automation and AI-driven insights, lacks recent review data, making it harder to judge its current performance. Which product aligns best with your hotel’s goals?
innRoad and Softstar both serve the property management space but differ significantly in maturity and market presence. innRoad is a well-established PMS with over 238 recent reviews in the last six months, scoring 4.7/5 overall, highlighting its popularity and steady performance. Conversely, Softstar has no recent reviews or ratings, which raises questions about its current reliability or market traction.
innRoad offers a comprehensive, feature-rich platform designed for hotels of various sizes, proven by its 56 proprietary features, while Softstar’s capabilities are less transparent, with no detailed feature count available. innRoad’s broad integration ecosystem and regional presence across North America and Europe give it a distinct edge. Are you comfortable with a product that’s well-tested and widely adopted, or are you exploring newer options with limited recent feedback?
If your hotel needs a mature, trusted PMS with proven operational support and extensive integrations, go with innRoad. Its user-friendly interface, 24/7 live support, and robust features like channel management, booking engine, revenue management, and guest communication are ideal for mid-sized to large properties or those seeking a seamless operational tool.
If, however, your hotel is looking for a platform that emphasizes AI-driven insights, automation, and perhaps future scalability with less immediate user feedback, Softstar could be considered. But given the lack of recent reviews or user feedback, innRoad remains the safer choice for hotels that prioritize reliability and proven performance.
innRoad’s ease of use is strongly supported by a 4.49/5 rating and positive reviews praising its intuitive interface, especially its Tape Chart, which simplifies reservation and room management. Users highlight its straightforward navigation and quick onboarding process, though some mention occasional system glitches and mobile compatibility issues.
Softstar’s user experience details are unavailable, and with no recent reviews or ratings, it’s impossible to assess its usability effectively. The absence of feedback suggests it might lack the polish or familiarity that innRoad offers. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad boasts 56 unique features, including multi-currency, multi-lingual support, channel management, booking engine, housekeepings, revenue management, online check-in/out, integrated payments, guest CRM, and mobile apps. These features cater to a broad range of operational needs, making it a comprehensive choice.
Softstar’s feature set is not detailed in the available data, with no specific features listed or compared. Without concrete information, it’s clear innRoad’s feature depth and variety give it a significant advantage. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s support ratings are high, with a 4.54/5 score and numerous reviews praising its 24/7 live customer service. Hoteliers report prompt support and dedicated onboarding, though some mention occasional delays and system glitches.
Softstar’s support details are unavailable, and with no recent reviews to gauge user satisfaction, it’s impossible to determine its support quality. innRoad’s well-documented support record and extensive user feedback favor it. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad is verified with 34 integration partners, including major OTAs, Quickbooks, Revinate, and others, enabling easy connection to various tools. This positions innRoad as a flexible, integrable PMS suitable for diverse operational workflows.
Softstar has no listed verified integrations, which limits its appeal for hotels seeking extensive connectivity. InnRoad’s broader ecosystem of partners makes it the clear choice here. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s recent reviews consistently rate it at 4.7/5, with 238 reviews in the last six months, and an 89% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across segments like independent, boutique, and motels have expressed satisfaction with ease of use, support, and features.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Softstar, making it impossible to determine user satisfaction or loyalty. Given the substantial recent feedback, innRoad holds the higher rating. Edge: innRoad.
innRoad’s pricing starts at $300 per month with no implementation or hidden fees, offering transparent, predictable costs. Pricing for Softstar is not publicly available, which may complicate budgeting and comparison.
Without clear pricing details for Softstar, innRoad’s transparent model makes it easier for your team to evaluate ROI and plan finances confidently.
Not ideal if you’re a very small property seeking a lightweight, simple solution, or if mobile app support is critical, given some user concerns about mobile compatibility.
Not ideal if you prefer well-established, widely supported systems with extensive recent user feedback, or if your hotel’s primary need is comprehensive guest management.
innRoad offers a mature, well-reviewed property management platform trusted by thousands of hoteliers. Its breadth of features, regional presence, and recent positive feedback make it a solid choice for hotels seeking operational efficiency and revenue growth.
Softstar’s AI capabilities and automation features may appeal to innovative teams but lack recent reviews, making it a less certain option today. For reliability, proven performance, and a broad ecosystem, innRoad is the clear leader. Choose innRoad if you prioritize stability, features, and support; consider Softstar only if your hotel’s focus is on advanced automation and you’re comfortable with limited recent user feedback.
According to HTR's product database, innRoad and Softstar share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Softstar |
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Group Booking Engine | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 44 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"In the first year, we had a 100% increase in revenue with innRoad and are about to see big growth in 2022 again. As far as using the product, I love the tape-chart and creating a r..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"My favorite part about innRoad is the great customer support staff that are very responsive and always helps me get any issues resolved in a timely manner."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, u... While generally positive, some reviews mention the need for quicker resolution times and better communication about updates and fixes. Despite this, users find the 24/7 support invaluable for troubleshooting any issues.
The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dy... The reporting features are considered detailed and customizable, aiding in financial tracking and decision-making. Revenue management tools help to dynamically adjust room rates and increase profitability. Some users suggest further report customization for more tailored insights.
Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to si... Users love the seamless integration with OTAs and a responsive booking engine that drives direct bookings and reduces overbookings. This has led to significant revenue boosts for many properties. However, issues were noted with third-party integrations sometimes losing details.
Where hoteliers push back
Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system perf... Users report intermittent glitches with the system, such as the Tape Chart freezing, rate changes not being user-friendly, and the overall system performing slowly at times. These issues occasionally impact booking and check-in processes.
InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes.... InnRoad's integrated credit card processing is a well-received feature, although users note the need for better handling of chargebacks and disputes. The inclusion of PCI compliance and secure payment processing is appreciated.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. innRoad and Softstar share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. innRoad offers 34 verified integration partners, while Softstar offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. innRoad leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
innRoad: No. Softstar: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. innRoad has an HT Score of 31 and Softstar has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor