The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 58 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Instamojo shines .
Zil Money shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Recurring Payments and Mail Order Telephone Order (MOTO) Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 58 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $400/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 58 |
After analyzing 58 verified reviews, Instamojo users most value its , while Zil Money users highlight user-friendly interface, customer experience enhancements, payment processing speed. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Instamojo |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Experience Enhancements
▾
|
|
|
+
Payment Processing Speed
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
|
−
Third-Party Integrations
▾
|
|
|
−
Approval Process
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #3 12 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #3 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #3 15 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 25 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #1 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #3 51 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #3 0 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #2 1 reviews |
Choosing between Instamojo and Zil Money for your hotel’s payments processing boils down to what specific needs you prioritize. Instamojo offers limited features and no recent reviews, but it has a significant presence in certain markets. Zil Money, meanwhile, enjoys a robust recent review profile, high user ratings, and a broad feature set. Your team should consider whether your hotel needs a straightforward solution or a more comprehensive financial platform.
Both products aim to streamline payment processes, but their implementations and target segments differ. Instamojo’s limited features and regional focus contrast sharply with Zil Money’s extensive tools and global reach. Which solution aligns better with your hotel’s operational demands?
Instamojo, with zero reviews and a 0/5 overall rating, provides an extremely limited platform, primarily focused on basic payment processing. It lacks recent customer feedback, making its reliability and usability highly questionable for hotel use. Conversely, Zil Money boasts over 54 reviews, all within the last six months, with a solid 62.92/100 score and an 87% likelihood to recommend, indicating strong recent customer satisfaction.
Where Instamojo's minimal presence makes it unsuitable for most hotels, Zil Money demonstrates clear advantages, especially given its broader feature set and positive recent reviews. The question remains: does your hotel require a reliable, feature-rich financial platform or a basic payment tool?
If your hotel needs a comprehensive financial management platform that supports multiple payment methods, automates recurring payments, and integrates with various accounting software, Zil Money is the clear choice. It’s suited for hotels of all sizes, especially those with complex financial operations or multiple properties.
However, if your hotel only seeks a simple, perhaps one-off payment processing tool without the need for extensive features, Instamojo might suffice—but its lack of recent reviews and features make this a risky, less-informed choice. Given Zil Money’s high ratings and active user base, it’s the more reliable option for ongoing hotel operations.
Instamojo's usability cannot be rated due to a lack of reviews, but given its minimal feature offering, it likely has a simple interface. Zil Money, rated 4.5/5 for ease of use with 54 reviews, is highly regarded for its user-friendly design, quick onboarding, and straightforward navigation. Users report that its platform is intuitive and reduces operational friction.
Edge: Zil Money.
Instamojo offers no unique features or integrations, providing only basic payment processing. Zil Money, on the other hand, offers 15 distinct features, including Pay by Link, Recurring Payments, Multi-Currency Settlements, Contactless Payments, Payment Splitting, and Pre-Authorizations, setting it apart significantly.
Given that Instamojo has zero features, Zil Money’s extensive toolkit makes it the clear winner. Its feature diversity supports more complex hotel payment scenarios and financial workflows.
Edge: Zil Money.
Instamojo’s customer support ratings are nonexistent, and there are no recent reviews to gauge responsiveness. Zil Money’s support is rated 4.5/5 based on 54 reviews, with users praising its responsiveness and helpfulness. Review snippets mention that support is generally quick and effective, although some users desire faster responses.
Considering the review data, Zil Money’s customer support is notably stronger and more reliable. If ongoing support quality matters to your hotel, Zil Money is preferable.
Edge: Zil Money.
Instamojo has only one verified partner (Yanolja Cloud Solution), limiting its integration options. Zil Money has no verified partners currently but supports an API, indicating potential for more integrations in the future. Its extensive feature set suggests it could support wider connectivity if expanded.
Given its current limited integration profile, Instamojo falls short. Zil Money’s open API and broad feature set position it as the more adaptable platform, especially as it grows.
Edge: Zil Money.
Instamojo has zero reviews, so there’s no rating data. Zil Money, with 54 recent reviews, has a 62.92/100 score and an 87% likelihood to recommend. Hotels across various segments, including luxury and city hotels, report high satisfaction, particularly praising ease of use and support.
It’s clear Zil Money dominates in user perception. Its recent review activity and high ratings make it the preferred choice for hoteliers seeking reliable payment management.
Edge: Zil Money.
Instamojo does not specify pricing, but it offers no freemium plan or trial, suggesting opaque or possibly unavailable pricing. Zil Money charges $400 upfront with no mention of ongoing fees, trial, or subscription details. Its pricing model is straightforward, but the cost may be significant for smaller hotels.
Given the lack of transparent pricing for Instamojo and Zil Money’s clear fee structure, your team should evaluate whether the investment aligns with your hotel’s budget and expected value.
Not ideal if your hotel requires ongoing financial management, automation, or multi-currency support.
Not ideal if your hotel operates solely in a local market with minimal transaction volume, or if budget constraints prohibit a $400 setup fee.
At its core, Zil Money is a versatile financial platform with a broad feature set and active recent reviews, making it suitable for hotels with complex payment needs. Instamojo offers a bare-bones solution, lacking recent validation and feature depth, risking operational inefficiencies.
If your hotel needs a reliable, feature-rich payment solution that supports automation, multiple currencies, and integrations, Zil Money is the clear winner. Its high user ratings and recent reviews confirm its suitability for hotel payment management.
However, if your hotel only requires minimal, infrequent payment processing without the need for extensive features, and in a region where Instamojo’s limited presence is acceptable, it might serve your needs—though this is a risky, less-supported choice.
In conclusion, for most hotels aiming for operational efficiency and growth, Zil Money is the safer, more capable investment.
According to HTR's product database, Instamojo and Zil Money share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| Authorization Adjustments | ||
| Gratuity Function | ||
| Multi-Currency Settlements | ||
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Recurring Payments |
Showing top differences. 3 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tas... Users frequently praise Zil Money for its intuitive and straightforward interface that simplifies invoicing, expense tracking, and other financial tasks. The platform’s ease of use reduces the onboarding time and enhances operational efficiency.
Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup... Several reviews indicate that minor improvements in customer experience, such as easing the verification process and reducing the time taken for setup, could make the platform even more efficient and user-friendly.
Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels... Several users highlight the speed and reliability of Zil Money's payment processing feature, which ensures timely transactions and supports the hotels' cash flow management.
Where hoteliers push back
Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations a... Users value Zil Money's ability to integrate seamlessly with various accounting and financial software, which helps consolidate financial operations and enhances efficiency.
Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to var... Expanding integrations with more third-party applications is suggested by users, which would offer more flexibility and customization, catering to varying business needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Instamojo and Zil Money share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Instamojo offers 1 verified integration partners, while Zil Money offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Zil Money leads in ease of use at 4.5/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Instamojo: No. Zil Money: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Instamojo has an HT Score of 0 and Zil Money has 63. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor