The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Instamojo shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, Instamojo users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Instamojo |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
When evaluating payments processing software for your hotel, your primary goal is to find a reliable, easy-to-use solution that boosts operational efficiency and enhances revenue management. Both Instamojo and ROH aim to streamline payment workflows, but they diverge significantly in features, support, and market presence. Instamojo’s lack of recent reviews and zero ratings cast doubt on its current effectiveness, while ROH’s strong recent reviews and high ratings make it a more trustworthy choice.
Your decision ultimately hinges on whether you need a straightforward payment tool or a comprehensive platform that offers automation and integration. Do you want a simple payment interface or a full-fledged financial infrastructure? Let’s explore both options.
Instamojo and ROH are both designed to facilitate hotel payments, but they serve different needs. Instamojo’s offering appears to be minimal, with no documented features, reviews, or recent user feedback, raising questions about its viability. Meanwhile, ROH provides an extensive suite of 19 features, including refund management, payment splitting, recurring payments, and acceptance of multiple card types and digital wallets.
ROH’s recent reviews (10 in the last six months) and high ratings—average 4.97/5 for support and 4.95/5 for ease of use—indicate active, satisfied users. Conversely, Instamojo’s absence of recent reviews and its 0/5 scores in all categories suggest it’s either inactive or not suited for hotel use. Given the data, ROH clearly stands out as the more dependable choice for your hotel.
If your hotel needs a payment system with robust automation, comprehensive features, and proven support, go with ROH. Its platform is built specifically for hospitality, offering functionalities like invoice scheduling, refunds, and payment splitting, ideal for mid-sized to large hotels seeking operational automation. ROH’s proven track record with clients like Le Méridien St. Louis shows its capacity to improve cash flow and reduce manual effort.
If, on the other hand, you’re seeking a bare-bones payment gateway with minimal features, and your hotel operates on a very small scale or exploratory basis, Instamojo’s limited profile might suffice. However, the lack of recent activity or reviews makes this a risky choice.
ROH’s user experience is highly praised, with a 4.95/5 ease-of-use rating based on recent reviews from 10 users. Clients mention how intuitive and straightforward the platform is, with one user calling it "the easiest way to send and receive payments" and praising its simplicity, even for clients. Support is rated at 4.97/5, and onboarding is similarly rated at 4.92/5, indicating a smooth start.
Instamojo, by contrast, has a zero rating across all categories due to no recent reviews or user feedback. Its UI/UX status remains unverified, making it impossible to assess. Based on the data, edge: ROH.
ROH offers a comprehensive suite of 19 features, including refund management, pre-authorizations, payment splitting, and acceptance of multiple card types like Apple Pay, Google Pay, Visa, and American Express. These features support complex payment workflows, automation, and security, making it suitable for hotels with sophisticated needs.
Instamojo provides no documented features or integrations, making it impossible to compare meaningfully. Given ROH’s extensive feature set, it has a definitive edge for hotels seeking full payment infrastructure capabilities.
ROH’s recent customer support ratings are outstanding at 4.97/5, with reviews highlighting its ease of onboarding and ongoing support. Hotel staff praise ROH's responsiveness, support staff’s helpfulness, and the platform’s user-friendliness, which minimizes onboarding friction.
Instamojo’s support ratings are unavailable, with no recent reviews to gauge its support quality. The absence of recent support feedback puts Instamojo at a disadvantage. Edge: ROH.
Both products have one verified integration: Instamojo with Yanolja Cloud Solution and ROH with Oracle Hospitality. These integrations cover some hotel technology needs but are limited in scope, lacking broader, more flexible options.
ROH’s extensive feature set doesn’t necessarily include many integrations beyond its verified partner, but its platform’s design emphasizes flexibility and automation. Given the similar partnership count, but considering ROH’s broader feature set and industry focus, edge: ROH.
ROH’s reviews are recent, with 10 reviews in the past six months and an average NPS score of 9.91/5, indicating high customer satisfaction. Users across segments praise its ease of use, support, and automation capabilities, especially in the hospitality context.
Instamojo has zero reviews and ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction. The lack of recent feedback strongly favors ROH. Edge: ROH.
Instamojo’s pricing is not disclosed—likely because it offers no documented plans or features. Conversely, ROH charges a fixed $100 monthly base price, with no mention of additional per-room or implementation fees, indicating predictable costs.
Given the transparency and clarity of ROH’s pricing, it provides better value for hotels needing a scalable, feature-rich payments platform.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
ROH is a comprehensive, hospitality-focused payments platform with recent, strong reviews and a proven track record of supporting hotels in automating and improving cash flow. Its 19 features and high customer ratings demonstrate its suitability for mid-sized and larger properties looking for a strategic financial infrastructure.
Instamojo, lacking recent reviews and documented features, appears unfit for hotel use at this time. Its minimal and uncertain offering makes ROH the clear choice for hotels that want reliable, feature-rich payment processing.
If your hotel needs a scalable, well-supported payments platform with automation and integration capabilities, ROH is the definitive pick. For simple, small-scale needs, consider other minimal solutions—but beware of the lack of recent data for Instamojo.
According to HTR's product database, Instamojo and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Instamojo |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Instamojo and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Instamojo offers 1 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Instamojo: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Instamojo has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor