The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 370 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Jaras shines , with exclusive features like On premise.
Stayntouch shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Ancillary revenue tracking and Mobile App.
Side-by-side ratings based on 370 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $800/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 370 |
After analyzing 370 verified reviews, Jaras users most value its , while Stayntouch users highlight user-friendly interface, integration and onboarding, system performance and reliability. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Integration and Onboarding
▾
|
|
|
+
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
Room Management and Housekeeping
▾
|
|
|
−
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #18 51 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #5 208 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #7 29 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 58 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #6 220 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #6 180 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #3 152 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #14 17 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #4 262 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #12 64 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #21 3 reviews |
Choosing between Jaras by Jaras and Stayntouch by Stayntouch hinges on your hotel’s specific operational needs, scale, and growth ambitions. Both systems aim to streamline property management but differ significantly in features, market presence, and user experience. Jaras, a new entrant founded in 2023, offers a centralized, cloud-native platform with basic reservation capabilities, whereas Stayntouch, with over 317 reviews, provides a robust, multi-property cloud PMS with extensive integrations and advanced features. Which system aligns better with your goals?
Jaras aims to serve a wide array of accommodations, from resorts to chalets, with a focus on automation and simple reservation management. Stayntouch, on the other hand, targets hotels seeking a scalable, feature-rich PMS capable of multi-property oversight, with a proven track record and a high user rating. While Jaras’s on-premise option could appeal for certain local or regulatory reasons, Stayntouch’s cloud-first approach, extensive integrations, and recent reviews make it the more reliable choice for dynamic, growth-oriented hotels. Are you ready to compare their core strengths?
If your hotel needs a mature, highly-rated PMS with extensive third-party integrations, choose Stayntouch. It’s ideal for hotels prioritizing smooth onboarding, real-time cloud access, and a wide array of features like ancillary revenue tracking and guest apps. Conversely, if your hotel is looking for a modern, centrally managed system with a focus on automation and channel connectivity—especially with an eye toward on-premise deployment—Jaras could be appealing. However, Stayntouch’s more established presence and extensive review base favor larger or multi-property hotels.
Stayntouch’s user interface receives a 4.7/5 rating, praised for its intuitive design, mobile capabilities, and ease of onboarding. Reviewers highlight its friendly, straightforward screens that reduce staff training time and enhance daily operations. Conversely, Jaras’s usability rating is 0/5, with no recent reviews to gauge actual user experience, making it impossible to judge its interface or onboarding process. Given the detailed positive feedback on Stayntouch, it clearly holds the advantage here. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch offers 34 features exclusive to its platform, including mobile check-in, online checkout, guest apps, automated night audits, and integrated payment processing—features that Jaras doesn’t provide. Jaras’s single unique feature is its on-premise deployment, which may appeal for specific regulatory or security reasons but limits flexibility. Overall, with a significantly larger feature set and more advanced tools, Stayntouch provides a broader operational toolkit. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s reviews reveal a 4.68/5 support rating, with users describing their support as responsive, helpful, and easy to access—highlighted by comments like “their team is excellent, friendly, and thorough.” Jaras has no reviews available, so its support quality remains unverified. The recent, positive feedback on Stayntouch’s onboarding and ongoing assistance underscores its superior support reputation. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch boasts 188 verified integrations, including popular systems like RoomPriceGenie, STAAH, and various revenue management tools. Jaras, with zero verified partners, offers limited connectivity, primarily focused on in-house automation. For hotels that rely on a diverse tech stack, Stayntouch’s extensive integrations are a decisive advantage. Edge: Stayntouch.
Stayntouch’s overall rating of 4.56/5, based on 317 reviews, and a recent 9.35/10 NPS score, reflect strong customer satisfaction. Hotels across segments like boutique, city center, and branded properties praise its ease of use, speed, and support. Jaras, with zero reviews, cannot compete on reputation or user feedback, making Stayntouch the clearly favored choice among hoteliers. Edge: Stayntouch.
Jaras charges a flat $1,000 monthly fee with no trial, implementation, or setup costs mentioned. Stayntouch’s pricing starts at $800 per month, also without trial or setup fees. While both are comparable in price, the value for money depends on the features and support included, with Stayntouch’s extensive capabilities offering a better return for larger or multi-property hotels.
Stayntouch stands out as the more mature, feature-rich system with a proven track record, extensive integrations, and high customer ratings. Its cloud-based approach and focus on ease of use make it suitable for hotels looking to scale operations and enhance guest experiences. Jaras, though promising, is still new, with limited reviews and features, making it less suitable for hotels seeking stability and comprehensive functionality.
If you prioritize a well-established, supported platform with extensive features and integrations, go with Stayntouch. Its proven market presence and recent reviews give you confidence in reliable, ongoing performance.
However, if your hotel requires a straightforward, on-premise solution with basic reservation management, and you’re comfortable with a less proven track record, Jaras might work. For most hotels seeking growth, Stayntouch provides a safer, more comprehensive investment.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,000/mo | From $800/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Jaras and Stayntouch share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Automated night audit | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Group functionality | ||
| Integrated ID & Passport Scanner | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| On premise |
Showing top differences. 23 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 5 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Before leveraging Stayntouch PMS and Owner Relations, much of our old accounting processes were completed manually, including printing and hand-delivering statements to units, and..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"As an independent hotel that runs above 100% occupancy on many nights, the TWA Hotel finds Stayntouch integral to our operations."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements ar... The system's intuitive design allows for easy navigation, making it suitable for training new staff quickly. The visual and organizational elements are highlighted as aiding faster task execution and enhancing staff capability, thus improving guest interactions.
Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. T... Stayntouch is noted for its seamless integration and smooth onboarding processes, facilitated by individual support from staff like David and Julia. The guidance provided by these individuals was deemed invaluable, particularly for system transition and setup.
Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns ove... Stayntouch is generally reliable without major outages, providing continuous support via the cloud. Although positive, some users express concerns over the speed of addressing complex issues amidst rapid company growth.
Where hoteliers push back
While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack deta... While generally praised for accessible reports that support operations, users cite a need for more adaptive reporting features. Some reports lack detail or are hard to manipulate, highlighting the need for customizable analytics solutions.
Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functi... Room assignments and housekeeping functionalities receive positive feedback for enhancing operational efficiency. However, users request better functionality in room diary visibility and tasks scheduling to address specific management needs.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Jaras and Stayntouch share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Jaras offers 0 verified integration partners, while Stayntouch offers 187. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Stayntouch leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Jaras: No. Stayntouch: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Jaras has an HT Score of 0 and Stayntouch has 91. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor