The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 234 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Jonas Hospitality shines when it comes to customer service , with exclusive features like Guest App and Guest Messaging.
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and onboarding — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 234 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 25 | 209 |
After analyzing 234 verified reviews, Jonas Hospitality users most value its customer service, ease of use, continuous improvement, while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customer Service
▾
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
+
Continuous Improvement
▾
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
+
Advanced Reporting
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
User Interface and Accessibility
▾
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
−
Payment Processor Integration
▾
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
−
Reliability
▾
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #70 1 reviews | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #28 21 reviews | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #37 2 reviews | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #49 6 reviews | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #23 18 reviews | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #21 9 reviews | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #20 24 reviews | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing between Jonas Chorum by Jonas Hospitality and RoomRaccoon PMS hinges on your hotel's specific needs, operational scale, and growth trajectory. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they approach this goal differently: Jonas offers a full-featured system with robust reporting and extensive integrations, while RoomRaccoon emphasizes simplicity, automation, and user-friendly interfaces. Your decision should reflect whether your team prioritizes comprehensive functionality or ease of use with quick deployment.
While Jonas Chorum has a longer history and more regional presence in North America, RoomRaccoon boasts a significantly higher review count and more recent user feedback. This suggests that RoomRaccoon's current performance and customer satisfaction metrics are more reflective of their ongoing product evolution. Are you ready to focus on a proven, feature-rich platform or a modern, streamlined solution?
Jonas Chorum is designed for hotels needing a full-suite property management system with advanced reporting, robust integrations, and operational control. Its strengths lie in its comprehensive features such as task management, digital registration, and in-depth financial and operational reports, making it suitable for larger or more complex properties.
RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, caters primarily to small, independent hotels and boutique properties. It offers an all-in-one platform focusing on automating daily tasks, simplifying reservations, and boosting revenue through dynamic pricing and upsell features. Given the recent surge in reviews—169 for RoomRaccoon versus Jonas’s 24—and the recency of feedback, RoomRaccoon’s current user sentiment is more indicative of its performance.
Are you seeking a system built for large-scale, multi-property management or a straightforward tool that helps small teams do more with less effort?
If your hotel is an independent property or small chain with a focus on automation, ease of management, and rapid deployment, RoomRaccoon is the better fit. Its intuitive interface, automation of repetitive tasks, and the ability to increase direct bookings make it ideal for boutique hotels, B&Bs, and small resorts.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a detailed operational backbone with extensive reporting, multi-channel distribution, and integrations with large GDS or POS systems, Jonas Chorum is preferable. It suits hotels with complex operational needs—such as large resorts or branded hotels—that benefit from detailed analytics, task management, and compliance features.
Your choice should reflect whether your priority is rapid growth and simplicity (RoomRaccoon) or comprehensive control and scalability (Jonas).
RoomRaccoon scores higher for ease of use with a 4.74/5 rating, reflecting its modern, user-friendly interface, streamlined onboarding, and simple navigation. Many users praise its quick learning curve, especially for small teams managing reservations, check-ins, and guest communications.
Jonas Chorum, with a 4.35/5 rating, is also rated highly but is slightly more complex due to its extensive feature set and detailed reporting modules. While its interface is designed to be approachable, some users note system freezes and a steeper learning curve.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Jonas offers 15 unique features, including 24/7 online support, task management, and PCI/GDPR compliance—features critical for larger or highly regulated hotels. Its features support complex operations like rules-based room assignments, spa/wellness modules, and digital registration.
RoomRaccoon provides 17 exclusive features such as multi-currency support, guest CRM, inventory management, and unlimited channels without extra costs. Its standout features include dynamic pricing tools, integrated payment terminals, and automation for guest communications.
While both systems share 34 features, Jonas's additional compliance and operational modules cater to larger, multi-faceted hotels, whereas RoomRaccoon’s automation and dynamic pricing are better suited for small to medium properties.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Jonas Hospitality's support is consistently praised, with a 4.6/5 rating, and many reviews highlight prompt, knowledgeable assistance. Hoteliers appreciate the personalized service, especially when resolving technical issues or customizing reports.
RoomRaccoon’s support scores slightly lower at 4.53/5, but users still report helpfulness and responsiveness, particularly during onboarding. Some reviews mention longer wait times, but overall, customer service is regarded as effective.
Edge: Jonas Chorum.
RoomRaccoon leads with 88 verified integrations, including popular partners like Sage, Paxxio, and Becurious, alongside common integrations such as SiteMinder and Revinate. Its flexible ecosystem allows for extensive customization and connection with third-party systems.
Jonas Hospitality integrates with 28 verified partners, including key players like Oracle Hospitality and Shift4 Payments, but offers fewer options overall. Its integrations tend to favor larger enterprise systems, making it more suitable for hotels with complex operational needs.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon has a higher overall rating of 4.88/5 based on 169 reviews in the last 6 months, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, automation, and revenue growth. Hoteliers consistently praise its role in increasing direct bookings and simplifying management.
Jonas Hospitality’s rating is 4.59/5 from 24 reviews, with positive comments on its stability and reporting but fewer recent reviews to gauge current performance. The limited review count and recency favor RoomRaccoon’s higher, more current ratings.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Jonas Hospitality does not publicly list its pricing; typically, it offers customized quotes based on property size and needs, which can be a barrier for smaller hotels. Implementation fees and ongoing costs are often part of the package, and the system is positioned as a premium solution.
RoomRaccoon charges a flat monthly fee of $1,000, with no implementation fees or hidden costs. Its clear pricing structure makes budgeting straightforward for small and independent hotels.
Jonas Chorum offers a broad, customizable platform suited for hotels with complex operational needs, large distribution networks, and compliance requirements. Its extensive features support growth but come with higher costs and a steeper learning curve.
RoomRaccoon stands out as a streamlined, easy-to-adopt system that excels in automating small-to-medium hotel operations, increasing direct bookings, and reducing manual effort. Its recent reviews confirm high user satisfaction and a strong value proposition for independent hoteliers.
If your hotel values detailed control, compliance, and scalability, Jonas is the better choice. For small properties looking to simplify management and boost revenue quickly, RoomRaccoon delivers a more current, highly-rated experience.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $1,100/mo | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Jonas Chorum and RoomRaccoon PMS share 34 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated reminders | ||
| Digital Registration | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest App | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| PMS connectivity | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 20 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Jonas Chorum's customer service receives high praise for being responsive, knowledgeable, and eager to solve issues. Specific mentions of exemplary em... Jonas Chorum's customer service receives high praise for being responsive, knowledgeable, and eager to solve issues. Specific mentions of exemplary employees highlight the personalized support experienced by many users.
The PMS's simplicity and intuitive design make it easy to use for staff, including new hires, thus reducing training time and improving operational ef... The PMS's simplicity and intuitive design make it easy to use for staff, including new hires, thus reducing training time and improving operational efficiency. Users commend the system's capabilities in handling group bookings and rates.
Hoteliers have noted that Jonas Chorum actively seeks user feedback and often implements suggested improvements. This responsiveness fosters a collabo... Hoteliers have noted that Jonas Chorum actively seeks user feedback and often implements suggested improvements. This responsiveness fosters a collaborative relationship between the company and its clients, supporting service evolution.
Where hoteliers push back
Many users appreciate Jonas Chorum's easy-to-navigate UI and cross-platform accessibility. It supports functions like group blocking and report genera... Many users appreciate Jonas Chorum's easy-to-navigate UI and cross-platform accessibility. It supports functions like group blocking and report generation efficiently, making it user-friendly for both beginners and experienced staff.
Jonas Chorum's enforceable payment processor integration has been a significant negative point. Users are required to use a specific processor, incurr... Jonas Chorum's enforceable payment processor integration has been a significant negative point. Users are required to use a specific processor, incurring additional costs and facing operational disruptions. This mandatory integration affects several properties, adding financial and operational strain.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Jonas Chorum and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Jonas Chorum offers 28 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Jonas Chorum: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Jonas Hospitality has an HT Score of 18 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor