The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 41 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Kwentra shines in customer support and ROI , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Revenue management module.
Shiji Group shines when it comes to ease of use , with exclusive features like Guest profiles and Tablet/Kiosk Check-in.
Side-by-side ratings based on 41 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,200/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 7 | 34 |
After analyzing 41 verified reviews, Kwentra users most value its , while Shiji Group users highlight ease of use, support team, implementation. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Support Team
▾
|
|
|
+
Implementation
▾
|
|
|
+
Training Materials
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Reporting and Analytics
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | #68 1 reviews | #53 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #50 3 reviews | #31 17 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #29 3 reviews | #11 13 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #22 2 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #52 3 reviews | #33 17 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #49 3 reviews | #24 25 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #58 1 reviews | #22 19 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #45 2 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #66 0 reviews | #33 4 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #30 8 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | — | #14 5 reviews |
| Middle East ▾ | #9 6 reviews | #5 14 reviews |
Choosing between Kwentra by Kwentra and Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS hinges on your hotel’s specific needs, operational scale, and budget. Both systems aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in features, market presence, and user feedback. Your goal should be to identify which platform aligns best with your property’s size, segment, and technological maturity.
Kwentra offers a tailored, user-friendly experience with a high satisfaction rate among its reviews, whereas Shiji Group’s platform boasts a broader scope of features and a significantly larger user base, especially among luxury and branded hotels. Do you prioritize a system with high ease of use and recent positive reviews, or a solution with extensive features and global reach?
Kwentra stands out as a straightforward, cloud-based property management system designed for hotels that prioritize simplicity, ease of use, and rapid onboarding. It is best suited for properties seeking a reliable system with excellent support and a strong focus on core functions like reservations, guest management, and reporting.
In contrast, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS caters to hotels and chains that require a comprehensive, highly customizable platform with an extensive set of features including multi-lingual support, integrated CRS, advanced revenue management, and guest profiles. Its broader feature set appeals to larger or more complex operations with diverse needs.
If you need a simple, fast-to-deploy PMS with high user ratings and recent reviews, Kwentra is the better choice. If your hotel demands a scalable, feature-rich system capable of supporting multiple locations and complex workflows, Shiji Group’s platform is more suitable.
Kwentra earns a 4.83/5 ease of use score based on its streamlined interface and positive reviews emphasizing quick learning curves. Its onboarding process is rated 4.75/5, with users highlighting minimal training time and high staff adoption, supported by consistent positive feedback on support responsiveness.
Shiji Group’s platform scores 4.63/5 for ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive design and helpful training materials, including videos. However, some review comments mention occasional system speed issues and a steeper learning curve for advanced features.
Edge: Kwentra. Its high ease of use rating, recent positive reviews, and quick onboarding make it more accessible for hotels seeking immediate operational efficiency.
Kwentra offers 6 exclusive features, such as a mobile app, channel manager, booking engine, revenue management, guest CRM, and on-premise deployment. These features target core operational needs with a focus on ease and flexibility.
Shiji Group provides 57 features, including multi-lingual support, online check-in/out, integrated CRS, task management, digital registration, housekeepings mobile apps, detailed reporting, and extensive automation tools. Their feature set supports complex, large-scale operations with diverse requirements.
While Kwentra’s features cover essential hotel management needs efficiently, Shiji’s platform is more comprehensive, especially for large or multi-property groups. For hoteliers seeking advanced automation and customization, Shiji’s extensive features provide a clear advantage.
Edge: Shiji Group. Its larger feature set caters to hotels with complex needs, multi-property management, or those seeking extensive automation.
Kwentra’s customer support scores 4.83/5, with reviews praising quick responses, helpfulness, and personalized service. Hoteliers value its dedicated support in onboarding and resolving issues, making it a reliable partner for small to medium properties.
Shiji Group’s support scores 4.53/5, with users noting the professionalism and availability of their 24/7 support team. Reviewers mention that the support is helpful but sometimes slower during peak times or with complex customization requests.
Edge: Kwentra. Its higher support ratings and recent positive reviews affirm its reputation for attentive, effective customer service, especially beneficial for hotels prioritizing hands-on support.
Shiji Group boasts 64 verified integrations, including notable partners like Amadeus, Revinate, Oaky, and Sabre, supporting a broad ecosystem of hotel technology. Its integrations cover distribution, guest communication, revenue management, and more, suitable for complex, multi-system setups.
Kwentra offers 18 verified partners, including SiteMinder and Onity, with key integrations like channel managers and booking engines. Its ecosystem is smaller but focused on core operational needs.
If extensive third-party integration is critical, Shiji’s vast network provides more options. For hotels with simpler or more targeted setups, Kwentra’s integrated partners are sufficient.
Edge: Shiji Group. Its broader selection of integrations supports larger or more complex hotel operations.
Kwentra, with only 6 reviews, maintains a perfect 5/5 rating, with all reviews rated 5/5 and recent ones highlighting its simplicity and support. Its high satisfaction rate suggests a strong fit for smaller, operation-focused hotels.
Shiji Group, with 32 reviews, has a 0/5 rating, which indicates widespread dissatisfaction or issues. Recent reviews mention performance limitations, reporting hurdles, and customization challenges, especially among luxury and branded hotels.
Given the review count and recent data, Kwentra’s hotelier ratings are more favorable. Its high scores reflect consistent satisfaction among its user base.
Edge: Kwentra. Its higher, more recent ratings and smaller review base suggest a more reliable experience for hotels.
Kwentra does not disclose specific pricing but appears to operate on a bespoke, tailored quote model, with no indication of freemium options or monthly fees directly mentioned. Its value proposition seems focused on personalized packages.
Shiji Group charges a base price of $1,200 per month, with no free trial or clear tiered pricing. This fixed fee suggests a higher entry cost that may include extensive features and support.
If budget certainty and clear pricing are priorities, Shiji’s fixed monthly fee provides transparency, but Kwentra’s custom pricing might be more adaptable for smaller hotels.
Kwentra is designed for properties that want simplicity, reliability, and excellent support, especially in markets like Europe, Middle East, and Asia Pacific.
Shiji’s platform suits hotels aiming for a high level of operational automation, detailed analytics, and global connectivity.
The core difference is scalability: Kwentra offers a streamlined, user-focused platform with excellent support and high satisfaction among small to mid-sized hotels. It excels in core PMS functions with straightforward deployment and a focus on operational efficiency.
Shiji Group’s platform provides a wide array of features, integrations, and customization options designed for larger or more complex hotel operations. Its extensive ecosystem supports multi-location management, automation, and detailed guest profiling but may come with performance and support challenges based on recent reviews.
If your hotel seeks simplicity, quick onboarding, and high satisfaction, Kwentra is the better choice. For larger properties or chains needing a comprehensive, flexible system with extensive integrations, Shiji Group’s Daylight PMS should be your focus.
This detailed comparison should help you decide which platform aligns with your hotel’s size, segment, and strategic goals. Both systems have their strengths, but your decision must prioritize your operational needs and growth plans.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,200/mo |
According to HTR's product database, kwentra and Shiji Daylight PMS share 41 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Centralized user & role management | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| On premise | ||
| Online Check-in | ||
| Revenue management module | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Task Management |
Showing top differences. 51 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"All the big players don't offer the level of API connectivity we need, but Shiji does. From the early stages of our design process, we were confident that Shiji could provide us wi..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We reduced check-in time by over 80%, from up to eight minutes to just about one minute with the new system."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. Thi... Users frequently praise Shiji PMS for its user-friendly interface, which simplifies daily operations and reduces the learning curve for new users. This ease of use is highlighted in reviews citing accessible training materials, intuitive design, and efficient task performance.
The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and help... The supportive and responsive nature of the Shiji PMS support team is consistently mentioned positively. Users appreciate the professionalism and helpfulness of the support personnel, which greatly aids in smoother operations.
The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implemen... The implementation process of Shiji PMS is noted as smooth and efficient by several reviewers, who appreciate the knowledgeable and proactive implementation team. However, a few users suggest that reducing the implementation timeline could further improve the experience.
Where hoteliers push back
While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific re... While the detailed reporting features of Shiji PMS are largely appreciated, several users demand more advanced and faster reporting tools. Specific requests include enhanced summary reports, detailed billing, and faster report generation processes.
Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operat... Performance issues related to system speed and consistency are common concerns among users, with several noting slow response times during peak operations. Users urge improvements in system speed to enhance overall efficiency.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. kwentra and Shiji Daylight PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. kwentra offers 18 verified integration partners, while Shiji Daylight PMS offers 64. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Shiji Daylight PMS leads in ease of use at 4.6/5 vs 4.4/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
kwentra: No. Shiji Daylight PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Kwentra has an HT Score of 0 and Shiji Group has 75. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor