The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 209 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Lodgable shines .
RoomRaccoon shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Payment processing.
Side-by-side ratings based on 209 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 209 |
After analyzing 209 verified reviews, Lodgable users most value its , while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| Lodgable |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | Lodgable |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | Lodgable |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | Lodgable |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | — | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | — | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
Choosing a property management system (PMS) for your hotel is a crucial decision that impacts daily operations, revenue, and guest satisfaction. Both Lodgable and RoomRaccoon aim to streamline your processes, but their approaches and capabilities differ significantly. Lodgable is marketed as a simple, vacation rental-focused platform with limited recent reviews and no verified integrations, whereas RoomRaccoon offers a comprehensive, feature-rich system with a strong presence in multiple regions and a large, recent review base. Which system aligns better with your hotel’s needs?
Lodgable positions itself as a straightforward property management solution tailored primarily for vacation rentals and small boutique properties, emphasizing ease of use. However, with zero reviews in the last six months, its ability to meet modern hotel demands remains unverified, especially compared to RoomRaccoon, which boasts over 169 reviews, a 4.88/5 rating, and recent activity.
RoomRaccoon’s reviews focus heavily on its all-in-one platform that combines PMS, channel manager, booking engine, and automation tools. Users praise its intuitive interface, automation features, and revenue management capabilities—yet some mention system bugs and support delays. Does Lodgable’s simplicity outweigh RoomRaccoon’s extensive feature set? Likely not, given the strength of recent reviews and higher user confidence in RoomRaccoon.
If your hotel needs a basic system to manage limited bookings with minimal automation, Lodgable might seem appropriate. However, with no recent reviews and a lack of verified integrations, its ability to support growth or complex operations is unproven.
If, instead, your hotel is looking for a scalable platform that automates reservations, manages guest communications, and integrates across multiple channels, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its 94% likelihood to recommend, recent reviews, and extensive feature set demonstrate its suitability for small to medium-sized properties seeking efficiency and growth. For larger or more complex hotels, the decision might differ, but for most independent hotels, RoomRaccoon’s proven track record makes it the superior option.
Lodgable’s user interface and onboarding process are not rated or reviewed, making its ease of use uncertain. Conversely, RoomRaccoon’s platform scores 4.74/5 for ease of use, with many users citing its intuitive design, simple onboarding, and quick staff adoption.
Recent reviews highlight that users find RoomRaccoon straightforward to learn, with some praising its minimal training requirements. Given the lack of recent feedback on Lodgable’s usability, Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Lodgable offers no exclusive features or integrations, focusing instead on basic property management functions. In contrast, RoomRaccoon provides 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, mobile app, guest CRM, automated night audit, and real-time reporting.
Its robust suite enables automation of tasks like invoicing, dynamic pricing, guest communication, and online check-in, which Lodgable does not appear to support. For comprehensive management, RoomRaccoon’s extensive features give it a decisive edge.
There are no recent reviews or ratings for Lodgable’s support, making it impossible to assess its responsiveness or quality. Meanwhile, RoomRaccoon’s support scores 4.53/5, with many users describing its team as responsive, helpful, and eager to improve the user experience.
Review quotes showcase support that assists with onboarding, troubleshooting, and system customization, despite some delays. Given the available data, Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Lodgable lacks verified partnerships or integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or third-party tools. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, has 88 verified partners, including key integrations like Sage, RevControl, and Flexipass, alongside several unique and shared partners.
Its extensive integration options allow for smoother workflows, automated updates, and less manual effort. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon enjoys a 4.88/5 overall rating based on 169 reviews, with recent feedback confirming high satisfaction, especially from independent hotels and boutique properties. Its recent reviews highlight its ease of use, automation, and revenue growth.
Lodgable has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to gauge user satisfaction. Given the data, RoomRaccoon’s rating and recent reviews clearly establish it as the more trusted choice. Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Lodgable’s pricing model is not publicly available, suggesting it might be a custom or limited offering. Conversely, RoomRaccoon charges a flat base price of $1,000 per month, with no additional implementation or per-room fees.
While the higher upfront cost might seem significant, the extensive features, integrations, and proven support justify the investment for most hotels. Lodgable’s lack of transparent pricing makes comparison difficult, but the value offered by RoomRaccoon is evident.
RoomRaccoon is a complete, feature-rich PMS that consolidates operations into a single, user-friendly platform. Its recent reviews, high satisfaction ratings, and extensive integration capabilities position it as a reliable choice for small to medium-sized hotels aiming to grow.
Lodgable, while simple, lacks recent validation, notable features, and integration options, making it less suited for modern hotel operations. For hotels seeking efficiency, automation, and growth potential, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner.
If your hotel needs a straightforward, low-cost system with basic functions, Lodgable might suffice—but for most hotels aiming for automation, scalability, and proven support, RoomRaccoon is the better investment.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| Lodgable |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Lodgable and RoomRaccoon PMS share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | Lodgable |
|
|---|---|---|
| Booking Engine | ||
| Calendar view | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| Custom rates | ||
| Payment processing | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 39 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Lodgable and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Lodgable offers 0 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Lodgable: No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Lodgable has an HT Score of 0 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor