Lodging System vs. RoomRaccoon PMS:
Which Is Right for You?

The Decision

Choosing a property management system (PMS) is pivotal for your hotel’s success, particularly when balancing ease of use, features, support, and cost. Lodging System promises integrated operations but offers no reviews or recent feedback, which makes its viability uncertain. RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, has accumulated 169 reviews with recent feedback and a high overall rating, indicating more reliable performance and customer satisfaction. Which system will truly meet your needs?

Both products aim to streamline hotel management, but their approaches and maturity differ significantly. Lodging System claims an all-in-one platform, yet lacks evidence of recent user feedback, while RoomRaccoon’s proven track record highlights a comprehensive, well-reviewed platform. Are you ready to prioritize proven customer satisfaction and recent performance?

Is Lodging System or RoomRaccoon Better for Hotels?

Lodging System positions itself as a comprehensive solution, integrating PMS, CRM, POS, and channel distribution. However, the absence of recent reviews or a large user base raises questions about its current performance and reliability. RoomRaccoon, with over 169 reviews and recent activity (5 reviews in the last six months), confirms its active presence and consistent user feedback, making it a more dependable choice.

While Lodging System offers core functionalities, the lack of recent validation means your team might face unanticipated issues or limited support. RoomRaccoon’s ongoing updates, recent reviews, and high recommendation rate (94%) demonstrate its ability to adapt and satisfy small to medium-sized hotels. Do you prefer a system with proven recent user satisfaction?

RoomRaccoon vs Lodging System: Which Should Your Hotel Choose?

If your hotel operates in Europe or North America and needs a flexible, user-friendly platform with a broad feature set, RoomRaccoon is the clear choice. Its extensive features—channel management, booking engine, revenue management, automation, and guest CRM—are backed by high ratings (overall 4.88/5) and recent reviews. It suits independent hotels, boutique properties, and small chains seeking automation and revenue growth.

Lodging System, with no current reviews or verified regional presence, might appeal to hotels looking for a basic, all-in-one option without a proven track record. If your priorities are cost and simplicity and you’re willing to accept uncertainty, it could be considered, but RoomRaccoon’s established presence and positive feedback strongly favor it for most hoteliers.

Is Lodging System or RoomRaccoon Easier to Use?

RoomRaccoon receives a 4.74/5 ease-of-use rating, with reviews praising its intuitive interface, quick onboarding, and minimal staff training requirements. Users report that managing reservations and automating guest communication is straightforward, with some noting that the system’s mobile app further enhances usability.

Lodging System has a 0/5 rating, indicating no available recent user feedback on ease of use, which raises concerns. Without current reviews, it’s difficult to assess how user-friendly or accessible the platform is for your team. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Features: Lodging System or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon outshines Lodging System by offering 51 unique features, including a channel manager, revenue management, booking engine, automated night audit, guest CRM, online check-in, and a mobile app. It also provides automation tools like guest communication, dynamic pricing, and integrated payment processing, making daily operations more efficient.

Lodging System offers no listed features beyond the PMS, CRM, and POS, with no verified integrations or advanced tools. Its lack of detailed features makes it less versatile for hotels looking to scale or automate their processes. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has Better Customer Support: Lodging System or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon’s support and onboarding are rated 4.61/5, with reviews citing quick, helpful responses and ease of onboarding. Users consistently mention that the support team is eager to assist and resolve issues promptly, which facilitates smoother operations.

Lodging System’s support score is unlisted, and with no recent reviews, it’s impossible to gauge current support quality. Given RoomRaccoon’s reputation and recent positive feedback, it’s clearer which system offers more reliable customer service. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Has More Integrations: Lodging System or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon boasts 88 verified integrations, including partners like Sage, RevControl, and Paxxio, along with a marketplace of 88 integrations. These integrations allow your hotel to connect with payment gateways, accounting, and other operational tools, enhancing flexibility.

Lodging System has no verified partners listed, limiting its ability to connect with other systems or expand functionality. For hotels seeking a versatile and connected platform, RoomRaccoon’s integration ecosystem is a decisive advantage. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

Which Do Hoteliers Rate Higher: Lodging System or RoomRaccoon?

RoomRaccoon receives an overall rating of 4.88/5 from 169 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing ease of use, automation, and support. The high rating and positive comments indicate strong satisfaction among its user base, especially among small and boutique hotels.

Lodging System’s rating is 0/5, with no reviews or recent feedback, making it impossible to determine user sentiment. The clear choice based on ratings and reviews is RoomRaccoon. Edge: RoomRaccoon.

How Much Do Lodging System and RoomRaccoon Cost?

Lodging System does not list any pricing details, leaving potential buyers uncertain about costs. RoomRaccoon charges $1,000 upfront, with no mention of ongoing fees or additional charges, which simplifies budgeting.

Without transparent pricing from Lodging System, RoomRaccoon’s clear and published fee structure makes it easier to evaluate value. For most hotels, this transparency supports a more informed decision.

What Type of Hotel Should Use Lodging System?

• Hotels that prioritize a simple, all-in-one platform without complex features.
• Small properties seeking basic PMS, CRM, and POS functionalities.
• Hotels with limited regional needs, especially outside of active markets, given Lodging System’s unclear market presence.
• Teams that want to avoid ongoing costs and prefer a one-time solution (if available).

Not ideal if:

• Your hotel relies heavily on integrations or automation.
• You operate in regions where Lodging System is not verified.
• You need recent reviews or proven customer support.

What Type of Hotel Should Use RoomRaccoon?

• Independent hotels and boutique properties looking for an easy-to-use, integrated PMS.
• Hotels seeking tools for revenue management, dynamic pricing, and automation.
• Small to medium-sized hotels in Europe, North America, or Africa that value verified support and regular updates.
• Teams aiming to increase direct bookings and reduce reliance on OTAs.

Not ideal if:

• You manage a large hotel or chain requiring highly advanced, enterprise-level solutions.
• Your hotel operates outside RoomRaccoon’s primary regions (Europe, Africa, North America).
• You prefer a system with no recent reviews or proven ongoing support.

RoomRaccoon vs Lodging System: The Bottom Line for Hotels

RoomRaccoon’s proven track record, extensive feature set, and recent high ratings make it the stronger choice for most independent hotels and small chains. Its high user satisfaction, integrations, and support ensure your team can operate efficiently and scale with confidence.

Lodging System presents a less certain option, with no recent reviews or verified market presence, making it a risky choice. If you want a reliable, well-supported, and feature-rich PMS, RoomRaccoon should be your first consideration.

For hotels seeking a modern, all-in-one platform with proven success and active support, RoomRaccoon is the clear winner. Lodging System might appeal only to those with very specific, limited needs or existing arrangements, but the lack of recent validation is a concern.