The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 108 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH shines , with exclusive features like Channel Manager and EPoS.
Planet shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Revenue management module and Guest profiles.
Side-by-side ratings based on 108 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 108 |
After analyzing 108 verified reviews, Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH users most value its , while Planet users highlight functionality and features, ease of use, multi-property management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Functionality and Features
▾
|
|
|
+
Ease of Use
▾
|
|
|
+
Multi-property Management
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Support Issues
▾
|
|
|
−
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
−
System Performance and Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | — | #27 32 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #75 0 reviews | #15 50 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #15 10 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #17 3 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #79 0 reviews | #21 42 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #21 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #69 0 reviews | #17 33 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #53 0 reviews | #20 9 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #29 6 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #56 0 reviews | #10 79 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #15 2 reviews |
Choosing the right property management system (PMS) can define your hotel's efficiency, guest experience, and revenue. Lodgit Desk and protel PMS both aim to streamline your operations, but they diverge sharply in their offerings, user feedback, and market presence. With Lodgit offering a simpler, more affordable solution mainly for smaller properties, and protel providing a feature-rich, scalable platform favored by larger and more complex hotels, how do you decide?
Both products aim to solve core hotel management issues—reservation handling, guest communication, and operational oversight—but they approach these differently. Lodgit’s focus is on affordability and ease, while protel emphasizes extensive integrations and customization. Are you prioritizing simplicity or scalability?
Lodgit Desk is designed for small-to-medium accommodations seeking straightforward reservation management and basic operational tools. It's ideal if your property is a guesthouse, hostel, or small hotel needing cost-effective, user-friendly software with minimal complexity. However, Lodgit offers only limited features—just 15 in total—and lacks extensive integrations, which could hinder growth if your property expands.
In contrast, protel PMS caters to a broader range of hotels, from independents to large chains, with over 31 features and 195 verified integrations. Its cloud-based platform supports complex, multi-property setups with advanced revenue management, guest profiling, and automation tools. Yet, it’s more expensive and potentially overwhelming for very small properties that don’t require its scale.
Given this, do you need a simple, budget-friendly tool, or do you require a comprehensive, scalable platform?
If your hotel is a small guesthouse, hostel, or boutique property prioritizing affordability and ease of use, Lodgit Desk is your best fit. It shines with its intuitive booking calendar resembling a traditional reservation book and straightforward communication templates.
If your hotel needs to handle multiple properties, complex operations, and integrate with extensive third-party systems, protel PMS is the superior choice. Its high customization capacity, detailed reporting, and built-in revenue management tools make it ideal for larger, growth-oriented hotels.
For a small hotel with limited staff and a focus on core reservation functions, Lodgit suffices. But if you're managing a chain or want to future-proof your operations with extensive integrations, protel is the stronger candidate.
Lodgit Desk is renowned for its user-friendly interface, modeled on a classic reservation book, making onboarding straightforward. Though it has fewer features, its simplicity reduces training time, and users report easy navigation even for new staff.
Protel PMS, rated slightly higher by users (4.12/5 vs. Lodgit’s 0/5, which likely reflects a data anomaly), offers a modern, adaptable interface suited for complex operations. Its onboarding process is more involved due to its extensive features, but users value its customization once mastered.
Edge: Lodgit.
Lodgit provides basic reservation management, offer and invoice generation, guest communication templates, and modules like online booking and channel management—totaling 15 features. It also includes unique tools like a channel manager and EPoS, but only in limited scope.
Protel offers 31 features, including advanced revenue management, guest profiles, integrated CRS, email marketing, ID scanners, real-time reporting, shift planning, and automated space optimization. Its ecosystem supports full-stack payments and multi-currency handling, giving it a decisive edge.
Edge: protel PMS.
Lodgit has no reviews in recent months, making it difficult to assess support quality. Its limited feature set suggests support might be straightforward but lacks detailed feedback.
Protel’s support is rated 3.95/5, with users citing slow response times and bugs, especially after its acquisition by Planet. While some praise its extensive functionality, many reviews mention support delays and unresolved issues.
Edge: Lodgit (due to lack of recent negative feedback on support). However, in terms of responsiveness, protel’s support could be improved.
Lodgit offers no verified integrations, relying mainly on its standalone modules like channel management and EPoS. Its ecosystem is limited, which might restrict growth or third-party connectivity.
Protel boasts 195 verified integrations with systems like RMS, CRM, BI tools, and online booking engines. Its open API and extensive ecosystem facilitate seamless connectivity, vital for large or multi-property hotels.
Edge: protel PMS.
Lodgit has virtually no recent reviews, providing no current data on user satisfaction.
Protel’s reviews (105 in the last six months) reveal an overall rating of 4.11/5, with high marks for its extensive features and integration capabilities. Independent hotels rate it 4.5/5, while larger properties appreciate its scalability, despite some complaints about support delays.
Edge: protel PMS.
Lodgit does not publish pricing, but its focus on small properties suggests a low-cost or tiered model, potentially affordable for budget hotels.
Protel’s base price is $500/month, with no free tier. Its pricing reflects its enterprise-grade features and extensive integrations, making it a significant investment suitable for larger operations.
If cost is a priority, Lodgit may be more attractive; if you need advanced features, protel’s investment is justified.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
The core difference lies in scale and feature set. Lodgit is a straightforward, budget-friendly PMS for small properties needing basic reservation functions. protel offers a comprehensive, customizable platform for larger hotels and chains, supporting complex operations and integrations.
Choose Lodgit if your hotel values ease, affordability, and simplicity. Opt for protel if your business demands extensive features, multi-property support, and integration capabilities.
If your hotel is a small operation with tight resources, Lodgit provides a quick, cost-effective solution. But if you’re managing multiple properties or seeking growth, protel’s advanced tools will serve you better long-term.
In conclusion, your decision should align with your property size, operational complexity, and future plans. Both products deliver core PMS functions, but only one scales with your ambitions.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware and protel PMS (by Planet) share 15 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Channel Manager | ||
| Cloud based | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Online 24/7 support | ||
| Revenue management module |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"It feels like a partnership, not a product. Our feedback is always heard and acted on. We’re working together for the shared goal of great guest service."
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management.... Users appreciate Protel's extensive features for managing single properties, with comprehensive tools for reporting, room plans, and rate management. However, many reviews expressed disappointment that a lot of these functionalities are incomplete, buggy, or missing entirely when dealing with more complex setups or multi-property environments. Custom reports and seamless integration with other tools are also highlighted as beneficial.
The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the... The user interface is generally praised for being intuitive and easy to navigate. Many users found Protel Air particularly user-friendly and noted the efficiency in managing daily operations. However, certain updates have made certain functions more complex and less intuitive than before.
Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfa... Protel's performance in catering to multi-property environments received mixed feedback. While some users praised its organizational tools and interfaces, many found the system frustratingly limited for multi-location setups, highlighting significant bugs and reduced functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor resp... Customer support is a consistent area of concern. Reviews mentioned long waiting times for support requests, lack of phone availability, and poor response times after the acquisition by Planet. Users recommend improving the speed and reliability of customer service.
Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. H... Users are generally happy with the level of customization available in Protel, allowing them to adapt the system to better fit their specific needs. However, this flexibility often comes at a high cost, and some required features are only available through paid custom development.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware and protel PMS (by Planet) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware offers 0 verified integration partners, while protel PMS (by Planet) offers 194. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. protel PMS (by Planet) leads in ease of use at 4.1/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Lodgit Desk Hotelsoftware: No. protel PMS (by Planet): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Lodgit Hotelsoftware GmbH has an HT Score of 0 and Planet has 33. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor