Sorry, this functionality is only available for verified hoteliers
The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
Loopon In-Stay vs. ReGuest Guest Communication:
Which Is Right for You?
TLDR
We analyzed 30 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Loopon shines in ROI .
Reguest shines when it comes to communication efficiency , with exclusive features like Messaging Guest Surveys and Team Messaging.
How Does Loopon In-Stay Compare to ReGuest Guest Communication?
Side-by-side ratings based on 30 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 1 | 29 |
What Are the Pros and Cons of Loopon In-Stay vs ReGuest Guest Communication?
After analyzing 30 verified reviews, Loopon users most value its , while Reguest users highlight communication efficiency, user-friendly interface, customization and flexibility. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Communication Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User-Friendly Interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Statistics and Reporting
▾
|
|
|
−
Modular and Template Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Mobile Accessibility
▾
|
|
Loopon vs Reguest: Rankings by Hotel Segment
How each product ranks among Guest Messaging Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #22 0 reviews | #9 11 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #17 1 reviews | #16 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | #13 0 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #16 0 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #22 0 reviews | #15 11 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #25 0 reviews | #15 10 reviews |
| Branded / Chain | #21 0 reviews | #23 4 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #26 0 reviews | #12 5 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America | #22 0 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #9 1 reviews | #6 28 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #14 0 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #8 0 reviews | — |
Which Features Does Loopon In-Stay Have That ReGuest Guest Communication Doesn't (and Vice Versa)?
According to HTR's product database, Loopon In-Stay and ReGuest Guest Communication share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated Opt-In/Consent Collection | ||
| Automated Replies | ||
| Chatbot Booking Agent | ||
| Messaging Guest Surveys | ||
| Open API | ||
| Secured Data Protection |
Showing top differences. 26 more features differ between these products.
Loopon vs Reguest: The Bottom Line
Ranks higher for
What hoteliers love
ReGuest stands out for its efficient chat functions, allowing quick and intuitive guest communication which simplifies operations and enhances guest s... ReGuest stands out for its efficient chat functions, allowing quick and intuitive guest communication which simplifies operations and enhances guest satisfaction.
The platform is acknowledged for its user-friendly interface, with quick, intuitive handling and a motivating design that is appreciated by many users... The platform is acknowledged for its user-friendly interface, with quick, intuitive handling and a motivating design that is appreciated by many users.
ReGuest's modular system offers flexibility and personalization but increases costs, which is a concern for some users.
Where hoteliers push back
The system provides clear and fast statistics, although some users wish for more detailed analyses, particularly of specific messages.
While offering some customizable options, the platform has limited self-implementing features and intuitive setup for new templates.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
Frequently Asked Questions About Loopon In-Stay vs ReGuest Guest Communication
Can Loopon In-Stay replace ReGuest Guest Communication?
It depends on your requirements. Loopon In-Stay and ReGuest Guest Communication share many core Guest Messaging Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Loopon In-Stay offers 11 verified integration partners, while ReGuest Guest Communication offers 20. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Which is better for small or independent hotels?
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Loopon In-Stay leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 4.8/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Do Loopon In-Stay or ReGuest Guest Communication offer a free plan?
Loopon In-Stay: No. ReGuest Guest Communication: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Guest Messaging Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
How Does HTR Evaluate and Rank Loopon In-Stay and ReGuest Guest Communication?
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Loopon has an HT Score of 0 and Reguest has 76. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
What Other Guest Messaging Software Comparisons Are Hoteliers Reading?
Explore more head-to-head comparisons based on verified hotelier reviews.
Contents
Get personalized product recommendations
Product recommendations advisor
