The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 886 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Mews shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for independent properties (4.9/5) , with exclusive features like Guest CRM and Guest profiles.
Octorate shines , with exclusive features like Performance Reporting and On premise.
Side-by-side ratings based on 886 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 886 | 0 |
After analyzing 886 verified reviews, Mews users most value its customization and flexibility, automation and efficiency, onboarding and support experience, while Octorate users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Customization and Flexibility
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation and Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
Onboarding and Support Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Reservation and Front Desk Automation
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Billing Complexity and Reporting Limitations
▾
|
|
|
−
Revenue Management
▾
|
|
|
−
Pricing and Fees
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #3 329 reviews | #78 0 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #1 397 reviews | #72 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #3 45 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 49 reviews | #41 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #1 483 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 220 reviews | #66 0 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #2 170 reviews | #71 0 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #1 130 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #8 106 reviews | #44 0 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #1 660 reviews | #51 0 reviews |
| Asia Pacific ▾ | #10 17 reviews | — |
| Middle East ▾ | #28 8 reviews | — |
Both Mews PMS and Octorate aim to streamline hotel operations, but they do so through markedly different approaches and strengths. Mews offers a comprehensive, highly-rated platform with extensive integrations and a reputation for user satisfaction, whereas Octorate presents a more straightforward, all-in-one solution with strong OTA certifications and a focus on automation. Your choice hinges on your hotel's size, complexity, and specific operational priorities.
Given the current review data and recent feedback, Mews emerges as the more proven and widely adopted platform. Are you ready to see which system aligns best with your hotel’s unique needs?
Mews and Octorate both serve hotels seeking to automate and centralize operations, but their core strengths differ significantly. Mews’s platform is designed for scalability and customization, with a focus on automation, integrations, and guest-centric features that support a broad range of property types. Conversely, Octorate emphasizes ease of use, OTA connectivity, and automation within a simplified dashboard, making it suitable for smaller or less complex properties.
The key difference is that Mews boasts a higher overall rating—4.62 out of 5 with 758 reviews, compared to Octorate’s zero rating due to lack of reviews—and more recent feedback, making it the more thoroughly validated choice. Does your hotel need broad customization and a large ecosystem, or is simplicity and OTA management your priority?
If your hotel operates at a medium to large scale, requires extensive integrations, or manages multiple properties, Mews is the clear choice. Its features like multi-lingual, multi-currency support, a guest CRM, automated space optimization, and a robust Marketplace make it ideal for hotels seeking flexibility and scalability.
On the other hand, if your property is smaller, with straightforward operations focused on OTA connectivity and automation, Octorate offers a streamlined, cost-effective solution. Octorate’s native channel management and automation tools are well-suited for properties that prioritize OTA distribution and ease of management with minimal customization.
Mews’s user interface is highly rated at 4.7/5, with many reviews praising its intuitive, modern design and simple onboarding process. The onboarding experience is rated 4.39/5, and users highlight the ease of remote setup, especially for small properties or boutique hotels. Support responsiveness is generally positive, though some users note occasional bugs, which are typically addressed promptly.
Octorate, lacking detailed user feedback and reviews, makes it difficult to assess its UI/UX. However, given its focus on simplicity and automation, it’s presumed to be user-friendly for smaller operations. Edge: Mews.
Mews offers 43 shared features plus 16 unique to it, including guest profiles, integrated payments and kiosks, automated room assignments, GDPR compliance, and SOC2 certification—supporting complex operations and high security. Its extensive ecosystem includes over 1,000 integrations, advanced revenue management, and automation tools.
Octorate has 26 features unique to it, such as a drag-and-drop calendar, electronic invoicing, and AI-powered guest communication. While it covers essential operational needs, it lacks the breadth and depth of automation and integrations that Mews provides.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s support ratings are 4.27/5, with many reviews mentioning responsive, knowledgeable support teams that resolve issues efficiently. Customers appreciate the onboarding process and ongoing assistance, although some report occasional bugs that are quickly fixed.
Octorate, with no recent reviews or detailed feedback available, can’t be reliably compared. Given Mews’s high review volume and recent feedback, it has the edge in support.
Mews impresses with over 336 verified partners, including key channel managers, revenue tools, and third-party integrations. Its open API and Marketplace foster a highly customizable environment suitable for complex, multi-channel operations.
Octorate has 28 verified partners, primarily focused on OTA connectivity and basic channel management. While it offers integrations with major OTAs, its ecosystem is significantly smaller.
Edge: Mews.
Mews’s recent reviews reflect a 4.62/5 overall rating, with 98 reviews in the last six months, and a 93% likelihood to recommend—evidence of strong current user satisfaction. It is highly rated across various segments, especially boutique, independent, and city hotels.
Octorate lacks recent reviews, making it impossible to gauge current user satisfaction. Therefore, Mews’s proven reputation and recent positive feedback give it the edge.
Mews’s pricing starts at $900/month, with no free trial or implementation fees, and is generally considered cost-effective considering its extensive features. Octorate charges $1,100/month with a 30-day free trial; its higher price point may reflect its OTA-centric focus.
Both platforms use subscription models, but Mews’s pricing appears more competitive relative to the depth of its features and recent user satisfaction.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small, single-property operation with minimal integration needs.
Not ideal if you require advanced automation, multi-property management, or extensive integrations.
Mews and Octorate serve different hotel management needs, but Mews’s superior review volume, recent user feedback, and richer feature set make it the clear leader for most properties. Its robust ecosystem supports growth, automation, and guest satisfaction across diverse hotel types.
Choose Mews if your hotel needs scalability, extensive integrations, and a proven track record of user satisfaction. Octorate is better suited for simpler operations focused on OTA connectivity and straightforward automation, especially for smaller properties.
In conclusion, if your goal is to future-proof your property with a flexible, well-supported, and highly-rated PMS, Mews is the more dependable choice. For smaller, OTA-centric properties, Octorate offers a streamlined, budget-friendly alternative—but with fewer features and less recent validation.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $900/mo | From $1,100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Mews PMS and Octorate (Property Management System) share 43 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Analytics dashboard | ||
| Custom dashboards | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Metasearch connectivity | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Multi-property Management | ||
| Open API | ||
| Tablet/Kiosk Check-in | ||
| Vacation Rental Rate Intelligence |
Showing top differences. 30 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"It was vital for us to find a hospitality cloud that would give us the freedom to innovate and move quickly with new technology – that’s one of the main reasons we chose Mews."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Since moving to Mews, we can be so much more agile in how we operate, both in terms of how we engage with guests and testing out new integrations and tools through Mews Marketplace..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We want to provide the best hospitality for guests anywhere in the country, and Mews is definitely the right solution to help us achieve that goal."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that... Users value Mews for its customizable workflows and flexibility in adapting to diverse hotel types and operational needs. Despite this, some note that more advanced configuration options, particularly in report generation and billing, could enhance the platform’s utility further.
The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on deliverin... The system is praised for automating many routine tasks like billing and invoicing, which reduces manual errors and allows staff to focus on delivering a superior guest experience. However, some reviews mention that while automation works well, the billing process can sometimes be complex.
The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial s... The onboarding experience with Mews has been inconsistent, with some users praising the hands-on approach while others faced challenges with initial setup efficiency. The support team's responsiveness has improved over time, enhancing problem resolution and user satisfaction.
Where hoteliers push back
While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could pr... While Mews automates billing, users report difficulties with its complexity and limitations in reporting and analytics. Enhancing these areas could provide better insights and flexibility for users managing financial operations.
Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynami... Mews provides a strong foundation for revenue management with its integration capabilities, but users indicate opportunities for improvement in dynamic pricing tools and advanced analytics, especially in multi-property operations.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Mews PMS and Octorate (Property Management System) share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Mews PMS offers 336 verified integration partners, while Octorate (Property Management System) offers 28. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Mews PMS leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Mews PMS: No. Octorate (Property Management System): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Mews has an HT Score of 99 and Octorate has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor