The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 130 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MISTER BOOKING shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Ancillary revenue tracking.
roommaster shines when it comes to customer support — especially for brand properties (5.0/5) , with exclusive features like Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader and Revenue Management Module.
Side-by-side ratings based on 130 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $500/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 100 |
After analyzing 130 verified reviews, MISTER BOOKING users most value its support quality, customizable features, ergonomics and design, while roommaster users highlight customer support, reservation management, centralized data management. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support quality
▾
|
+
Customer Support
▾
|
|
+
Customizable features
▾
|
+
Reservation Management
▾
|
|
+
Ergonomics and design
▾
|
+
Centralized Data Management
▾
|
|
+
Operational efficiency
▾
|
+
Cloud and Mobile Access
▾
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report generation
▾
|
−
Report Generation
▾
|
|
−
Booking engine
▾
|
−
User Interface Experience
▾
|
|
−
Connectivity issues
▾
|
−
Group Booking Capabilities
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #33 14 reviews | #30 26 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #45 4 reviews | #13 54 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) | — | #31 3 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #32 1 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #40 10 reviews | #22 35 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #35 7 reviews | #34 8 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #46 3 reviews | #24 15 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #27 6 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #10 62 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 25 reviews | #29 11 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #36 1 reviews | — |
| Middle East | — | #27 0 reviews |
Choosing between Misterbooking (PMS) and Roommaster PMS hinges on your hotel’s unique needs and operational scale. Misterbooking is primarily designed for independent hotels, inns, and boutique properties, offering a flexible, cloud-based solution that emphasizes ease of distribution and guest experience. In contrast, Roommaster is a comprehensive system tailored for larger hotels, chains, and properties seeking deep integration, extensive reporting, and centralized control. How do you prioritize usability versus feature depth?
Both platforms aim to streamline hotel management, but they diverge significantly in approach and capabilities. Misterbooking’s cloud-native setup and strong support network cater to smaller or independent operators, while Roommaster’s extensive features, over 270 built-in reports, and wider integration target established, multi-property hotels. Are you looking for a straightforward solution or a robust operations backbone?
The key question is which system aligns with your hotel’s operational complexity and growth ambitions. Misterbooking’s focus on simplicity and direct booking integration suits properties seeking a cost-effective, easy-to-implement platform. Roommaster’s depth and customization options benefit larger hotels needing detailed control and comprehensive data insights. Which qualities are more critical for your team?
If your hotel needs an intuitive, online management system with strong booking engine integration, Misterbooking is the clear choice. It excels in connecting to multiple OTAs, offers multi-currency and multi-lingual support, and boasts a high review score of 4.78/5 from 29 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its reliability and ease of use.
Conversely, if your hotel requires a detailed, feature-rich PMS with extensive internal modules—like EPoS, guest CRM, and automated night audits—Roommaster is better suited. It has a broader feature set (30 exclusive features), over 83 reviews, and a slightly lower overall rating of 4.33/5, though recent reviews note its effectiveness in streamlining complex operations.
Ultimately, Misterbooking’s recent reviews (all 17 in the last six months) and higher overall rating make it the more actively supported and trusted option currently. Do you prioritize recent user feedback or comprehensive feature depth?
Misterbooking scores a 4.71/5 in ease of use, with many reviewers praising its straightforward, cloud-based interface that reduces onboarding time. Users mention its user-friendly reservation management and support team as significant advantages, making staff training quicker and smoother.
Roommaster, rated at 4.22/5, is appreciated for its centralized data handling but criticized for a less modern, slightly more cluttered UI that can slow down daily tasks. Users note that the system’s depth sometimes complicates navigation, especially for new staff unfamiliar with all features.
For hotels prioritizing quick onboarding, minimal training, and daily ease, Edge: Misterbooking.
Roommaster boasts 30 features exclusive to its platform, including EPoS, integrated payment terminals, guest feedback management, mobile app, group booking engine, and automated night audits. Its extensive suite supports complex operations and multi-layered management.
Misterbooking offers 3 unique features—multi-lingual support, ancillary revenue tracking, and multi-currency management—focusing on distribution and guest experience. Both systems share 30 features, but Roommaster’s breadth of internal modules makes it more versatile for large, multi-faceted operations.
If your hotel needs rich operational features, Roommaster is the clear leader. For streamlined distribution and guest-focused tools, Edge: Roommaster.
Misterbooking’s support receives a 4.79/5 rating, with reviews highlighting quick, responsive, and helpful assistance. Users appreciate the availability of emergency support over weekends, which is vital for continuous operations.
Roommaster scores slightly lower at 4.25/5, with reviews pointing out inconsistent support experiences and limited help options over the phone. Some users report delays and difficulty resolving issues promptly.
For hoteliers valuing rapid, reliable support, Edge: Misterbooking.
Roommaster leads with 56 verified integrations, including major partners like Sage, GuestRevu, and Otelier, alongside shared partners like SiteMinder and RateGain. Its broad integration ecosystem enables seamless data flow across many hotel systems.
Misterbooking offers 26 verified partners, including key players like SiteMinder, RateGain, and D-Edge. While slightly fewer, these integrations still cover the essentials for smaller or independent hotels.
If extensive third-party integrations are crucial for your hotel, Edge: Roommaster.
Misterbooking’s recent reviews (17 in the last six months) and high overall rating (4.78/5) reflect strong, current user satisfaction, especially in ease of use and support. Hoteliers in boutique, inn, and hostel segments praise its flexibility and responsiveness.
Roommaster’s reviews, though numerous (83), tend to be more varied, with a slightly lower overall rating of 4.33/5, and some comments about interface complexity and support delays. Its users are often larger, multi-property operators.
Overall, Misterbooking’s more recent feedback and higher current ratings make it the more positively rated option now. Edge: Misterbooking.
Misterbooking’s pricing is not publicly listed; it operates on a custom quote basis, often favoring smaller hotels with no upfront implementation fees or monthly charges. Its model appears flexible, catering to independent properties.
Roommaster charges a flat fee of $500 per month, with no mention of additional setup costs, suitable for hotels willing to invest in a comprehensive system. The pricing reflects its extensive feature set and targeted enterprise functionality.
If budget transparency and flexibility are priorities, Misterbooking’s hidden pricing may be a consideration. For a predictable investment, Edge: Roommaster.
Not ideal if your hotel requires extensive internal modules like EPoS, guest feedback, or automated night audits, which Misterbooking does not extensively offer.
Not ideal if you desire a simple, lightweight system or are a small independent property with minimal operational complexity.
The core difference lies in scope: Misterbooking is a streamlined, user-friendly cloud PMS ideal for small to medium independent hotels, while Roommaster provides a feature-rich environment for larger, multi-property operations needing detailed control.
If your hotel values simplicity, recent reviews, and rapid support, go with Misterbooking. It offers a high satisfaction score and active user base, making it the safer choice for most small to mid-sized properties.
If your hotel requires extensive modules, detailed reporting, and multi-location management, Roommaster’s depth and integrations serve larger operations better. Its lower recent review activity and support inconsistency suggest it’s more suited for established, larger hotels prepared for a more complex platform.
Final recommendation: For most hotels today, Misterbooking’s current high ratings and recent positive reviews make it the more compelling choice. However, if your operations demand a deeply integrated, multi-module PMS, and you’re equipped to handle its complexity, Roommaster remains a strong contender.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $500/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Misterbooking (PMS) and roommaster PMS share 30 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary revenue tracking | ||
| Booking Engine | ||
| Channel Manager | ||
| EPoS | ||
| Integrated Payment Terminal & Card Reader | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-currency | ||
| Multi-lingual | ||
| Property Management System |
Showing top differences. 21 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 4 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"From my point of view as an asset manager that has the responsibility to tell the owners about their investment, roommaster gives me all that information. It's easy to report and e..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"We’re an independent hotel surrounded by giants, but roomMaster gave us the tools we needed to stand tall alongside them."
What hoteliers love
The support team’s responsiveness and effectiveness are repeatedly highlighted. Whether through phone or other means, their availability and ability t... The support team’s responsiveness and effectiveness are repeatedly highlighted. Whether through phone or other means, their availability and ability to address issues quickly is a major plus for users.
Users value the ability to customize their accounts to suit specific needs. This flexibility makes Misterbooking well-adapted for diverse hotel operat... Users value the ability to customize their accounts to suit specific needs. This flexibility makes Misterbooking well-adapted for diverse hotel operations and enhances user satisfaction.
While the software is functional and efficient, users note that the design and ergonomics could use improvements. Recommendations include making the l... While the software is functional and efficient, users note that the design and ergonomics could use improvements. Recommendations include making the layout more user-friendly and modernizing some outdated pages.
Where hoteliers push back
The need for more efficient and detailed statistical tools or reports is mentioned. Users feel that refining these features could lead to better opera... The need for more efficient and detailed statistical tools or reports is mentioned. Users feel that refining these features could lead to better operational insights and decision-making.
There are some criticisms regarding the booking engine, such as insufficient photo uploading options and restriction management. Users suggest that en... There are some criticisms regarding the booking engine, such as insufficient photo uploading options and restriction management. Users suggest that enhancements in these areas could further improve the system.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and und... While some users experience excellent customer support, others find inconsistencies. They suggest that improvements in support agent expertise and understanding of user issues are needed for a more satisfying experience.
Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group... Reservation handling is noted as a strong point, with users finding RoomMaster user-friendly and effective for managing reservations, including group bookings. However, some see room for improvement, particularly in handling rooming lists and group check-ins.
RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability o... RoomMaster's shift from disjointed manual methods to centralized data management is highly praised for reducing errors and improving the reliability of hotel operations. Users appreciate having all reservations, guest information, and financial data in one secure platform, enhancing workflow efficiency.
Where hoteliers push back
RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creatin... RoomMaster's report generation, while helpful, is identified as an area needing improvement. Users demand more efficiency and effectiveness in creating and exporting reports, suggesting that enhancements could streamline analysis tasks.
Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, wh... Some users note the need for improvements in user experience, particularly emphasizing the need to eliminate repetitive tasks like frequent logins, which can affect the seamlessness of using the software for daily tasks.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Misterbooking (PMS) and roommaster PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Misterbooking (PMS) offers 26 verified integration partners, while roommaster PMS offers 56. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Misterbooking (PMS) leads in ease of use at 4.7/5 vs 4.1/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Misterbooking (PMS): No. roommaster PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MISTER BOOKING has an HT Score of 14 and roommaster has 83. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor