The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 239 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MISTER BOOKING shines when it comes to support quality , with exclusive features like Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) and Native Email Marketing.
RoomRaccoon shines when it comes to user interface and experience — especially for independent properties (4.1/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App and Guest CRM.
Side-by-side ratings based on 239 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $1,000/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 30 | 209 |
After analyzing 239 verified reviews, MISTER BOOKING users most value its support quality, customizable features, ergonomics and design, while RoomRaccoon users highlight user interface and experience, all-in-one system, automated emails and documents. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Support quality
▾
|
+
User Interface and Experience
▾
|
|
+
Customizable features
▾
|
+
All-in-one System
▾
|
|
+
Ergonomics and design
▾
|
+
Automated Emails and Documents
▾
|
|
+
Operational efficiency
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Report generation
▾
|
−
Service and Support
▾
|
|
−
Booking engine
▾
|
−
Integration Limitations
▾
|
|
−
Connectivity issues
▾
|
−
System Bugs and Stability Issues
▾
|
How each product ranks among Property Management Systems vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #33 14 reviews | #10 90 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #45 4 reviews | #17 27 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #14 7 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | — | #19 0 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #40 10 reviews | #9 100 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #35 7 reviews | #9 64 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #46 3 reviews | #14 29 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | — | #7 28 reviews |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #24 7 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #19 25 reviews | #5 123 reviews |
| Asia Pacific | #36 1 reviews | #31 4 reviews |
| Middle East | — | #31 1 reviews |
When selecting a PMS, your hotel needs a solution that simplifies operations while maximizing revenue. Misterbooking and RoomRaccoon both aim to serve this purpose but diverge significantly in their approach, scale, and current market momentum. Misterbooking offers a traditional, fully integrated PMS with a strong European presence, while RoomRaccoon provides a more modern, all-in-one cloud platform with a broader global footprint. Which one better matches your hotel’s needs?
Both products aim to streamline reservations, automate guest communication, and connect to booking channels, but they differ in user experience, features, support, and pricing structure. Are you looking for a mature, well-established system with deep European roots, or a newer, flexible platform optimized for small to mid-sized independent hotels?
Misterbooking, with a recent review count of just 29 but steady overall ratings of 4.78/5, is a system favored in Europe, especially among inns, boutique hotels, and hostels. Its core strengths are its extensive booking channel integrations, customizable pricing, and support for multi-property management. However, its user interface and features sometimes feel dated, with some users citing translation issues and a need for better ergonomics.
RoomRaccoon, on the other hand, boasts 169 reviews and a higher overall rating of 4.88/5, reflecting broad adoption, particularly among independent hotels and boutique properties globally. Its cloud-based platform is lauded for ease of use, automation, and integrations, with recent reviews praising its ability to increase RevPAR and automate manual tasks. But some users note occasional bugs and support delays, which can impact daily operations.
Both solutions address core PMS needs, but Misterbooking’s limited recent reviews suggest less active development or customer feedback. Does your hotel prioritize stability with proven European support, or is modern usability and rapid feature evolution more critical?
If your hotel is an independent or boutique property in Europe seeking a highly customizable, channel-integrated PMS with strong support, Misterbooking might be suitable. Its features like native email marketing, guest communication via SMS, and booking engine are advantageous for hotels that prioritize direct guest engagement.
Conversely, if your hotel operates in multiple regions and values a user-friendly, all-in-one platform with automated operations, RoomRaccoon is the better choice. Its suite of features—including automated night audits, guest CRM, and mobile app support—are ideal for small to mid-sized hotels aiming for operational simplicity and revenue growth.
For properties that require robust multi-property management, RoomRaccoon’s broader integrations and scalability make it the more future-proof option. Which platform aligns with your growth plans and operational priorities?
Misterbooking’s UI, rated 4.71/5, is generally functional but can feel outdated, with some users mentioning a need for modernized design and more ergonomic navigation. Implementation is rated 4.67/5, but some reviews highlight difficulty in finding options quickly due to layout issues.
RoomRaccoon’s interface, rated 4.74/5, is praised for its intuitive, modern design that simplifies onboarding and daily use. The platform’s mobile app and dashboard are considered user-friendly, making staff adoption easier, especially for smaller teams.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Misterbooking offers 8 features unique to its platform, including native email marketing, guest SMS messaging, automated reminders, and GDPR compliance, which support guest communication and legal requirements. Its features are more traditional, focusing on reservation management and multi-property support.
RoomRaccoon provides 26 unique features, such as automated night audit, integrated payment terminals, guest CRM, inventory management, and a drag-and-drop tapechart. Its features cater to automating operations, revenue management, and guest engagement.
Given the breadth of features, RoomRaccoon has a clear edge in versatility and automation, especially for properties looking to reduce manual tasks.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Misterbooking’s support ratings are high at 4.79/5, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness and helpfulness. Clients appreciate the support team’s willingness to assist, including emergency services during weekends.
RoomRaccoon receives a support score of 4.53/5, with some users mentioning delays and occasional difficulties during critical moments. While support is generally helpful, the volume of recent reviews indicates room for faster responses.
Edge: Misterbooking.
RoomRaccoon’s integration count is significantly higher at 88 verified partners, including major OTAs, payment systems, and CRM tools. Shared integrations include SiteMinder, RateGain, and Lightspeed, with many exclusive third-party connections.
Misterbooking offers 26 verified partners, focusing mainly on European hospitality solutions, with notable integrations like RevControl and Xotels. Its smaller ecosystem limits flexibility for some hotels seeking extensive third-party connections.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
RoomRaccoon’s overall rating of 4.88/5 is supported by 169 reviews, with recent feedback emphasizing its ease of use, automation, and positive revenue impact. The property types most favorably reviewed include independent hotels and boutique resorts.
Misterbooking’s ratings are slightly lower at 4.78/5 based on fewer reviews, with consistent praise for multi-property management but some criticism of outdated UI and limited recent feedback.
For properties valuing recent reviews and broad user satisfaction, RoomRaccoon holds the edge.
Edge: RoomRaccoon.
Misterbooking’s pricing is not publicly disclosed, but it appears to operate on a custom quote basis, potentially with flexible packages for different hotel types.
RoomRaccoon charges a base fee of $1,000, with no monthly per-room charges or implementation fees, making it transparent and predictable, especially for small hotels.
If budget transparency is a priority, RoomRaccoon’s fixed pricing provides clarity. Misterbooking’s custom prices may be advantageous for larger or multi-property hotels negotiating tailored packages.
Not ideal if your hotel prioritizes modern UI, rapid feature updates, or extensive integrations outside Europe.
Not ideal if your hotel needs complex enterprise features or is a large chain requiring advanced analytics or multi-region control.
RoomRaccoon provides a modern, feature-rich platform with a user-centric design, making it highly suitable for small and independent hotels aiming for operational efficiency and revenue growth. Its extensive integrations and recent positive reviews demonstrate a commitment to evolving with hospitality needs.
Misterbooking, with fewer recent reviews and a smaller ecosystem, remains a solid solution for European hotels needing multi-property management and channel connectivity, especially if stability and regional support are priorities.
In conclusion, if your hotel seeks a scalable, automated, and highly-rated platform with a broad partner network, RoomRaccoon is the stronger choice. Conversely, if regional support, multi-property centralization, and traditional features are your focus, Misterbooking could fit your needs better.
Property Management Systems pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $1,000/mo |
According to HTR's product database, Misterbooking (PMS) and RoomRaccoon PMS share 25 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Automated night audit | ||
| Automated reminders | ||
| Base Pricing | ||
| Gift Vouchers | ||
| Guest CRM | ||
| Guest Communication (SMS Messaging) | ||
| Guest Messaging | ||
| Guest profiles | ||
| Integrated CRS | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Native Email Marketing | ||
| Online 24/7 support |
Showing top differences. 22 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Yield rules have helped us optimise our rates and our occupancy immensely. The ones we found most crucial were setting up yield rules for last minute bookings, to increase our occu..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"The automation of the payment system - from the guests receiving their invoice, the booking confirmation, and the payment being automatically accredited to the reservation - has le..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Most of our guests travel from far, and they might be tired when they arrive, so they might not always think about the extra things they might need - like a bathrobe and slippers...."
What hoteliers love
The support team’s responsiveness and effectiveness are repeatedly highlighted. Whether through phone or other means, their availability and ability t... The support team’s responsiveness and effectiveness are repeatedly highlighted. Whether through phone or other means, their availability and ability to address issues quickly is a major plus for users.
Users value the ability to customize their accounts to suit specific needs. This flexibility makes Misterbooking well-adapted for diverse hotel operat... Users value the ability to customize their accounts to suit specific needs. This flexibility makes Misterbooking well-adapted for diverse hotel operations and enhances user satisfaction.
While the software is functional and efficient, users note that the design and ergonomics could use improvements. Recommendations include making the l... While the software is functional and efficient, users note that the design and ergonomics could use improvements. Recommendations include making the layout more user-friendly and modernizing some outdated pages.
Where hoteliers push back
The need for more efficient and detailed statistical tools or reports is mentioned. Users feel that refining these features could lead to better opera... The need for more efficient and detailed statistical tools or reports is mentioned. Users feel that refining these features could lead to better operational insights and decision-making.
There are some criticisms regarding the booking engine, such as insufficient photo uploading options and restriction management. Users suggest that en... There are some criticisms regarding the booking engine, such as insufficient photo uploading options and restriction management. Users suggest that enhancements in these areas could further improve the system.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
What hoteliers love
Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, t... Many users find RoomRaccoon's user interface to be intuitive and easy to learn, which simplifies daily operations and onboarding new staff. However, there are suggestions for improvement, especially for mobile and tablet versions of the system to enhance usability further.
RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidat... RoomRaccoon users praise the all-in-one nature of the platform, which integrates booking engine, channel manager, PMS, and accounting. This consolidation helps streamline operations and eliminate the need for multiple software solutions. Many reviews highlight how this feature saves time and makes management easier.
Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Aut... Hoteliers find the automated emails and document features particularly valuable, noting that it saves time and enhances communication with guests. Automated invoicing and pre/post-stay emails are frequently mentioned benefits. Users also commend the customization options for these automated functionalities.
Where hoteliers push back
While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomR... While some users appreciate the helpfulness of individual customer support agents, many reviews criticize the availability and responsiveness of RoomRaccoon's support team. Long wait times for issue resolution, especially during critical operational periods, are common complaints.
Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs.... Several reviews point out the limitations in integrating RoomRaccoon with other systems like payment gateways (Stripe, Accounting software), and OTAs. Users express their desire for more seamless integrations to avoid manual work and additional expenses.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
It depends on your requirements. Misterbooking (PMS) and RoomRaccoon PMS share many core Property Management Systems features, but each has unique capabilities. Misterbooking (PMS) offers 26 verified integration partners, while RoomRaccoon PMS offers 88. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. RoomRaccoon PMS leads in ease of use at 4.8/5 vs 4.7/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Misterbooking (PMS): No. RoomRaccoon PMS: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Property Management Systems vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MISTER BOOKING has an HT Score of 14 and RoomRaccoon has 80. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor