The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 165 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
Flexkeeping shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Mobile App.
MS Shift shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 165 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 164 | 1 |
After analyzing 165 verified reviews, Flexkeeping users most value its integration with property management systems (pms), automation of task assignments, operational efficiency, while MS Shift users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Integration with Property Management Systems (PMS)
▾
|
|
|
+
Automation of Task Assignments
▾
|
|
|
+
Operational Efficiency
▾
|
|
|
+
User Experience
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
System Reliability
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Hotel Maintenance Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #2 22 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 85 reviews | #14 0 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 31 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | #3 23 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #4 76 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | #5 56 reviews | #11 1 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #7 45 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #3 25 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | #6 12 reviews | #13 1 reviews |
| Europe ▾ | #4 125 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #5 1 reviews | — |
Choosing the right maintenance software for your hotel hinges on understanding which product aligns best with your operational needs. Flexkeeping Maintenance Suite and MS Shift Asset Tracking both promise to streamline critical hotel functions, but they serve fundamentally different purposes—one targets comprehensive maintenance management, the other focuses solely on asset tracking. Your decision depends on whether your hotel needs an all-in-one maintenance platform or a specialized asset management tool.
Flexkeeping, with its extensive feature set, aims to improve all areas of hotel maintenance—preventative, corrective, and operational—while MS Shift concentrates exclusively on asset control. Do you require a broad maintenance solution or a dedicated asset tracker? The answer will guide your choice.
Flexkeeping and MS Shift address distinct hotel operational challenges. Flexkeeping's platform is designed to optimize maintenance workflows, reduce downtime, and facilitate communication across departments, making it suitable for complex properties with diverse needs. Meanwhile, MS Shift is narrowly focused on asset management, helping hotels control equipment inventory, reduce loss, and track repairs.
Flexkeeping’s high review count (139 reviews) and recent positive feedback—most reviews within the last 6 months—make it a more reliable indicator of current user satisfaction. Its 4.98/5 rating, compared to MS Shift's perfect 5/5 but only one review and 0 recent reviews, solidifies its position as the more trusted choice. Are your hotel’s needs more comprehensive or specialized?
If your hotel requires an integrated maintenance solution that manages work orders, recurring tasks, inspections, and preventative plans, Flexkeeping is the clear choice. It’s ideal for properties seeking to automate workflows, monitor staff performance, and reduce operational costs.
On the other hand, if your hotel’s primary concern is tracking equipment, managing inventory, and preventing asset loss—such as tools, appliances, or electronics—MS Shift offers a straightforward, user-friendly system. It’s best suited for departments or hotels that want a simple, focused solution without the need for broader maintenance management.
If you need a broad, multi-feature platform that improves overall operational efficiency, go with Flexkeeping. If your main goal is asset control and inventory oversight, pick MS Shift.
Flexkeeping’s UI has a 4.9/5 ease of use rating and is praised for its intuitive design, mobile app, and fast onboarding process. Users highlight its simplicity in automating workflows and managing tasks, which reduces staff training time and accelerates adoption. Several reviews emphasize how quickly teams adapt and begin seeing benefits.
MS Shift maintains a solid 4/5 ease of use rating, with users appreciating its straightforward asset tracking features. Its main limitation is browser compatibility, as some users mention the inability to use different web browsers, which can restrict flexibility.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping offers nine unique features, including work orders, recurring tasks, inventory trend analysis, custom inspections, preventative maintenance plans, pool chemical readings, notifications, asset maintenance logs, and a mobile app. These features collectively support complex maintenance workflows, proactive management, and cross-department communication.
MS Shift provides core asset tracking functions—checking out/in items, marking broken or missing, tracking usage, and scheduling maintenance—but lacks the broader maintenance capabilities Flexkeeping offers. It does not have additional features like inspections or inventory trend analysis.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping’s customer support is highly rated at 4.86/5, with reviews praising timely, effective assistance and excellent onboarding. Users describe their support as responsive and supportive, helping them implement and troubleshoot the system effectively.
MS Shift’s support ratings are not available, but reviews consistently mention ease of use and straightforwardness. Its limited review count and lack of recent feedback suggest less recent customer engagement or fewer support interactions.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping integrates with 24 verified partners, including RoomRaccoon, Guesty, RMS, Oracle Hospitality, and Mews. These integrations facilitate seamless data flow with property management systems, booking engines, and other hotel operations tools.
MS Shift has no verified integrations listed, which limits its ability to connect with other hotel systems. This may hinder operational cohesion in properties relying on multiple platforms.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping has accumulated 139 reviews, with an overall rating of 4.98/5 and a very high likelihood to recommend (97%). Recent reviews emphasize its ease of use, broad feature set, and significant operational improvements across diverse property types, including large resorts and boutique hotels.
MS Shift has only one recent review, rating it at 5/5, with positive comments on its simplicity and visibility of activities. However, the limited volume of reviews makes it less reliable as an indicator of general satisfaction.
Edge: Flexkeeping.
Flexkeeping’s pricing starts at $300 per month, with no free trial or implementation fees. The platform operates on a flat fee model, making costs predictable for hotels of various sizes.
MS Shift does not publicly disclose pricing details, which suggests it may require custom quotes or be priced on a case-by-case basis. Its lack of transparency makes direct comparison difficult.
Not ideal if your hotel is a small property with minimal maintenance needs or limited IT infrastructure.
Not ideal if you require a comprehensive maintenance platform or integration with other hotel management systems.
Flexkeeping and MS Shift serve different hotel operational needs. Flexkeeping is a versatile, feature-rich platform designed to overhaul maintenance workflows, improve communication, and reduce costs. MS Shift is a specialized asset management tool, ideal for hotels that need to control equipment inventory and minimize asset loss.
If your property faces complex maintenance challenges and seeks operational efficiency, Flexkeeping’s extensive features and recent positive reviews make it the better choice. Its broad integrations, high support ratings, and high user satisfaction demonstrate that it’s a mature solution trusted by many large and boutique hotels alike.
Conversely, if your main concern is tracking equipment, controlling inventory, and ensuring asset accountability without the need for broader maintenance workflows, MS Shift offers a straightforward, easy-to-use solution. Its simplicity and focus make it suitable for departments or properties with minimal maintenance complexity.
In summary, choose Flexkeeping for a comprehensive maintenance management experience, especially if your hotel values automation, analytics, and broad system integrations. Opt for MS Shift if your priority is precise asset tracking with minimal operational overhead.
Hotel Maintenance Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $300/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite and MS Shift (MS Asset Tracking) share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Custom Inspections | ||
| Inventory Trend Analysis | ||
| Mobile App | ||
| Preventative Maintenance Plan Mapping | ||
| Recurring Tasks | ||
| Work Orders & Ticketing |
We analyzed 8 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
"Flexkeeping completely transformed our workflow which led to an 80% reduction in the workload, simplifying processes and massively lowering our stress levels!"
No published case study for this goal yet.
"Every comment a guest makes gets immediately communicated throughout the whole hotel. Since it’s such a transparent platform, staff can react instantly, and management can stay inf..."
No published case study for this goal yet.
What hoteliers love
The software integrates seamlessly with various property management systems, which is highlighted as a significant advantage. This integration allows... The software integrates seamlessly with various property management systems, which is highlighted as a significant advantage. This integration allows for streamlined operations and enhanced efficiency. However, there are mentions of occasional downtime, which users hope will be resolved through the company's merger.
Users frequently praise Flexkeeping for simplifying housekeeping and maintenance tasks through automation. It saves several hours daily by efficiently... Users frequently praise Flexkeeping for simplifying housekeeping and maintenance tasks through automation. It saves several hours daily by efficiently automating and assigning tasks, thereby improving staff productivity and reducing operational expenses.
Flexkeeping significantly enhances operational efficiency by reducing the time spent on administrative tasks and improving the coordination of mainten... Flexkeeping significantly enhances operational efficiency by reducing the time spent on administrative tasks and improving the coordination of maintenance workflows. This is particularly beneficial in streamlining tasks and freeing up time for staff to focus on other critical areas.
Where hoteliers push back
While the system is generally praised for its functionality, some users have experienced brief interruptions due to integration issues. Increased reli... While the system is generally praised for its functionality, some users have experienced brief interruptions due to integration issues. Increased reliability is anticipated following the company's recent merger announcements, which users expect will resolve these sporadic issues.
Ranks higher for
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite and MS Shift (MS Asset Tracking) share many core Hotel Maintenance Software features, but each has unique capabilities. Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite offers 24 verified integration partners, while MS Shift (MS Asset Tracking) offers 0. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 4.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
Flexkeeping - Maintenance Suite: No. MS Shift (MS Asset Tracking): No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Hotel Maintenance Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. Flexkeeping has an HT Score of 93 and MS Shift has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor