The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 43 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
MyStay shines in ease of use and customer support , with exclusive features like Guest Segmentation & Targeting and Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat).
Thales Group shines .
Side-by-side ratings based on 43 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | Contact sales |
| Verified Reviews | 43 | 0 |
After analyzing 43 verified reviews, MyStay users most value its contactless check-in, guest experience, guest communication, while Thales Group users highlight . Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
|
|
Thales Group |
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Contactless Check-In
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Experience
▾
|
|
|
+
Guest Communication
▾
|
|
|
+
Support and Continuous Improvement
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Customization Options
▾
|
|
|
−
Integration with PMS
▾
|
|
|
−
System Speed and Performance
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Contactless Check-in vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment |
|
Thales Group |
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) ▾ | #5 15 reviews | — |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | #6 10 reviews | — |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | #4 7 reviews | — |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) | #8 3 reviews | — |
By Property Type
| Segment |
|
Thales Group |
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Luxury ▾ | #4 11 reviews | — |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | #5 12 reviews | — |
| Extended Stay ▾ | #6 9 reviews | — |
By Region
| Segment |
|
Thales Group |
|---|---|---|
| North America | #7 3 reviews | — |
| Europe ▾ | #4 32 reviews | — |
| Asia Pacific | #6 2 reviews | — |
| Middle East | #4 2 reviews | — |
Choosing between MyStay Check-in by MyStay and Thales by Thales Group hinges on what your hotel needs most. Both products tackle contactless check-in, but MyStay offers a dedicated, fully-featured platform tailored for hotels, while Thales appears less developed with no recent reviews or user feedback. Are you looking for a proven, trusted solution with extensive hotel-specific features?
MyStay addresses the core hotel contactless check-in challenge with a suite of tools that streamline operations, enhance guest experience, and reduce costs. Thales, lacking recent user data and reviews, doesn’t currently demonstrate the same level of hotel-specific functionality or market presence. Which platform aligns better with your current priorities?
MyStay is a contactless check-in solution designed specifically for hotels, boasting a 5/5 overall rating based on 40 reviews and recent positive feedback. Thales, with zero reviews and a 0/5 score, does not provide sufficient evidence of hotel industry effectiveness or user satisfaction.
MyStay’s features include PMS integration, digital check-in/out, guest communication, upselling, and multiple channel delivery, all tailored to hotels’ needs. Thales lacks detailed feature descriptions or user reviews, making it difficult to assess its suitability. Given the review volume and recent ratings, it’s clear MyStay is the more reliable choice for hotel contactless solutions.
If your hotel needs a comprehensive, easy-to-implement contactless check-in system that integrates with existing PMS solutions, go with MyStay. Its user base spans Europe, North America, Asia Pacific, and other regions, with high hotel segment diversity, including boutique, city center, resorts, and serviced apartments.
If your hotel’s focus is on a niche or specific technical integration not covered by MyStay, or if you are exploring options with zero recent support or user feedback, Thales might be worth considering. However, the lack of recent reviews and detailed features suggests MyStay is the safer, more proven choice for most hotels seeking a contactless check-in upgrade.
MyStay’s UI has a 4.91/5 ease of use rating, supported by many reviews praising its intuitive setup and straightforward operation. Hoteliers report onboarding as quick, with the platform being accessible even for staff with limited technical skills.
Thales offers no recent review data or user feedback to judge ease of use, which raises concerns about its user-friendliness or onboarding process. Without user insights, it’s impossible to confirm whether Thales provides a smooth experience.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay offers 14 unique features, including PMS integration, guest segmentation, multi-channel communication, digital payments, room upgrade merchandising, offer templates, A/B testing, and self-service check-in/out. Thales, by contrast, provides no detailed feature list or unique functionalities.
The breadth of features in MyStay specifically supports hotel operations, marketing, and guest engagement. Thales’s lack of demonstrable hotel-centric features means it likely falls short in delivering a comparable, comprehensive solution.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s support scores a 4.93/5, with reviews emphasizing responsiveness, helpfulness, and ongoing updates. Customers appreciate the quick resolution of issues and the platform’s continuous improvement.
Thales, with no recent reviews or customer feedback, provides no clear evidence of support quality or responsiveness. The absence of recent user testimonials suggests less confidence in its customer service.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay integrates with 30 verified partners, including property management systems, channel managers, and service providers like Yanolja Cloud and RoomRaccoon. Thales offers only one verified integration, Yanolja Cloud, limiting its flexibility for hotel operations.
The extensive integration network in MyStay allows hotels to build a connected ecosystem, whereas Thales’s limited integrations restrict its adaptability and potential for seamless operation.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay enjoys a 5/5 overall rating based on 40 reviews, with a 98% likelihood of recommendation. Its reviews are recent, and the platform receives high praise for ease of use, support, and features across various hotel types.
Thales has no recent reviews or ratings, making it impossible to assess user satisfaction or property preferences. Given the available data, MyStay clearly holds the higher hotel rating.
Edge: MyStay.
MyStay’s pricing is straightforward at $400 monthly, without a free tier or trial, offering transparency for hotel decision-makers. Thales does not publicly disclose pricing or trial options, which complicates direct comparison.
The clear, predictable pricing for MyStay simplifies budgeting and decision-making, while Thales’s opaque pricing model may pose risks or hidden costs.
Not ideal if:
Not ideal if:
MyStay stands out as a proven, feature-rich solution tailored for hotels, supported by a strong user base, recent reviews, and extensive integrations. Its consistent high ratings and positive feedback confirm it as a reliable choice for contactless check-in and guest engagement.
Thales, with no recent reviews, limited feature information, and minimal integrations, appears not ready for hotels seeking a dependable digital check-in platform. Unless your hotel has very niche needs or already has a different solution, MyStay is the clear recommendation.
If your hotel values a mature, well-supported system with comprehensive features proven in the field, go with MyStay. Its ongoing positive review trend and broad market presence make it the safer, smarter investment.
Choose Thales only if you have specific, niche requirements and are prepared to navigate its untested landscape. For most hotels looking to modernize operations quickly and effectively, MyStay remains the superior option.
Contactless Check-in pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
|
|
Thales Group | |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | From $400/mo | — |
According to HTR's product database, MyStay Check in and Thales share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature |
|
Thales Group |
|---|---|---|
| Ancillary Product Merchandising | ||
| Guest Segmentation & Targeting | ||
| Multi-Channel Delivery (Email, SMS, WhatsApp, Chat) | ||
| PMS Integration | ||
| Room Upgrade Merchandising | ||
| Segmentation |
Showing top differences. 2 more features differ between these products.
What hoteliers love
Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates th... Reviewers frequently mention MyStay's contactless check-in feature as a crucial tool, especially during the pandemic. It simplifies and accelerates the check-in process, allowing guests to complete it before arrival, and reducing physical contact. Users appreciate the ease of use and efficiency it brings to their operation.
Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival con... Reviewers often remarked how MyStay significantly enhances the guest experience. The platform allows for pre-arrival communications and on-arrival convenience, imparting a feeling of personalized and attentive service. Hoteliers noticed higher guest satisfaction as a direct outcome.
Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, a... Many reviews highlight how MyStay improves guest communication. The platform allows hoteliers to efficiently communicate with guests before, during, and after their stay through automated messages. This feature enhances guest satisfaction by providing timely information and resolving queries promptly.
Where hoteliers push back
Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire... Users frequently suggested the need for more customization options, particularly in automated messaging and guest communication templates. They desire more flexibility in adjusting texts, graphics, and automatic messaging formats to better suit their specific needs.
MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration... MyStay's integration with property management systems (PMS) is a valuable feature, mentioned positively in several reviews. This seamless integration helps hoteliers manage guest data and operations more effectively. However, some users did encounter occasional syncing issues between MyStay and their PMS.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. MyStay Check in and Thales share many core Contactless Check-in features, but each has unique capabilities. MyStay Check in offers 30 verified integration partners, while Thales offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. MyStay Check in leads in ease of use at 4.9/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
MyStay Check in: No. Thales: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Contactless Check-in vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. MyStay has an HT Score of 22 and Thales Group has 0. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor