The project dashboard is a free tool that is only available to verified hoteliers to make adopting new technology easier by streamlining their research and simplifying their communication workflow.
TLDR
We analyzed 69 verified hotelier reviews, compared feature sets, pricing, and real-world case studies to break down where each platform delivers. The right choice depends on your property type and priorities:
NAB Transact shines .
ROH shines in ease of use and customer support — especially for brand properties (0.0/5) , with exclusive features like Payment Splitting and Recurring Payments.
Side-by-side ratings based on 69 verified hotelier reviews on HTR.
| HTScore |
|
|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Ease of Use |
|
|
| Customer Support |
|
|
| Value for Money |
|
|
| Starting Price | Contact sales | From $100/mo |
| Verified Reviews | 0 | 69 |
After analyzing 69 verified reviews, NAB Transact users most value its , while ROH users highlight automation of payments and invoicing, user-friendly interface, training and support. Click any theme to see what reviewers say.
| NAB Transact |
|
|---|---|
| Pros | |
|
+
Automation of payments and invoicing
▾
|
|
|
+
User-friendly interface
▾
|
|
|
+
Training and support
▾
|
|
|
+
Real-time reporting and notifications
▾
|
|
| Cons | |
|
−
Integration capabilities
▾
|
|
How each product ranks among Payments Processing Software vendors for different property sizes, types, and regions — based on verified reviews from hoteliers in each segment.
By Hotel Size
| Segment | NAB Transact |
|
|---|---|---|
| Small (10-24 rooms) | — | #3 2 reviews |
| Mid-Size (25-74 rooms) ▾ | — | #4 13 reviews |
| Large (75-199 rooms) ▾ | — | #2 21 reviews |
| X-Large (200+ rooms) ▾ | — | #2 25 reviews |
By Property Type
| Segment | NAB Transact |
|
|---|---|---|
| Boutique ▾ | — | #2 31 reviews |
| Luxury ▾ | — | #2 34 reviews |
| Branded / Chain ▾ | — | #2 28 reviews |
| Extended Stay | — | #3 4 reviews |
By Region
| Segment | NAB Transact |
|
|---|---|---|
| North America ▾ | — | #2 61 reviews |
| Europe | — | #3 1 reviews |
Choosing the right payments processing software is critical for your hotel’s operational efficiency and financial health. NAB Transact and ROH are both solutions aimed at streamlining payment handling, but they differ significantly in features, user experience, and market presence. As of now, ROH has a clear edge due to its more recent reviews and wider adoption, especially in the hospitality sector.
Your decision should hinge on whether you need a simple, traditional payment processor or a more integrated, feature-rich platform designed specifically for hospitality. Are you prioritizing ease of use and automation, or do you need extensive payment options and integrations?
NAB Transact attempts to serve hotel payment needs, but it lacks reviews and recent data, suggesting limited market presence and possibly outdated or unverified capabilities. ROH, with 65 reviews and a 9.91/10 NPS score, demonstrates high user satisfaction and ongoing engagement, making it a more reliable choice for hotels seeking proven solutions.
Both products aim to facilitate payment processing, but ROH’s comprehensive feature set and recent positive feedback indicate a more modern approach. Are you comfortable with an unreviewed product, or do you prefer a solution validated by peer experiences?
If your hotel needs a platform that offers extensive payment options, automation, and integration capabilities, ROH is the clear choice. Its 19 unique features—like payment splitting, recurring payments, and PCI compliance—support complex hospitality use cases, making it ideal for mid-sized to large properties.
Conversely, NAB Transact’s lack of features and reviews suggests it might be suitable only for hotels with minimal payment processing needs. If your hotel operates with straightforward payment flows and no advanced requirements, NAB Transact might suffice, but it’s a less proven option.
ROH scores 4.95 out of 5 for ease of use, with recent reviews praising its user-friendly interface and intuitive design. Hotel staff find it easy to navigate, generate invoices, and manage payments, with many noting minimal training required.
NAB Transact, with a score of 0/5, offers no recent reviews or user feedback, making its usability uncertain. Its absence of data suggests it likely lacks the modern, streamlined interface that ROH provides.
Edge: ROH
ROH offers 19 distinct features tailored for hospitality, including refund management, payment splitting, pre-authorizations, and accepting multiple card brands like Visa, Mastercard, and American Express. NAB Transact offers no unique features or capabilities, making it a barebones solution.
The additional features in ROH allow your hotel to handle complex payment scenarios, automate processes, and enhance security. For hotels needing more than basic transaction processing, ROH’s feature set is a decisive advantage.
Edge: ROH
ROH’s support scores 4.97/5, with recent reviews emphasizing excellent onboarding, ongoing assistance, and a responsive support team. Users highlight how their support helped streamline implementation and resolve issues rapidly.
NAB Transact’s support data is unavailable, and its review count is zero, indicating no recent user feedback. Without verified customer support ratings, ROH’s support reputation is far superior.
Edge: ROH
ROH maintains one verified integration with Oracle Hospitality, alongside its feature-rich platform. NAB Transact has no verified integrations, limiting its ability to connect with other hotel management systems or third-party tools.
For hotels that rely on a connected tech stack, ROH’s integration capabilities offer greater flexibility, reducing manual work and improving data accuracy.
Edge: ROH
ROH’s average review score of 4.95/5 reflects strong user satisfaction, especially among hotels in luxury, resorts, and city center segments. Its recent reviews reinforce its reputation as a highly user-friendly and reliable platform.
NAB Transact, with no reviews or ratings, provides no data to support any positive or negative experiences. Its absence of recent user feedback makes ROH the clearly preferred option.
Edge: ROH
NAB Transact offers no publicly available pricing details, implying it may involve custom quotes or legacy billing models. ROH charges a straightforward $100 monthly fee, with no additional implementation or room-based charges.
Given the transparent pricing and recent positive reviews, ROH offers clearer value and budget predictability compared to NAB Transact’s opaque structure.
Not ideal if your hotel needs automation, multiple payment options, or integration with existing property management or accounting systems.
Not ideal if your hotel operates with very simple payment flows and lacks the need for extensive features or integrations.
ROH delivers a comprehensive payments platform built specifically for hospitality, with high user satisfaction and recent positive reviews. NAB Transact, by contrast, appears outdated and unreviewed, making it a risky choice for modern hotels.
If your hotel values automation, integrations, and proven support, ROH is the superior option. NAB Transact might be suitable for very basic, small-scale needs but lacks the reliability and features that today’s hotels require.
In summary, choose ROH if you want a flexible, well-supported system with a proven track record. Opt for NAB Transact only if your needs are minimal and you’re prepared for a less tested platform.
Payments Processing Software pricing is rarely straightforward. Here is what we know from each vendor's public pricing data. Always request a custom quote for your property size.
| NAB Transact |
|
|
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | — | From $100/mo |
According to HTR's product database, NAB Transact and ROH share 0 features. Here are the key differences — features one has that the other lacks.
| Feature | NAB Transact |
|
|---|---|---|
| Partial Capture | ||
| Pay by Link | ||
| Payment Splitting | ||
| Pre-Authorizations | ||
| Recurring Payments | ||
| Refund Management |
Showing top differences. 7 more features differ between these products.
We analyzed 1 verified case studies to compare what hotels actually achieve with each platform across four key business objectives.
No published case study for this goal yet.
"When we were new to ROH, a change in my finance team left our accounts receivable a mess—over a million dollars past due. I reached out to the ROH team in a panic, and they immedia..."
What hoteliers love
Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently h... Automation of payments and invoicing streamlines key financial tasks such as scheduling, billing, and notification of payments. Reviewers frequently highlight the time savings and operational efficiency gained through ROH's automation. It also helps in reducing manual errors, thereby improving cash flow management.
ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of... ROH is consistently praised for its intuitive interface, which is easy for both hotel staff and clients to use. The platform simplifies the process of making and receiving payments, leading to a smoother transaction experience and increased satisfaction among users.
Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly benefi... Users appreciate the initial training and continued support from ROH, helping to ensure a smooth adoption of the software. This is particularly beneficial for onboarding new users or addressing complex queries effectively.
Where hoteliers push back
While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS a... While ROH provides significant time-saving benefits, several users suggested enhancements around integration with existing hotel systems such as PMS and sales software for even greater efficiency. This includes potential integration with Salesforce, Delphi, and Opera.
Unique capabilities
Where the ratings diverge most
It depends on your requirements. NAB Transact and ROH share many core Payments Processing Software features, but each has unique capabilities. NAB Transact offers 0 verified integration partners, while ROH offers 1. Review the feature comparison above to see where they differ before switching.
Small hotels should prioritize ease of use and fast onboarding. ROH leads in ease of use at 5.0/5 vs 0.0/5. Look for transparent pricing and a trial or demo option. Filter reviews on each product page by property size to hear from hotels like yours.
NAB Transact: No. ROH: No. Neither product currently offers a free tier. Most Payments Processing Software vendors offer demos or trials — request one from each to evaluate before committing.
The HT Score is a composite ranking that considers 4 criteria groups and over a dozen variables to help hoteliers objectively compare hotel technology products. NAB Transact has an HT Score of 0 and ROH has 100. Here is how the score is calculated.
| Criteria Group | Weight | What It Measures |
|---|---|---|
| Customer Ratings & Reviews |
|
How highly do users recommend this product? Ratings Score, Review Volume, Share of Voice, Review Depth, Review Recency, Success Stories ▾ The most heavily weighted factor. Analyzes average satisfaction ratings (likelihood to recommend, ease of use, support, ROI), total review count relative to category peers, review recency (at least 20 reviews in the trailing 6 months), and share of voice across unique hotel clients to detect selection bias. |
| Partner Ecosystem |
|
How highly do tech partners recommend this company? Partner Recommendations, Integration Quantity, Integration Quality ▾ Evaluates partner recommendations as expert votes of confidence, the number of verified integrations, and ecosystem quality — the average HT Scores of integration partners. Products with higher-quality integration ecosystems are more likely to deliver a connected tech stack. |
| Customer Centricity |
|
How customer-centric is this organization? Certified Support, Review Consistency, Profile Completeness ▾ Assesses whether the company has earned HTR Customer Support Certification, maintains consistent review collection over time (an indicator of feedback-driven culture), and keeps product profiles complete with capabilities, screenshots, pricing, and features. |
| Reach, Staying Power & Resources |
|
How extensive is this company's reach and resourcing? Geographic Reach, Staying Power, Company Resources, Trending Score ▾ Measures global presence (countries and regions served), years in business as a stability proxy, team headcount as a resource proxy, and a trending score based on trailing-twelve-month buyer inquiries, reviews, partner recommendations, and press activity. |
Customer ratings and reviews are by far the most important factor in the HT Score algorithm. HTR does not accept payment for higher rankings. All reviews are verified — only hotel industry practitioners with confirmed affiliations can submit ratings. View full HT Score methodology →
Product recommendations advisor